Document Detail


Validation of a high fidelity adult ureteroscopy and renoscopy simulator.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20022047     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: Surgical simulation technology may efficiently train and accurately assess the acquisition of many skills. Surgical simulators often lack realism and can be expensive at $3,000 to more than $60,000. We assessed the face, content and construct validity of a newly developed, anatomically accurate, reasonably priced high fidelity ureteroscopy and renoscopy trainer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 46 participants, including attending urologists, urology residents, medical students and industry representatives, assessed the face and content validity of the simulator using a standard questionnaire. Ten experienced ureteroscopists with greater than 30 procedures per year and 10 novice ureteroscopists with 0 were assessed on the ability to perform flexible ureteroscopy, renoscopy and intrarenal basket extraction of a lower pole calculus using the adult ureteroscopy trainer (Ideal Anatomic Modeling, Holt, Michigan). Subject performance was assessed by an experienced ureteroscopist using a checklist, global rating scale and time to task completion. RESULTS: Of participants 100% rated the trainer as realistic and easy to use, and thought it was a good training tool, 98% thought that it would serve as a good training format and 96% would recommend it to urology trainees. All participants recommended it for use in residency programs and 96% would or would have used it during residency. Only 37.5% vs 100% of experienced vs novice ureteroscopists would use it to practice. Of participants 9% foresaw a problem with the trainer. On the trainer experienced ureteroscopists scored significantly higher on the global rating scale (mean +/- SD 33.1 +/- 1.3 vs 15.0 +/- 2.7, p <0.0001) and checklist (4.1 +/- 1.0 vs 2.4 +/- 1.1, p = 0.004), and required less time to complete the task (141.2 +/- 40.1 vs 447.2 +/- 301.7 seconds, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary study suggests the face, content and construct validity of the adult ureteroscopy trainer as a high fidelity ureteroscopy and renoscopy trainer.
Authors:
Michael A White; Alexander P Dehaan; Doyle D Stephens; Andrew A Maes; Thomas J Maatman
Related Documents :
1099207 - A simulation laboratory for medical education.
19823907 - Enabling, implementing, and validating training methods in laparoscopic surgery.
15972187 - Implementation of a web- and simulation-based curriculum to ease the transition from me...
15917357 - Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach.
17208717 - Renewing governance.
11604747 - An approach to guideline implementation with gem.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Validation Studies    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  183     ISSN:  1527-3792     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2010 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-28     Completed Date:  2010-02-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  673-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine Urologic Consortium, Metro Health Hospital, Wyoming, Michigan 49519, USA. mikeawhite@sbcglobal.net
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Computer Simulation*
Computer-Assisted Instruction*
Education, Medical / methods*
Humans
Kidney*
Ureteroscopy*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Parental Satisfaction After Open Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Results From Modifi...
Next Document:  Testicular Asymmetry and Adolescent Varicoceles Managed Expectantly.