Document Detail


Vaginal delivery after Misgav-Ladach cesarean section--is the risk of uterine rupture acceptable?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20082597     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the single-layer closure as is a routine by the Misgav-Ladach method compared to the double-layer closure as used by the Dörfler cesarean method is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture in the subsequent pregnancy and delivery.
METHODS: The analysis is retrospective and is based on medical documentation of the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. All patients with one previous cesarean section who attempted vaginal birth following cesarean section were managed from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2008. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, greater than one previous cesarean section, previous incision other than low transverse, gestational age at delivery less than 37 weeks and induction of delivery. We identified 448 patients who met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: We found that 303 patients had a single-layer closure (Misgav-Ladach) and 145 had a double-layer closure (Dörffler) of the previous uterine incision. There were 35 cases of uterine rupture. Of those patients with previous single-layer closure, 5.28% (16/303) had a uterine rupture compared to 13.11% (19/145) in the double-layer closure group (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: We have not found that a Misgav-Ladach cesarean section method (single-layer uterine closure) might be more likely to result in uterine rupture in women who attempted a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean delivery. This cesarean section method should find its confirmation in everyday clinical practice.
Authors:
Igor Hudić; Zlatan Fatusić; Lejla Kamerić; Mladen Misić; Indira Serak; Anela Latifagić
Related Documents :
18055717 - Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior ce...
22889807 - Occurrence of septic shock in a patient submitted to emergency cerclage following a neg...
2009067 - Topical silicone gel for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scar.
20235897 - Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
17132677 - Eshre pgd consortium data collection vi: cycles from january to december 2003 with preg...
8410827 - Quantitative and cytochemical studies of mast cell proteases in rat ovaries and uteri i...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians     Volume:  23     ISSN:  1476-4954     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med.     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-13     Completed Date:  2011-01-06     Revised Date:  2011-06-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101136916     Medline TA:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1156-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Center, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. i.hudic@bih.net.ba
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Bosnia-Herzegovina / epidemiology
Cesarean Section / adverse effects*,  methods*
Female
Humans
Incidence
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Suture Techniques / adverse effects*
Uterine Rupture / epidemiology,  etiology*
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean / adverse effects*,  statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Jun;24(6):870   [PMID:  21121712 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Outcome of adolescent pregnancies in southwestern Nigeria: a case-control study.
Next Document:  Maternal and umbilical resistin levels do not correlate with infant birth weight either in normal pr...