Document Detail

VDD pacemaker replacement is safe and reliable independently of the previously implanted lead: a prospective and controlled study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16755339     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Theoretically, replacement of a VDD device requires using a similar pacemaker to provide the best match between the filtering characteristics of the pacemaker and the atrial dipole of the lead. This study evaluated the performance of newly implanted Vitatron VDD pacemakers connected to dedicated leads and compared the results with those of the same Vitatron pacemakers used as replacement but connected to a variety of nondedicated leads. METHODS: 23 consecutive patients (15 M, 8 F, 78 +/- 6 years) in Group 1 underwent pacemaker replacement with a VDD(R) Saphir 3 (Vitatron BV, Arnhem, The Netherlands) device designed for an 8.6 mm atrial dipole. Atrial dipoles of the previously implanted leads ranged from 5 to 30 mm. Another 22 consecutive patients (14 M, 8 F, 80 +/- 7 years) in Group 2 received a Saphir 3 pacemaker with the related dedicated lead. RESULTS: P-wave amplitude measured by the same Pacing Sensing Analyzer (PSA) at the first implantation was 1.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.5 mV (P = NS) in groups 1 and 2 respectively. P-wave amplitudes measured at 1 month follow-up after replacement in Group 1 and at 1 month follow-up after implantation in Group 2 were 0.69 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.3 mV (P = NS) respectively. The percentage of atrial sensing at the same follow-up was 97 +/- 3 vs. 95 +/- 5% (P = NS) in groups 1 and 2 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of VDD pacemakers with the Saphir 3 model designed for a short dipole is safe and reliable when used in combination with previously implanted nondedicated leads.
Alessandro Fabiani; Antonio Burali; Enrico Manfredini; Giorgio Corbucci; Leonardo Bolognese; S Serge Barold
Related Documents :
20957479 - Peak circulatory power as an indicator of clinical status in children after fontan proc...
10824899 - Similarities and differences in the exercise performance of patients after a modified f...
19482309 - Experimental repair of tracheal defect using a bioabsorbable copolymer.
20616549 - Long-term follow-up of the first patients to undergo transcatheter alcohol septal ablat...
16684019 - Predictors of appropriate defibrillator therapy among patients with an implantable defi...
665319 - Patients with high-grade atrioventricular block treated and not treated with a pacemaker.
24286809 - Radiofrequency ablation of the pancreas: two-week follow-up in a porcine model.
9083869 - Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and the role of mg...
23147629 - Percutaneous curettage and suction for pediatric extremity aneurysmal bone cysts: is it...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing     Volume:  15     ISSN:  1383-875X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol     Publication Date:  2006 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-06-06     Completed Date:  2007-01-30     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9708966     Medline TA:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  107-11     Citation Subset:  IM    
Div Cardiologia, Osp Area Aretina Nord, Arezzo, Italy.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aged, 80 and over
Device Removal
Electrodes, Implanted
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Heart Block / therapy*
Pacemaker, Artificial*
Prospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Usefulness of the polarity in high-density wide range-filtered bipolar mapping to detect isthmus blo...
Next Document:  The bioprosthesis type and size influence the postoperative incidence of permanent pacemaker implant...