| Using perinatal audit to promote change: a review. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 10173399 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Close to half of all infant deaths world-wide now occur in the first week of life, almost all in developing countries, and the perinatal mortality rate (PNMR) is used as an indicator of the quality of health service delivery. Clinical audit aims to improve quality of care through the systematic assessment of practice against a defined standard, with a view to recommending and implementing measures to address specific deficiencies in care. Perinatal outcome audit evaluates crude or cause-specific PNMRs, reviewing secular trends over several years or comparing rates between similar institutions. However, the PNMR may not be a valid, reliable and sensitive indicator of quality of care at the institutional level in developing countries because of variations in the presenting case-mix, various confounding non-health service factors and the small number of deaths which occur. Process audit compares actual practice with standard (best) practice, based on the evidence of research or expert consensus. Databases reviewing the management of reproductive health problems in developing countries are currently being prepared so as to provide clinicians and health service managers with up-to-date information to support the provision of evidence-based care. Standard practice should be adapted and defined in explicit management guidelines, taking into account local resources and circumstances. Forms of process audit include the review of care procedures in cases which have resulted in a pre-defined adverse outcome, know as 'sentinel event audit'; and the review of all cases where a particular care activity was received or indicated, known as 'topic audit'. These are complementary and each depends on the quality of recorded data. The forum for comparing observed practice with the standard may be external, utilising an 'expert committee', or internal, in which care providers audit their own activities. Local internal audit is more likely to result in improvements in care if it is conducted in a structured and culturally sensitive way, and if all levels of staff are involved in reviewing activities and in formulating recommendations. However, further research is needed to identify the factors which determine the effectiveness and sustainability of perinatal audit in different developing country settings. Almost half of all infant deaths worldwide occur during the first week of life, almost all in developing countries. The perinatal mortality rate (PNMR) is used as an indicator of the quality of health service delivery. Clinical audits are conducted with the goal of improving the quality of care through the systematic assessment of practice against a defined standard, leading to the recommendation and implementation of measures to address specific deficiencies in care. Perinatal outcome audits evaluate crude or cause-specific PNMRs, reviewing secular trends over several years or comparing rates between similar institutions. The PNMR, however, may not be a valid, reliable, and sensitive indicator of quality of care at the institutional level in developing countries due to variations in the presenting case-mix, confounding non-health service factors, and the small number of deaths which occur. Process audits compare actual practice with standard practice, based upon evidence of research or expert consensus. The authors discuss auditing perinatal care outcomes and processes, mechanisms for conducting perinatal audits, formulating recommendations, implementing change and reassessing practice, and the impact of perinatal audits in developing countries. |
| | |
Authors:
|
M Mancey-Jones; R F Brugha |
Related Documents
:
|
10172819 - Case-based quality management system for surgery, a bottom up approach. 10573599 - Evaluation and management of occupational low back disorders. 18390019 - State of the science on postacute rehabilitation: setting a research agenda and develop... 7804409 - A survey-based benchmarking approach for health care using the baldrige quality criteria. 14660519 - Indicators to improve clinical quality across an integrated health care system. 10161829 - Quality improvement in an era of payment reform. 16181169 - Predictors of overall quality of care provided to vulnerable older people. 15876179 - Educational needs of general practitioners in palliative care: outcome of a focus group... 9765169 - Comparison of potency of inhaled beclomethasone and budesonide in new zealand: retrospe... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Review |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Health policy and planning Volume: 12 ISSN: 0268-1080 ISO Abbreviation: Health Policy Plan Publication Date: 1997 Sep |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1997-11-14 Completed Date: 1997-11-14 Revised Date: 2005-11-16 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8610614 Medline TA: Health Policy Plan Country: ENGLAND |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 183-92 Citation Subset: H; J |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Epidemiology and Population Science, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Developed Countries Developing Countries Female Humans Infant Mortality Infant, Newborn Maternal Mortality Medical Audit / methods* Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / methods* Perinatal Care / standards* Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Social Change |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: A health care spirituality rooted in Biblical justice.
Next Document: Viewpoint: public versus private health care delivery: beyond the slogans.