Document Detail


The use of best visual acuity over several encounters as an outcome variable: an analysis of systematic bias.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20335608     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of the best of multiple measures of visual acuity as an endpoint introduces bias into study results.
METHODS: Mathematical models and Monte Carlo simulations were used. A model was designed in which a hypothetical intervention did not influence the visual acuity. The best of one or more postintervention measures was used as the outcome variable and was compared to the baseline measure. Random test-retest variability was included in the model.
RESULTS: When the better of two postintervention measures was used as the outcome variable with a sample size of 25, the model falsely rejected the null hypothesis 55% of the time. When the best of three measures was used, the false-positive rate increased to 90%. The probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis increased with increasing sample size, also increasing the number of measures used to select the outcome variable.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the best of multiple measures as an outcome variable introduces a systematic bias resulting in false conclusions of improvement in that variable. The use of best of multiple measures of visual acuity as an outcome variable should be avoided.
Authors:
Dara Koozekanani; Douglas J Covert; David V Weinberg
Related Documents :
24106998 - Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: a novel method in volumetric measurement of inf...
25195318 - Modeling evolution using the probability of fixation: history and implications.
10311078 - Variation in resource use within diagnosis-related groups: the severity issue.
20335608 - The use of best visual acuity over several encounters as an outcome variable: an analys...
21532988 - A mathematical model for foreign body reactions in 2d.
22444148 - Natural populations and inbred strains of tetrahymena.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-03-24
Journal Detail:
Title:  Investigative ophthalmology & visual science     Volume:  51     ISSN:  1552-5783     ISO Abbreviation:  Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-23     Completed Date:  2010-08-20     Revised Date:  2011-05-20    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7703701     Medline TA:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  3909-12     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Bias (Epidemiology)*
Endpoint Determination*
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Monte Carlo Method
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Probability
Visual Acuity / physiology*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;52(5):2217-8   [PMID:  21471431 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Culture, immortalization, and characterization of human meibomian gland epithelial cells.
Next Document:  Is gait during obstacle crossing adapted in individuals with long-standing reduced stereoacuity?