Document Detail


Urinary calculi: radiation dose reduction of 50% and 75% at CT--effect on sensitivity.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19251939     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the effect of 50% and 75% dose reduction on sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) for the detection of urinary calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA compliant study was institutional review board approved; informed consent was waived. Raw CT data from 47 consecutive patients (24 male patients, 23 female patients; mean age, 46.0 years) who underwent unenhanced CT for flank pain were collected. Original CT examinations were performed by utilizing an automated dose modulation algorithm. Reconstructions of raw CT data were performed at 100%, 50%, and 25% of the original tube current by using simulation software; tube currents averaged 177, 88, and 44 mA, respectively. All reconstructed examinations were randomized and evaluated by two radiologists blinded to the presence, number, location, and size of calculi. The opinion of an unblinded radiologist who separately reviewed the original examination and report and the electronic medical record served as the reference standard. One hundred eight calculi (85 renal, 21 ureteral, and two in the bladder) were present in 32 of 47 patients. Calculus diameter ranged from 0.14 to 1.32 cm (mean, 0.34 cm). The decrease in sensitivity was assessed between doses and was independently evaluated for all calculi and separately for calculi greater than 3 mm in diameter by using the McNemar test, adjusted for clustered data. RESULTS: For all calculi, the blinded readers demonstrated combined sensitivities of 91.7%, 83.3%, and 67.1% for the 100%, 50%, and 25% tube current reconstructions, respectively. For stones greater than 3 mm, combined sensitivities were 97.7%, 93.0%, and 91.9%, respectively, for the 100%, 50%, and 25% reconstructions. There was no significant difference between the 100% examinations and the 50% and 25% reconstructions for detection of stones greater than 3 mm (P = .106 and .099, respectively). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the 100% examinations and the 50% and 25% examinations for the detection of calculi greater than 3 mm.
Authors:
Michael W Ciaschini; Erick M Remer; Mark E Baker; Michael Lieber; Brian R Herts
Related Documents :
9423589 - Comparison of examination times between ct scanners: are the newer scanners faster?
16806419 - Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical ...
21833729 - (18)f-fdg positron emission tomography: potential utility in the assessment of crohn's ...
9421649 - Extended pitch thoracic helical ct 47.
11503089 - Peliosis hepatis: triphasic helical ct and dynamic mri findings.
1457539 - Three-dimensional display of hepatic venous anatomy generated from spiral computed tomo...
6663369 - Eye movements and neural remapping during fusion of misaligned random-dot stereograms.
20124179 - Positron emission tomography with [18f]fluorodeoxyglucose improves staging and patient ...
20444539 - Paraganglioma of the filum terminale presenting with normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article     Date:  2009-02-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  251     ISSN:  1527-1315     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2009 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-03-31     Completed Date:  2009-04-22     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  105-11     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Section of Abdominal Imaging, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Room A21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Body Burden*
Female
Humans
Male
Radiation Dosage
Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods*
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Urinary Calculi / radiography*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging.
Next Document:  Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk.