Document Detail


Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19233419     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: We compared the surgical outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in patients presenting with anterior crossing vessels with and without transposition of the crossing vessel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Evaluation of surgical success was based on validated pain scores, diuretic renography and imaging results, including excretory urography, computerized tomography or ultrasound. RESULTS: Anterior crossing vessels were identified in 48 patients (44.9%) and vessels were transposed in 18 (37.5%) (group 1). No transposition was performed in 30 patients (62.5%) (group 2). Mean radiological followup was 52.9 weeks in group 1 and 65.3 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.181). Mean pain score on a scale of 10 was 0.82 in group 1 and 0.74 in group 2 (p = 0.917). A Whitaker test performed in 3 patients with persistent pain was negative. Preoperatively mean differential function on the affected side was 35.1% in group 1 and 36.9% in group 2 (p = 0.133). Half-time was calculated as a mean of 46.3 minutes in group 1 and 49.4 minutes in group 2 (p = 0.541). In groups 1 and 2 mean postoperative differential function improved to 41.1% and 40.9%, and mean half-time improved to 7.43 and 8.03 minutes, respectively (p = 0.491). A comparison of preoperative and postoperative differential function, and half-time in each group showed a statistically significant difference. The radiographic and symptomatic success rate was 100% with no open conversion and recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty outcomes revealed similar success rates in terms of the change in symptoms and renal function in patients with or without anterior crossing vessel transposition. Transposition of crossing vessel should only be performed when the anatomical relation dictates and it should be an intraoperative decision.
Authors:
Ugur Boylu; Mathew Oommen; Benjamin R Lee; Raju Thomas
Related Documents :
15984699 - Diagnosis and laparoscopic repair of type i obturator hernia in women with chronic neur...
23961619 - Growth modification in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with face mask.
16232239 - Evaluation of the end colostomy complications and the risk factors influencing them in ...
21185789 - Preoperative weight loss in high-risk superobese bariatric patients: a computed tomogra...
24799109 - Evaluation of maxillary growth: is there any difference using relief incision during pa...
17950349 - Laparoscopy or conventional open surgery for patients with ileocolonic crohn's disease?...
10954099 - Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates. association with and pred...
24331329 - The influence of total knee arthroplasty on postural control.
10807329 - Vibration does not improve results of the canalith repositioning procedure.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2009-02-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  181     ISSN:  1527-3792     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2009 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-03-19     Completed Date:  2009-04-02     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1751-5     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Blood Vessels / abnormalities
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kidney Pelvis / blood supply*,  surgery*
Laparoscopy / methods*
Male
Robotics*
Ureteral Obstruction / etiology*
Urologic Surgical Procedures / methods
Vascular Surgical Procedures
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
DK 56842/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Are racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of nocturia due to socioeconomic status? Results of ...
Next Document:  Comparison of different extraction sites used during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.