Document Detail


Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20800992     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measures taken to deal with publication bias across different categories of systematic reviews published in 2006 and to compare these with reviews published in 1996.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: PubMed was searched for systematic reviews published in 2006; 100 treatment effect, 50 diagnostic accuracy, 100 risk factor, and 50 gene-disease association reviews were randomly selected.
RESULTS: The use of MEDLINE increased from 74% to 95%; checking references increased from 42% to 73%; use of Cochrane Library increased from 5% to 58%; and use of CINAHL increased from 8% in 1996 to 24% in treatment reviews, 20% in diagnostic reviews, 18% in risk factor reviews, and 0% in genetic reviews published in 2006. A 20% increase was observed for explicit searching of non-English-language studies in all reviews published in 2006. Efforts to search for unpublished studies increased to 61% from 35% in treatment reviews published in 1996. Twenty-six percent of the reviews used funnel plots or related methods to test for publication bias compared with less than 6% in earlier reviews.
CONCLUSION: Recent reviews show a significant improvement in the measures taken to prevent publication bias. However, few methods exist to deal with publication bias in the nonquantitative findings of systematic reviews.
Authors:
Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke; Chun S Kwok; Chun Pang; Lee Hooper; Yoon K Loke; Jon J Ryder; Alex J Sutton; Caroline B Hing; Ian Harvey; Fujian Song
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical epidemiology     Volume:  64     ISSN:  1878-5921     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Epidemiol     Publication Date:  2011 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8801383     Medline TA:  J Clin Epidemiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  349-57     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Faculty of Health, School of Allied Health Professions, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Covariate adjustment increases statistical power in randomized controlled trials.
Next Document:  Validation testing of a three-component model of Short Form-36 scores.