Document Detail


Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8609329     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to determine the probability of successful defibrillation at the upper limit of vulnerability and to evaluate a minimal safety margin for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator first shocks based solely on the upper limit of vulnerability. BACKGROUND: The upper limit of vulnerability is the strength at or above which ventricular fibrillation is not induced when a stimulus is delivered during the vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle. It has been proposed as an estimate of defibrillation efficacy because it correlates with the defibrillation threshold and can be determined with a single episode of fibrillation. METHODS: We studied 40 patients prospectively at implantation of transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators. Defibrillation threshold was defined as the weakest biphasic shock that defibrillated after 10 s of ventricular fibrillation. The upper limit of vulnerability was defined as the weakest biphasic shock that did not induce ventricular fibrillation when given at 0, 20 and 40 ms before the peak of the T wave in ventricular paced rhythm at cycle length 500 ms. After determination of the upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold, patients underwent six additional fibrillation-defibrillation episodes. The strength of five of the defibrillation shocks was equal to the upper limit of vulnerability; the strength of one of the six shocks was randomly selected to be equal to the upper limit of vulnerability plus 3 J. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was tested at the upper limit of vulnerability plus 3 J in 28 patients. RESULTS: The defibrillation threshold was 8.8 +/- 5.0 J (mean +/- SD), and upper limit of vulnerability was 11.3 +/- 4.6 J; the defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability were highly correlated (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). The success rate for the 200 defibrillation shocks with strength equal to the upper limit of vulnerability was 90% (95% confidence intervals based on proportion of successes in 40 patients: 86% to 94%). All five defibrillation test shocks at the upper limit of vulnerability were successful in 24 patients (60%); four of five were successful in 12 patients (30%); and three of five were successful in 4 patients (10%). All 40 test shocks and 28 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks with a strength equal to the upper limit of vulnerability plus 3 J were successful. CONCLUSIONS: The upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of the shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation (DFT90). A strength of 3 J above the upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimate of the minimal acute safety margin for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator first shocks.
Authors:
C D Swerdlow; T Ahern; R M Kass; S Davie; W J Mandel; P S Chen
Related Documents :
16133859 - Internal atrial and ventricular defibrillation during electrophysiology procedures.
10914379 - Management of atrial arrhythmias secondary to severe congenital heart disease with the ...
9051819 - Rhythm changes during resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in relation to delay ...
9091529 - Effects of myocardial ischemia on ventricular fibrillation inducibility and defibrillat...
9581739 - Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.
25336549 - Right ventricular cavity near obliteration in neonatal severe biventricular hypertrophi...
8665369 - Circadian rhythms and the onset of myocardial infarction: clinical implications.
2370259 - Endocavital cooling in intraoperative myocardial protection during extracorporeal circu...
19608489 - Ischaemic events and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Cardiology     Volume:  27     ISSN:  0735-1097     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  1996 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-05-30     Completed Date:  1996-05-30     Revised Date:  2010-03-24    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8301365     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Cardiol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1112-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electric Countershock / instrumentation,  methods*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
HL50259/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The variable contribution of functional and anatomic barriers in human ventricular tachycardia: an a...
Next Document:  Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s--their risk factors, stratification and survival in Cana...