Document Detail


Ulnar Variance: Correlation of Plain Radiographs, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Anatomic Dissection.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22119604     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: Several techniques used to measure ulnar variance on a posteroanterior wrist radiograph have been described. It remains unclear whether they accurately represent the true ulnar variance of the patient. The purpose of this study was to correlate ulnar variance measurements on plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and anatomic dissection. METHODS: Posteroanterior (PA) radiographs, coronal and sagittal CT scans, and coronal MRI scans were obtained on 8 fresh-frozen cadaver wrists. The ulnar variance was measured by 5 reviewers. The specimens were then dissected, exposing the wrist joint. The ulnar variance was measured directly on each specimen using digital calipers. The inter-rater reliability was calculated for each imaging modality. The bias for each imaging modality was calculated using the digital caliper measurements as the true ulnar variance. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability for each imaging modality. The average bias from the true variance was the following: PA radiograph, 0.77 mm; coronal CT, 0.96 mm; sagittal CT, 0.96 mm; MRI with articular cartilage, 0.73 mm; MRI excluding cartilage, 0.49 mm. The variance measured on all imaging modalities tended to underestimate the magnitude of the true variance. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar variance measured on coronal MRI best reflected the true ulnar variance as measured directly using calipers. The CT scans demonstrated the greatest deviation from the true variance. However, differences were small and might not be clinically meaningful. All imaging modalities demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability, with MRI being highest. All imaging modalities tended to underestimate the magnitude of the true variance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The imaged underestimation of true ulnar variance should be taken into account when performing surgical procedures that alter the relative lengths of the radius and ulna.
Authors:
Daniel K Laino; Catherine N Petchprapa; Steve K Lee
Related Documents :
21637054 - The value of fused spect/ct in the evaluation of solitary skull lesion.
3067114 - Magnetic resonance imaging stereotactic thalamotomy: report of a case with comparison t...
17538314 - The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a...
20211264 - A head phantom prototype to verify subdural electrode localization tools in epilepsy su...
14727124 - Preoperative diagnostic values of fine-needle cytology and mri in parotid gland tumors.
11598254 - Ct of the duodenum: an overlooked segment gets its due.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-11-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of hand surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1531-6564     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7609631     Medline TA:  J Hand Surg Am     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Exaggerated Inflammatory Response and Bony Resorption From BMP-2 Use in a Pediatric Forearm Nonunion...
Next Document:  Calcific Myonecrosis of the Upper Extremity: Case Report.