Document Detail

Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16115493     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Abnormal pharyngeal reflux of acid (PR) (as measured by pH monitoring) is associated with microaspiration, and is a good predictor of airway symptom response to medical and surgical anti-reflux therapy. However, in clinical practice the link between airway disease and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still based on the presence of typical symptoms (e.g., heartburn) and/or standard esophageal function testing (manometry and 24-pH monitoring). PR is rarely measured directly. We undertook this study to determine if typical symptoms and standard testing could reliably predict the presence of PR. METHODS: The study group consisted of 518 patients with suspected reflux induced airway disease evaluated from December 1998 through January 2002. Each patient completed a standardized symptom questionnaire, underwent esophageal manometry, and 24-h esophageal and pharyngeal pH monitoring. Patients were classified having abnormal pharyngeal reflux (PR+) if they had >1 episode of PR detected during pH monitoring. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients were PR+ and 337 were PR-. The most common symptoms, namely cough (PR +73%, PR- 68%), hoarseness (PR +64%, PR- 66%), and dyspnea (PR +59%, PR- 59%) were present with similar incidence in PR+ and PR- patients. The incidence of heartburn was 54% in the PR+ and 52% in the PR- patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed that abnormal esophageal acid exposure was a predictor of PR+ (P < 0.001). Neither the presence of heartburn or specific respiratory symptoms, the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or upper esophageal sphincter (UES), or amplitude of esophageal contractions predicted PR+. There was substantial variability in esophageal length (UES to LES), thus the placement of the distal pH probe from the LES varied considerably (median = 13 cm, 2-20 cm). Using established normal values of acid exposure at multiple levels of the esophagus, 24% of PR+ patients had normal amounts of esophageal acid exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Typical GERD symptoms, such as heartburn, and typical symptoms of aspiration such as hoarseness, cough, or dyspnea are not enough to positively identify PR. While patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure are three times more likely than those with normal values to have PR, abnormal esophageal acid exposure alone does not identify all patients with PR. Therefore, relying on symptoms and standard diagnostic testing may fail to identify patients with extraesophageal reflux. Pharyngeal pH monitoring should be considered for patients with suspected reflux-induced airway disease.
Brant K Oelschlager; Lily Chang; Charles E Pope; Carlos A Pellegrini
Related Documents :
17099353 - Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy: indications and technique.
1514453 - Radiographic pulmonary changes of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in elderly patients.
9561863 - Dynamic behavior of the provox and staffieri prostheses for voice rehabilitation follow...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2005-04-14
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of surgical research     Volume:  128     ISSN:  0022-4804     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Surg. Res.     Publication Date:  2005 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-08-23     Completed Date:  2005-10-20     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376340     Medline TA:  J Surg Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  55-60     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6410, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System*
Esophagus / physiology
Gastroesophageal Reflux / complications*
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Monitoring, Physiologic
Pharyngeal Diseases / diagnosis*,  etiology
Pharynx / physiology

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  A new alloantigen-independent control for chronic allograft nephropathy rat models.
Next Document:  Intraoperative determination of intestinal viability: a comparison with transserosal pulse oximetry ...