Document Detail


Two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft software are sufficiently valid for comparing protein and potassium intake between five European centres - results from the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20875188     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The use of two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft for standardised dietary monitoring in European countries has previously been proposed in the European Food Consumption Survey Method consortium. Whether this methodology is sufficiently valid to assess nutrient intake in a comparable way, among populations with different food patterns in Europe, is the subject of study in the European Food Consumption Validation consortium. The objective of the study was to compare the validity of usual protein and K intake estimated from two non-consecutive standardised 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft between five selected centres in Europe. A total of 600 adults, aged 45-65 years, were recruited in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, The Netherlands and Norway. From each participant, two 24 h recalls and two 24 h urines were collected. The mean and distribution of usual protein and K intake, as well as the ranking of intake, were compared with protein and K excretions within and between centres. Underestimation of protein (range 2-13 %) and K (range 4-17 %) intake was seen in all centres, except in the Czech Republic. We found a fair agreement between prevalences estimated based on the intake and excretion data at the lower end of the usual intake distribution ( < 10 % difference), but larger differences at other points. Protein and K intake was moderately correlated with excretion within the centres (ranges = 0·39-0·67 and 0·37-0·69, respectively). These were comparable across centres. In conclusion, two standardised 24 h recalls (EPIC-Soft) appear to be sufficiently valid for assessing and comparing the mean and distribution of protein and K intake across five centres in Europe as well as for ranking individuals.
Authors:
Sandra P Crispim; Jeanne H M de Vries; Anouk Geelen; Olga W Souverein; Paul J M Hulshof; Lionel Lafay; Anne-Sophie Rousseau; Inger T L Lillegaard; Lene F Andersen; Inge Huybrechts; Willem De Keyzer; Jiri Ruprich; Marcela Dofkova; Marga C Ocke; Evelien de Boer; Nadia Slimani; Pieter Van't Veer
Related Documents :
11518558 - Development of a validated food frequency questionnaire to determine folate intake.
14604218 - Reproducibility and validity of a simple checklist-type questionnaire for food intake a...
22327018 - Olanzapine and sibutramine have opposing effects on the motivation for palatable food.
1915198 - The validity of a food use questionnaire in assessing the nutrient intake of physically...
11518558 - Development of a validated food frequency questionnaire to determine folate intake.
3283288 - Effect of food intake on the relative bioavailability of moclobemide (ro 11-1163).
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-09-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  The British journal of nutrition     Volume:  105     ISSN:  1475-2662     ISO Abbreviation:  Br. J. Nutr.     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-25     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372547     Medline TA:  Br J Nutr     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  447-58     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Bomenweg 2, Wageningen 6703 HD, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Weight loss during tuberculosis treatment is an important risk factor for drug-induced hepatotoxicit...
Next Document:  Diet and risk of endometriosis in a population-based case-control study.