Document Detail

Two Functional Motifs Define the Interaction, Internalization and Toxicity of the Cell-Penetrating Antifungal Peptide PAF26 on Fungal Cells.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23349973     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
The synthetic, cell penetrating hexapeptide PAF26 (RKKWFW) is antifungal at low micromolar concentrations and has been proposed as a model for cationic, cell-penetrating antifungal peptides. Its short amino acid sequence facilitates the analysis of its structure-activity relationships using the fungal models Neurospora crassa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and human and plant pathogens Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium digitatum, respectively. Previously, PAF26 at low fungicidal concentrations was shown to be endocytically internalized, accumulated in vacuoles and then actively transported into the cytoplasm where it exerts its antifungal activity. In the present study, two PAF26 derivatives, PAF95 (AAAWFW) and PAF96 (RKKAAA), were designed to characterize the roles of the N-terminal cationic and the C-terminal hydrophobic motifs in PAF26's mode-of-action. PAF95 and PAF96 exhibited substantially reduced antifungal activity against all the fungi analyzed. PAF96 localized to fungal cell envelopes and was not internalized by the fungi. In contrast, PAF95 was taken up into vacuoles of N. crassa, wherein it accumulated and was trapped without toxic effects. Also, the PAF26 resistant Δarg1 strain of S. cerevisiae exhibited increased PAF26 accumulation in vacuoles. Live-cell imaging of GFP-labelled nuclei in A. fumigatus showed that transport of PAF26 from the vacuole to the cytoplasm was followed by nuclear breakdown and dissolution. This work demonstrates that the amphipathic PAF26 possesses two distinct motifs that allow three stages in its antifungal action to be defined: (i) its interaction with the cell envelope; (ii) its internalization and transport to vacuoles mediated by the aromatic hydrophobic domain; and (iii) its transport from vacuoles to the cytoplasm. Significantly, cationic residues in PAF26 are important not only for the electrostatic attraction and interaction with the fungal cell but also for transport from the vacuole to the cytoplasm, which coincides with cell death. Peptide containment within vacuoles preserves fungal cells from peptide toxicity.
Alberto Muñoz; Eleonora Harries; Adriana Contreras-Valenzuela; Lourdes Carmona; Nick D Read; Jose F Marcos
Related Documents :
9732323 - Interaction between haemoglobin and synthetic peptides of the n-terminal cytoplasmic fr...
2074733 - Expression of pre-s1, pre-s2, s and x peptides in relation to viral replication in live...
1931953 - Kinetics and regulation of two catalytic subunits of camp-dependent protein kinase from...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2013-01-21
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2013  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-25     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e54813     Citation Subset:  IM    
Fungal Cell Biology Group, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright: 2013 Muñoz et al
Received Day: 13 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 17 Month: 12 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2013
Electronic publication date: Day: 21 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Volume: 8 Issue: 1
E-location ID: e54813
PubMed Id: 23349973
ID: 3549957
Publisher Id: PONE-D-12-21121
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813

Two Functional Motifs Define the Interaction, Internalization and Toxicity of the Cell-Penetrating Antifungal Peptide PAF26 on Fungal Cells Alternate Title:Functional Motifs in the Antifungal Peptide PAF26
Alberto Muñoz1
Eleonora Harries12
Adriana Contreras-Valenzuela1
Lourdes Carmona2
Nick D. Read1*
Jose F. Marcos2*
Gustavo Henrique Goldmanedit1 Role: Editor
1Fungal Cell Biology Group, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
2Department of Food Science, Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Paterna, Valencia, Spain
Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Correspondence: * E-mail: (JFM); (NDR)
[conflict] Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Contributed by footnote: Composed the figures: AM EH JFM. Edited and approved the manuscript: AM EH ACV LC NDR JFM. Conceived and designed the experiments: AM NDR JFM. Performed the experiments: AM EH ACV LC. Analyzed the data: AM EH ACV LC NDR JFM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NDR JFM. Wrote the paper: AM EH NDR JFM.


Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and proteins are being intensively studied as alternatives for the control of microorganisms in medical, agricultural and food preservation applications [1][4]. Nearly all AMPs are cationic and amphipathic molecules with the capability of interacting with and disrupting anionic biological membranes, which potentially enable them to permeabilize and lyse living microbial cells. In the last decade, however, it has become clear that some AMPs also have additional effects on their target microbial cells in vivo, including more subtle and specific intracellular mechanisms [5][11].

Various AMPs have been demonstrated to translocate across the plasma membrane non-disruptively at low to moderate concentrations and result in a variety of different intracellular effects [12][17]. AMPs with these characteristics share biophysical properties with the so-called cell penetrating peptides (CPPs). This has brought into question the differences between antimicrobial and cell penetrating activities [18] and led to the definition of a new class of cell penetrating AMPs (CP-AMPs) [4]. Peptides initially known as CPPs, and also found to be taken up into mammalian cells, were later demonstrated to exhibit antimicrobial activity towards distinct microorganisms, and this activity correlated with internalization of the CPPs by the microbial cells [19], [20]. However, the link between penetration and antimicrobial properties requires further analysis. Interestingly, for selected AMPs such as the proline-rich apidaecin, the microbial internalization and killing activities seem to be separated, and peptide uptake was necessary but not sufficient for antibacterial activity [12]. An attractive hypothesis, therefore, is that this class of bioactive peptides are in fact dual molecules in which internalization determinants do not necessarily overlap with antimicrobial activity [6]. Experiments should address the identification of these (separate) determinants in model AMPs in order to establish the minimum amino acid sequence requirements for these different activities, if present. This should help in the design of “modular” domains with distinct functional capabilities for custom-designing improved AMPs in the future.

PAF26 is a synthetic, tryptophan-rich, cationic hexapeptide that was previously identified by a combinatorial approach against the fungal plant pathogen Penicillium digitatum[21]. It has been shown to enter cells of P. digitatum and perturb cell morphogenesis prior to cell permeabilization, but it is not lytic or cytotoxic to human cells [22], [23]. Recently, PAF26 entry routes into fungal cells were analyzed in detail using live-cell imaging techniques in the model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa[17]. This study demonstrated endocytic internalization of PAF26 prior to killing fungal cells, when the peptide was applied at low fungicidal concentrations. PAF26 is therefore a CP-AMP that possesses the determinants for both antifungal and cell penetrating activities in just six amino acid residues, and we have proposed it as a useful model to analyze these two activities as well as the relationships between them.

Treatment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with sublethal concentrations of peptides demonstrated the differential effects of the CP-AMP PAF26 and the cytolytic peptide melittin at the transcriptional level [24]. This study showed increased expression of genes involved in strengthening of the cell wall (a common response to different AMPs), arginine metabolism, ribosomal biogenesis and the unfolded protein stress response [24]. Deletion of specific genes altered the sensitivity of the yeast to PAF26. For instance, deletion of the ARG1 gene that encodes the cytosolic arginine succinate synthetase in the arginine biosynthetic pathway, as well as the deletion of other ARG genes, resulted in increased resistance to PAF26. Recently, increased endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production in the budding yeast was shown in response to PAF26 treatment and NO production correlated with peptide toxicity [25]. In addition, arginine-derived NO production was blocked in the Δarg1 mutant, providing a plausible explanation for its resistant phenotype.

In this study we took advantage of the small size and defined amino acid sequence of PAF26 to characterize the influence of the cationic N-terminal and the hydrophobic C-terminal motifs in its modes of internalization, intracellular transport and antifungal activity. By using PAF26 sequence analogs and analyzing their inhibitory activities and subcellular locations, we have defined three steps in PAF26 mode-of-action which are conserved in different fungi (the fungal models Neurospora crassa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus). We show that the peptide first encounters and interacts with the cell envelope (cell wall and/or the plasma membrane), subsequently enters the fungal cell, is transported to the vacuole, and finally exerts its killing activity after being transported to the cytoplasm.

Both cationic and hydrophobic motifs are needed for PAF26 activity

The antifungal peptide PAF26 was identified through a synthetic combinatorial hexapeptide library screen against phytopathogenic fungi [21]. Its sequence is optimized in terms of antifungal potency, high selectivity for fungi [26] and lack of toxicity towards human cells [22], [23]. Interestingly, two motifs are present in the PAF26 sequence: a cationic N-terminus (RKK) and a C-terminus composed of hydrophobic, aromatic amino acids (WFW), which together conform an amphiphilic AMP (Table 1). In this study, we designed two derivatives of PAF26 to characterize the roles of these N- and C-terminal regions in its antifungal properties. PAF95 was designed to neutralize the strong cationic N-terminal half of the peptide by substituting its three residues with neutrally charged Ala residues. Similarly, the C-terminus was modified in PAF96 by replacing the hydrophobic amino acids with Ala residues. As expected, the isolelectric point and net charge of PAF95 were strongly reduced while the hydropathicity index (GRAVY) also changed significantly for both derivatives (Table 1).

Following a previous analysis of the mechanisms of PAF26 cell penetration in the filamentous fungus N. crassa[17], we used this eukaryotic model to characterize the novel derivatives PAF95 and PAF96. A substantial reduction in the fungistatic and fungicidal activities of both new peptides in comparison with the parental peptide PAF26 was observed (Figure 1). Complete inhibition of conidial germination was achieved at ≥5 µM in the case of PAF26, whereas at a concentration of 30 µM, 74±8% and 56±6% germination were observed in the presence of PAF95 and PAF96, respectively (Figure 1A). Little or no killing of N. crassa conidia was observed after treatment with up to 20 µM of PAF95 or PAF96 (Figure 1B). This contrasted with the strong fungicidal activity of PAF26, which at 2.5 µM killed 81% of conidia.

In N. crassa cells the interaction and localization of PAF peptides are dependent on specific amino acid motifs

Confocal microscopy of fluorescently labeled peptides has allowed the visualization of AMP internalization by microbial cells [13], [27][30], [17]. The PAF peptides were covalently labelled at their N-termini with the red fluorophore tetramethyl-rhodamine (TMR) as part of the synthetic procedure. Labeling of PAF26 with the TMR fluorescent label did not significantly influence the activity of PAF26 [17].

The three peptides, each at a concentration of 5 µM exhibited different localization patterns with cells of N. crassa after 1 h of treatment (Figures 2 and S1). At this lethal peptide concentration (Fig. 1), TMR-PAF26 was detected throughout both conidia and germ tubes that became highly vacuolated and died (Figure 2B). Quantification revealed that 98±2% of the conidial population showed this characteristic staining pattern with TMR-PAF26 (Figure 2A). The non-active TMR-PAF95 that possessed the hydrophobic motif but lacked the cationic motif, was internalized by 56±10% of conidia. It accumulated within intracellular organelles that resembled the vacuolar system (see below) but did not stain the cell envelope or cytoplasm (Figure 2 and Figure S1). The remaining 43±8% of conidia showed no TMR-PAF95 labeling (Figure 2A). On the other hand, the non-active TMR-PAF96, that possesses the cationic but not hydrophobic motif, remained bound to the cell envelope (either or both the cell wall and the plasma membrane) and was not internalized by any of the conidia tested (Figure 2A, B).

Further experiments were designed to better characterize the subcellular location of the TMR-labelled PAF95 and PAF96 peptides by using them in combination with other fluorescent reporters of cell walls and organelles. The vacuolar localization of TMR-PAF95 was confirmed by co-localizing the peptide with the vacuolar probe cDFFDA (Oregon Green 488 carboxylic acid) (Figure 3A). Staining the cell walls with the chitin binding probe calcofluor white (CFW) and co-labelling with TMR-PAF96 showed regions of the cell envelope where the staining of the cell wall was exterior to the TMR-peptide labeling (Figure 3B, see inset box). This indicates that the TMR-PAF26 will initially interact with the outer region of the cell wall (as it is the first encountered layer) and would subsequently reach the inner region of the cell wall and/or plasma membrane.

PAF26 is fungicidal to and internalized by cells of the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus

We also explored the use of PAF26 as a candidate AMP to control the human pathogen A. fumigatus. We tested the PAF26 inhibitory activity towards A. fumigatus in an assay in which ungerminated conidia were exposed to increasing concentrations of the peptide and incubated for 5 h. At 37°C in liquid Vogel's growth medium, 95% of untreated conidia underwent isotropic growth and germinated to produce germ tubes. A significant reduction in germination occurred when conidia were treated with 1–5 µM PAF26, while 10 µM PAF26 completely inhibited germination (Figure 4A). Similar to N. crassa, conidial germination in A. fumigatus was not significantly inhibited by the two PAF26 derivatives, PAF95 and PAF96 (Figure 4A).

To characterize the interaction of PAF26 with conidial germlings of A. fumigatus, we exposed TMR-labelled peptides to a strain in which nuclei were labelled with GFP fused to the histone H1 (Figures 4B and 5). After incubation for 1 h with each of the peptides at a concentration of 5 µM, only the germlings treated with TMR-PAF26 were uniformly fluorescently stained throughout and were dead. Consistent with this, ≥95% of TMR-PAF26 treated germlings lacked any nuclear staining whilst those treated with TMR-PAF95 or TMR-PAF96 exhibited normal GFP nuclear labeling providing further evidence of PAF95 and PAF96 lacking antifungal activity (Figure 4B). Similar evidence of the nuclear breakdown coincident with a cytosolic PAF26 signal was also reported previously in a N. crassa GFP-H1 strain [17]. However, in marked contrast to what occurs in N. crassa (Figures 2B and 3A), we could not detect any signal of the inactive TMR-PAF95 within conidia or germ tubes of A. fumigatus. In N. crassa, TMR-PAF95 penetrated and was compartmentalized within the vacuolar network of 56±10% of cells (Figure 2A). This suggests significant differences with regard to the interaction of PAF95 with N. crassa and A. fumigatus germlings. In the former, the inactive peptide was able to interact and penetrate a proportion of the cell population while in the latter (Figure 5B) no interaction of PAF95 with cells could be observed. On the other hand, PAF96 behaved similarly in both fungi being located at the cell envelope with no evidence of cell penetration (compare Figures 2B and 4B).

Germinated and ungerminated conidia were treated with inhibitory concentrations of TMR-PAF26 and analyzed by time-lapse confocal microscopy. After 5–14 min of exposure to TMR-PAF26, faint red fluorescence indicative of peptide internalization were detected within spherical vacuoles which increased in size and intensity between 14 and 30 min (see arrows in Figure 5A and B). A total absence of co-localization between H1-GFP and TMR-PAF26 was observed. Towards the end of this 30 min period the green nuclear fluorescence in some of the nuclei started to disappear (see asterisks in Figure 5, Movie S1), indicating chromatin dissolution and probably cell death. At longer times of peptide treatment (∼1 h), TMR-PAF26 was seen to be transported from the vacuoles to the cytosol resulting in intense staining throughout the cells, and this was associated with the breakdown and dissolution of the nuclei and death of all of the cells (see PAF26 panel in Figure 4B and time course of Figure 5C).

The unicellular model fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae also shows differential susceptibility and interaction with the PAF peptides

We have previously reported that PAF26 shows antifungal activity against S. cerevisiae and that FITC-PAF26 is internalized by yeasts cells [24]. Similar to the results reported above for N. crassa and A. fumigatus, PAF95 and PAF96 showed a very significant reduction in antifungal activity against S. cerevisiae compared with that of PAF26 (Figure 6A).

Confocal microscopy showed that TMR-PAF26 exhibited different patterns of staining within the population of yeast cells of the reference strain BY4741 (Figure 6B). With 2.5 µM TMR-PAF26, 15–25% of cells had only their cell envelopes labeled, 60–75% showed labeling of their cell envelopes and also discrete intracellular vacuole-like structures, and 3–20% exhibit intense red staining throughout the cell and this correlated with cell death (Figure 7A). Localization of TMR-PAF26 within vacuole-like structures was coincident with that of the vacuolar probe cDFFDA (data not shown). TMR-PAF95 lacking the cationic motif did not stain these wild type cells at all, similar to the result obtained with A. fumigatus (Figure 4B), and TMR-PAF96 that lacked the hydrophobic motif exclusively labeled the cell envelope of yeast cells (Figure 6B). When TMR-PAF95 and TMR-PAF96 peptides were applied for longer times of incubation (i.e., 1 h, similarly to the A. fumigatus experiment in Figure 4B) and higher concentrations (up to 25 µM), the result was identical (data not shown) consistent with a complete lack of interaction (PAF95) or internalization (PAF96) of these peptides.

A previous genomic approach identified S. cerevisiae mutants with specific gene deletions that showed altered sensitivities to PAF26 (Table 2) [24]. They correspond to: (1) IPT1 that encodes a specific membrane sphingolipid; (2) several ARG genes from the urea cycle and metabolism of arginine (including ARG1); and (3) ECM33, which encodes a major cell wall GPI-anchored protein of unknown function. The mutant Δecm33 possesses a weakened cell wall and shows increased sensitivity to PAF26. In contrast, gene deletions of either IPT1 or ARG1 resulted in increased resistance to PAF26 [24]. Interaction of TMR-PAF26 with the S. cerevisiae Δarg1 or Δecm33 mutants showed a significantly different distribution of the TMR-PAF26 signal from that of the wild type BY4741 strain or Δipt1 strain (Figure 7A). Representative micrographs are shown to illustrate that the TMR-PAF26 fluorescence detected in Δarg1 cells was mostly located in discrete vacuolar organelles and at a higher frequency than in BY4741 cells. In contrast, Δarg1 cells exhibiting TMR-PAF26 staining throughout their cells were scarce and this was coincident with the lower sensitivity of this strain to PAF26 (Figure 7B). On the other hand, the complete staining of cells with TMR-PAF26 in Δecm33 cells was significantly more frequent (p<0.01) than the other strains, and this correlated with the higher sensitivity of this mutant to the peptide [24]. The three patterns of TMR-PAF26 distribution within cells of the Δipt1 strain were not significantly different to that of the wild type BY4751 strain. Staining of the three mutant strains with TMR-PAF95 or TMR-PAF96 produced similar results to those obtained with BY4741 cells (data not shown).


We have used the synthetic PAF26 peptide as a model CP-AMP to analyze the determinants of both antifungal and cell penetrating activities of AMPs. This rationale is facilitated by: (i) its small size; (ii) use of sequence analogs of PAF26 that show different activities [23], [26]; and (iii) the availability of mutants of S. cerevisiae[24], [25] and N. crassa[17] that show altered susceptibility to the peptide. This study provides significant new evidence demonstrating the intracellular mode-of-action of PAF26. It also shows that interaction and internalization of the derivatives of PAF26 (i.e. PAF95 and PAF96) per se do not result in cell death. Our data clearly define three steps which are necessary but not sufficient for PAF26 fungicidal action: (1) a cationic motif-mediated interaction of the peptide with cell envelopes that is also influenced by fungal cell wall components; (2) tryptophan-mediated internalization; and (3) intracellular toxicity which is linked to the cationic charge of the peptide and active transport from the vacuoles into the cytosol.

In a previous study, an alanine scan experiment in which each amino acid of the PAF26 sequence was substituted by alanine was carried out to determine the contribution of each residue to the peptide's antimicrobial activity [26]. The main conclusion was that no single substitution is a determinant for activity, since all the residues contributed individually to some extent. It was also evident that any cationic amino acid (Arg, Lys) exhibits a quantitatively more important contribution than aromatic residues (Trp, Phe). As an alternative approach, two new hexapeptides were designed for the present study in which either the cationic domain (RKK) or hydrophobic domain (WFW) was removed and replaced with three alanine residues to produce the two PAF26 derivatives, PAF95 and PAF96, respectively. Our study clearly demonstrated that both domains are necessary for antifungal toxicity. Neither PAF95 nor PAF96 showed significant antifungal activity towards N. crassa (Figure 1), A. fumigatus (Figure 4A), S. cerevisiae (Figure 6A) or the plant pathogen P. digitatum (Figure S2). It is obvious that these substitutions greatly modified the physicochemical properties of the parental peptide PAF26 (Table 1), including the cationic charge that has been previously reported as critical for the activities of most AMPs [5], [7][10]. A substantial detrimental effect was thus anticipated. However, the different localization patterns of the three PAF peptides led to significant new conclusions on the roles of the two main domains of PAF26 in binding to the cell envelope, cell penetration, transport to the vacuole, transport out of the vacuole and its antifungal activity.

The use of the model filamentous fungus N. crassa represents a very amenable experimental system for which a broad range of live-cell imaging techniques are available [31], [32]. PAF26 was internalized by N. crassa germlings and eventually after long-term (1 h) exposure to the peptide it was localized throughout cells and this coincided with cell death (Figure 2B). A recent study has described in detail the kinetics and internalization mechanisms of PAF26 into this model fungus [17]. The mode of PAF26 uptake by cells was shown to be concentration dependent with endocytic internalization playing a predominant role at low fungicidal concentrations and passive translocation at higher concentrations. Endocytically internalized PAF26 accumulated in vacuoles and was then actively transported into the cytoplasm where it exerted its antifungal activity. In the present study, PAF95 and PAF96 showed distinctly different localization patterns to PAF26 within living cells of N. crassa (Figure 2), which demonstrated the different roles of the two PAF26 motifs during its dynamic internalization process.

Neurospora crassa was unique in that it was the only fungus out of the four analyzed in which TMR-PAF95 was internalized in a significant number of cells (50–60% of conidia, Figures 2A and S1). Co-localization with the vacuolar stain cDFFDA showed that PAF95 was localized in the vacuolar system (Figure 3). In the other three fungi (S. cerevisiae, A. fumigatus and P. digitatum), TMR-PAF95 was not internalized (Figures 4 and 6, and data not shown). Positive charge is recognized as a key driving force for AMP activity because it promotes interaction with negatively charged microbial surfaces, and our data confirm this for all the fungi analyzed. The behavior of PAF95 in N. crassa suggests that additional, unknown cell envelope factors exist in this fungus, which allow the interaction, penetration and transport of a non-cationic peptide as far as the vacuole, albeit with less efficiency than PAF26. We hypothesize that these uncharacterized fungal cell wall/plasma membrane factors that facilitate the interaction of PAF95 would: (i) interact with the aromatic tryptophan and/or phenylalanine residues in the hydrophobic domains of PAF26 and PAF95, and (ii) relate to the observed increased sensitivity and faster inhibitory responses of N. crassa exposed to PAF26, as compared to other fungi (compare Figures 1A, 4A, and S2). Factors that reside in the cell wall and/or the plasma membrane may not only facilitate the interaction of certain AMPs with the fungal cell but they could also mask receptors/target molecules that the AMPs may interact with in this cell region. Examples of possible ‘masking’ molecules include cell wall glycoproteins that increase the resistance of Fusarium oxysporum to osmotin [33] and stress proteins of the PIR family that reduce the inhibitory activity of osmotin towards S. cerevisiae[34]. This may provide an alternative explanation for the increased resistance of A. fumigatus, S. cerevisiae and P. digitatum towards PAF26 compared to N. crassa that is highly sensitive to PAF26.

Remarkably, PAF96 labeled the cell envelopes in 100% of the cells of all the fungi analyzed and thus the cationic domain (PAF96 possesses only this domain) is involved in the interaction of PAF26 with this cell component. However, in N. crassa only, a cationic interaction is not essential for internalization because PAF95 (which lacks the cationic domain) is still internalized. Double labeling of TMR-PAF96 with the cell wall stain CFW indicated that PAF96 possibly associates with either the inner part of the thickened cell wall or at the plasma membrane (Figure 3B). This demonstrates that the peptide is at least able to diffuse through the cell wall. These observations, in conjunction with the lack of antifungal activity of PAF96, demonstrate that PAF26 does not exert its antifungal killing action at the cell surface, although the cell surface might be required for the interaction and thus antifungal activity as recently characterized in the antifungal plant defensin NaD1 [35]. PAF96 lacks the tryptophan-phenylalanine-tryptophan C-terminal tail of PAF26. The importance of tryptophan residues for the antibacterial activity of AMPs has been recognized [36] and they have been shown to facilitate the interaction with model micelles [37]. Recently, addition of tryptophan/phenylalanine motifs to short and cationic AMPs was shown to enhance bacterial killing [38], and also increase selectivity by lowering the toxicity to human epithelial and red blood cells [39]. PAF26 has been previously demonstrated to cause unusually low hemolysis and toxicity to human cells in cell culture [23]. Our work reveals that tryptophan residues are also involved in the internalization of this class of AMPs by fungal cells. In the previous alanine scan experiment with PAF26, the substitution of phenylalanine at position 5 (see Table 1) by alanine had only a minimal effect on antifungal activity [26]. This result indicates that phenylalanine is not likely to have a major role in peptide internalization/activity, and therefore points towards tryptophan being the critical residue required for cell penetration of PAF26 into fungal cells. Failure to enter microbial cells has been related to the lack of antimicrobial activity for other inactive AMP analogs such as derivatives of buforin II in E. coli[13], histatin 5 in C. albicans[40] and Sub5 in A. nidulans[41]. Only Sub5 contains tryptophan residues. It was shown that the amino acid substitutions that disrupted Sub5 antifungal activity involved tryptophan as well as arginine, lysine and valine residues, and therefore it was not possible to assign the observed phenotype to any specific amino acid change.

Although membrane lytic mechanisms are recognized as the primary mode-of-action for the majority of AMPs, increasing evidence supports the existence of AMPs, which exert an array of multifactorial effects including other specific interactions with the cell envelope as well as intracellular targets [5], [7][10]. In a previous study a transcriptomic approach was used with the model yeast S. cerevisiae to characterize the mode-of-action of PAF26 in comparison with the cytolytic peptide Melittin [24]. In the present study, we determined the sub-cellular location of PAF26 using high resolution confocal microscopy of three representative S. cerevisiae knockout strains previously identified as exhibiting increased resistance or sensitivity to PAF26 (Table 2). Our analyses correlated the percentage of cells in the cell population exhibiting complete cell labeling by TMR-PAF26 with differences in the sensitivity of the Δarg1 and Δecm33 mutants to PAF26 (Figure 7). They also revealed that the disruption of ARG1 is linked to increased PAF26 accumulation in intracellular vacuolar-like organelles which correlates with increased resistance to the antifungal activity of the peptide. Arg1p is a cytosolic enzyme, fundamental to the biosynthesis or arginine, metabolism/recycling of amino groups and the urea cycle. Moreover, blockage of the endogenous NO production derived from arginine was related to the PAF26-resistant phenotype of the Δarg1 yeast mutant [25]. Interestingly, the inactive PAF95 does not contain arginine residues and was trapped within vacuoles of N. crassa, wherein it was not toxic to fungal cells. Analyses of the kinetics of internalization of PAF26 [17] and histatin 5 [15], [42] indicated that the active transport from vacuoles to the cytosol is concomitant with cell killing. In the proline-rich AMP apidaecin, the internalization by bacteria and their killing were also separated and uptake into cells was necessary but not sufficient for antimicrobial activity of selected analogs [12]. From the available data we can hypothesize that containment of PAF26 and PAF95 within vacuoles preserves fungal cells from the peptide's toxicity and that the metabolism of arginine is involved in the transport of cationic peptides from vacuoles to the cytoplasm. Significantly, cationic residues are important not only for the electrostatic attraction and interaction with the fungal cell envelope but also for intracellular killing mediated by PAF26 transport from the vacuole into the cytosol.

As part of this report, we have demonstrated for the first time the activity and cell penetrating properties of the rationally designed peptide PAF26 against the human pathogen A. fumigatus and then extended our previous results with other model and economically important fungi [21], [23], [24]. Acute invasive pulmonary aspergillosis caused by A. fumigatus is a rapidly progressive and frequently lethal infection in immunocompromised patients [43][45]. However, existing treatments are limited to only a small number of antifungal drugs, such as azoles, echinocandins or polyenes [46], [47]. The identification of AMPs as promising pharmaceutical agents against this pathogen is currently being investigated [48][51]. Previous reports have demonstrated antifungal activity of AMPs against A. fumigatus in model animal pathosystems [50] and therefore this class of antifungal agents holds promise for the future treatment of aspergillosis. Different AMPs have also been assayed against the related model species A. nidulans[41]. In the present study, we found that the antifungal activity of PAF26 inhibits conidial germination in A. fumigatus (Figure 4A) at low micromolar concentrations, similar to that reported previously for other fungi [17]. PAF26 is in the lower size range of peptides that are active against this fungus although the acylated palmitoyl-Lys-Ala-DAla-Lys tetrapeptide has also been reported to be active against A. fumigatus[50]. The only previous examples of antifungal peptides that have amino acid sequence similarity to PAF26 are the larger Sub5 [41] and hLF(1–11) [49], which are cationic and contain two and one tryptophan residues, respectively.

The transport of PAF26 to the cytoplasm from the vacuoles of the A. fumigatus cells induced the disappearance of the H1-GFP fluorescence indicating the dissolution of nuclei, which occurred just before or was coincident with cell death (Figures 4B and 5). At no point was co-localization of H1-GFP and TMR-PAF26 observed indicating that PAF26 does not become specifically recruited to the nucleus as previously reported for the Tat (47–58) CP-AMP [19]. This is consistent with our observations that correlate killing with the active transport of peptide out of the vacuoles into the cytoplasm [17].

The novel findings described here can presumably be extended to other AMPs with similar physicochemical properties and functionalities as we have previously proposed [17]. It remains to be determined whether the C-terminal hydrophobic domain of PAF26 can direct the internalization into fungal cells of other unrelated peptidic or even not-peptidic motifs. Future experiments will address this issue as well as the relevance of using PAF26 as a model for studies on other cationic AMPs.

Materials and Methods
Fungal strains and growth conditions

Microorganisms used in this work were: Neurospora crassa WT 74-OR23-1VA matA strain (obtained from the Fungal Genetic Stock Center, FGSC#2489), Aspergillus fumigatus CEA10 strain (FGSC#1163) and a derivative with the histone H1 tagged with GFP (PGpdA-H1-sGFP) were kindly provided by Drs. Joanne Wong Sak Hoi and Jean Paul Latgé (Pasteur Institute, Paris), Penicillium digitatum strain PHI26 (CECT 20796) [52], and strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae listed in Table 2. Neurospora crassa and A. fumigatus strains were grown in standard liquid Vogel's medium [53] at 35°C and 37°C respectively, and P. digitatum on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Difco-BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) plates at 24°C until the culture conidiated. Conidia were collected and quantified with a hemocytometer to adjust to concentrations of 6.5×104 conidia/ml for N. crassa and 1×106 conidia/ml for A. fumigatus in 10% Vogel's liquid media, and to 2.5×104 conidia/ml for P. digitatum in 5% potato dextrose broth (PDB) (Difco-BD Diagnostics) media used in the antifungal assays. S. cerevisiae strains were grown in YPD (yeast peptone dextrose) plates and liquid media.

Antifungal peptides

PAF26, PAF95 and PAF96 peptides (Table 1) were purchased from GenScript (GenScript Coorp., NJ, USA) at ≥95% purity, and were synthesized by solid-phase methods using N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry. Peptides were also synthesized labeled with tetramethyl-rhodamine (TMR-PAF26, TMR-PAF95 and TMR-PAF96) by covalent modification of their N-terminus. Stock solutions of PAF26 and PAF96 peptides were prepared at 1–5 mM in 5 mM 3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic acid (MOPS, Sigma), pH 7 buffer and stored at −20°C. PAF95 and TMR-labeled peptides were firstly dissolved in a small volume of dimethylsulfoside (DMSO) according to the manufacturer's guidelines and then diluted to ∼200 µM in MOPS, to keep the DMSO concentration at less than 1% in the stock solution.

Dyes and chemicals

Fluorescent dyes included the cell death marker propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma, MO, USA), the vacuolar marker Oregon Green 488 carboxylic acid (cDFFDA) (Molecular Probes, OR, USA) and the chitin binding dye calcofluor white (CFW) (Sigma). Stock solutions were made in DMSO or water as appropriate. Working concentrations used in live-cell imaging experiments were 5 µg/ml for PI, 20 µM cDFFDA and 50–100 µg/ml for CFW.

In vitro antifungal activity assays

Fungistatic activity against N. crassa and A. fumigatus was microscopically analyzed by quantifying the percentage of germination (germ tube formation) after 3 h at 35°C for N. crassa, and after 4–5 h at 37°C for A. fumigatus exposed to the different peptide concentrations (see next section). Fungistatic activity against P. digitatum was assayed in 96-well plates as described [22]. Fungicidal activity of peptides towards conidia of N. crassa and A. fumigatus was determined by incubating peptide-treated conidia with the cell death marker PI, and analysis by wide-field fluorescence microscopy. Three replicas were analyzed for each treatment. A minimum of 100 conidia were analyzed for each peptide concentration in each replicate. Living and dead cells were discriminated from each other using the PI fluorescence, as described before [17]. Fungicidal activity against S. cerevisiae strains was assayed as described [24] by incubation of serial 5-fold dilutions from 1×106 CFU/ml exponentially grown cells treated with a 64 µM concentration of each peptide for 24 h, and subsequently plating onto YPD peptide-free plates. All antifungal activity experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analyses of the distribution of PAF26 across populations of S. cerevisiae strains were carried out with the software package StatGraphics Plus 5.1 (StatPoint, Hemdon, VA). If necessary, data were log transformed to fulfill the equal variance criteria of the ANOVA tests.

Live-cell fluorescence microscopy

Techniques of live-cell imaging at high resolution optimized for filamentous fungi have been carried out following previously described methodologies [54], [31], [32]. Time-lapse confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed using a Radiance 2100 system (Bio-Rad Microscience, Hemel Hempstead, UK) which was mounted on a Nikon TE2000U Eclipse inverted microscope equipped with blue diode, argon ion and HeNe lasers. Excitation and emission wavelengths were as follows. Excitation at 405 nm and emission at 420 nm (long pass filter) to visualize CFW fluorescence, excitation at 488 nm and emission at 515–530 nm (bandwidth filter) to visualize cDFFDA fluorescence, and excitation at 543 nm and emission at 580–700 nm (bandwidth filter) to visualize TMR-peptides and PI fluorescence. Simultaneous brightfield images were captured with a transmitted light detector. Where appropriate, Kalman filtering (n = 1) was used to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of individual images. Laser intensity and exposure was kept to a minimum to reduce photobeaching and phototoxic effects. Imaging was carried out a room temperature. Confocal images were captured using Lasersharp software (v. 5.1, BioRad Microscience) and were subsequently processed using ImageJ software (v. 1.44, MacBiophotonics, Canada).

Wide-field epifluorescence imaging was also performed with an inverted Nikon Eclipse TE2000E microscope (Nikon, Kingston-Upon-Thames, UK) equipped with a DXM1200F camera and the ACT-1 software for image acquisition. Propidium iodide fluorescence was excited at 550 nm using a CoolLED pE excitation system (CoolLED Ltd., Hampshire, UK). A 575 nm long-pass emission filter was used for visualization.

Live-cell imaging was performed with cells incubated in an 8-well slide culture chambers (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY). The culture chamber was mounted on the inverted microscope.

Supporting Information Figure S1

Representative confocal microscopy images from the data set of experiments shown inFigure 2A. Localization of 5 µM of the different TMR-labeled PAF peptides in N. crassa conidia 1 h after incubation with the peptides. The percentage of cells with different patterns of peptide localization are shown in Figure 2A.


Click here for additional data file (pone.0054813.s001.png)

Figure S2

Dose-response curves of the fungistatic effects of PAF peptides on P. digitatum. Conidia were incubated with the peptides PAF26 (black circles), PAF95 (white triangles) and PAF96 (white squares) in 5% PDB at 24°C in microtiter plates. Curves show the mean OD (492 nm) ± standard deviations of three replicate samples after 72 h of incubation. Other experimental details as described [22].


Click here for additional data file (pone.0054813.s002.png)

Movie S1

Time-lapse confocal microscopy of TMR-PAF26 internalization, uptake into vacuoles and associated vacuolar expansion in conidia and conidial germlings of A. fumigatus. In the left panel the movie shows merged fluorescence images for TMR-PAF26 (in red) and H1-GFP labeled nuclei (in green). In the right panel the movie shows the same cells imaged with brightfield optics. The peptide was applied at a concentration of 5 µM and images are shown from 5 min after peptide addition. The time course was recorded at room temperature with frames captured at 4.8 sec intervals over the period of 25 min.


Click here for additional data file (pone.0054813.s003.avi)

Authors thank Dr. Joanne Wong Sak Hoi and Prof. Jean Paul Latgé (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) for kindly providing the A. fumigatus strains.

1. Zasloff M, (Year: 2002) Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature415: 389–39511807545
2. Cotter PD,, Hill C,, Ross RP, (Year: 2005) Bacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol3: 777–78816205711
3. Hancock REW,, Sahl HG, (Year: 2006) Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotech24: 1551–1557
4. Marcos JF,, Muñoz A,, Pérez-Payá E,, Misra S,, López-García B, (Year: 2008) Identification and rational design of novel antimicrobial peptides for plant protection. Annu Rev Phytopathol46: 273–30118439131
5. Brogden KA, (Year: 2005) Antimicrobial peptides: Pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?Nat Rev Microbiol3: 238–25015703760
6. Otvos L Jr, (Year: 2005) Antibacterial peptides and proteins with multiple cellular targets. J Pept Sci11: 697–70616059966
7. Brown KL,, Hancock REW, (Year: 2006) Cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Curr Opin Immunol18: 24–3016337365
8. Yount NY,, Bayer AS,, Xiong YQ,, Yeaman MR, (Year: 2006) Advances in antimicrobial peptide immunobiology. Biopolymers84: 435–45816736494
9. Marcos JF,, Gandía M, (Year: 2009) Antimicrobial peptides: to membranes and beyond. Expert Opin Drug Discov4: 659–671
10. Nicolas P, (Year: 2009) Multifunctional host defense peptides: intracellular-targeting antimicrobial peptides. FEBS J276: 6483–649619817856
11. Wilmes M,, Cammue BPA,, Sahl HG,, Thevissen K, (Year: 2011) Antibiotic activities of host defense peptides: More to it than lipid bilayer perturbation. Nat Prod Rep28: 1350–135821617811
12. Castle M,, Nazarian A,, Yi SS,, Tempst P, (Year: 1999) Lethal effects of apidaecin on Escherichia coli involve sequential molecular interactions with diverse targets. J Biol Chem274: 32555–3256410551808
13. Park CB,, Yi KS,, Matsuzaki K,, Kim MS,, Kim SC, (Year: 2000) Structure-activity analysis of buforin II, a histone H2A-derived antimicrobial peptide: The proline hinge is responsible for the cell-penetrating ability of buforin II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA97: 8245–825010890923
14. Kragol G,, Lovas S,, Varadi G,, Condie BA,, Hoffmann R,, et al. (Year: 2001) The antibacterial peptide pyrrhocoricin inhibits the ATPase actions of DnaK and prevents chaperone-assisted protein folding. Biochemistry40: 3016–302611258915
15. Mochon AB,, Liu HP, (Year: 2008) The antimicrobial peptide Histatin-5 causes a spatially restricted disruption on the Candida albicans surface, allowing rapid entry of the peptide into the cytoplasm. PLoS Pathog4: e100019018974864
16. Sun JNN,, Li WS,, Jang WS,, Nayyar N,, Sutton MD,, et al. (Year: 2008) Uptake of the antifungal cationic peptide Histatin 5 by Candida albicans Ssa2p requires binding to non-conventional sites within the ATPase domain. Mol Microbiol70: 1246–126019006817
17. Muñoz A,, Marcos JF,, Read ND, (Year: 2012) Concentration-dependent mechanisms of cell penetration and killing by the de novo designed antifungal hexapeptide PAF26. Mol Microbiol85: 89–10622646057
18. Henriques ST,, Melo MN,, Castanho MARB, (Year: 2006) Cell-penetrating peptides and antimicrobial peptides: How different are they?Biochem J399: 1–716956326
19. Jung HJ,, Park Y,, Hahm KS,, Lee DG, (Year: 2006) Biological activity of Tat (47-58) peptide on human pathogenic fungi. Biochem Biophys Res Commun345: 222–22816678135
20. Palm C,, Netzerea S,, Hallbrink M, (Year: 2006) Quantitatively determined uptake of cell-penetrating peptides in non-mammalian cells with an evaluation of degradation and antimicrobial effects. Peptides27: 1710–171616500001
21. López-García B,, Pérez-Payá E,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2002) Identification of novel hexapeptides bioactive against phytopathogenic fungi through screening of a synthetic peptide combinatorial library. Appl Environ Microbiol68: 2453–246011976121
22. Muñoz A,, López-García B,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2006) Studies on the mode of action of the antifungal hexapeptide PAF26. Antimicrob Agents Chemother50: 3847–385517065623
23. López-García B,, Ubhayasekera W,, Gallo RL,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2007) Parallel evaluation of antimicrobial peptides derived from the synthetic PAF26 and the human LL37. Biochem Biophys Res Commun356: 107–11317336936
24. López-García B,, Gandía M,, Muñoz A,, Carmona L,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2010) A genomic approach highlights common and diverse effects and determinants of susceptibility on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to distinct antimicrobial peptides. BMC Microbiol10: 28921078184
25. Carmona L,, Gandía M,, López-García B,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2012) Sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the cell-penetrating antifungal peptide PAF26 correlates with endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production. Biochem Biophys Res Commun417: 56–6122120633
26. Muñoz A,, López-García B,, Pérez-Payá E,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2007) Antimicrobial properties of derivatives of the cationic tryptophan-rich hexapeptide PAF26. Biochem Biophys Res Commun354: 172–17717222805
27. Gyurko C, (Year: 2001) Killing of Candida albicans by histatin 5: Cellular uptake and energy requirement. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek79: 297–30911816973
28. Kragol G,, Hoffmann R,, Chattergoon MA,, Lovas S,, Cudic M,, et al. (Year: 2002) Identification of crucial residues for the antibacterial activity of the proline-rich peptide, pyrrhocoricin. Eur J Biochem269: 4226–423712199701
29. van der Kraan MIA,, van Marle J,, Nazmi K,, Groenink J,, Van't Hof W,, et al. (Year: 2005) Ultrastructural effects of antimicrobial peptides from bovine lactoferrin on the membranes of Candida albicans and Escherichia coli. Peptides26: 1537–154216112390
30. Powers JPS,, Martin MM,, Goosney DL,, Hancock REW, (Year: 2006) The antimicrobial peptide polyphemusin localizes to the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli following treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother50: 1522–152416569873
31. Freitag M,, Hickey PC,, Raju NB,, Selker EU,, Read ND, (Year: 2004) GFP as a tool to analyze the organization, dynamics and function of nuclei and microtubules in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol41: 897–91015341912
32. Hickey PC, Swift SR, Roca MG, Read ND (2004) Live-cell imaging of filamentous fungi using vital fluorescent dyes and confocal microscopy. In: Savidge T, Charalabos P, editors. Methods in Microbiology (Volume 34): Microbial imaging. London: Academic Press. 63–87.
33. Narasimhan ML,, Lee H,, Damsz B,, Singh NK,, Ibeas JI,, et al. (Year: 2003) Overexpression of a cell wall glycoprotein in Fusarium oxysporum increases virulence and resistance to a plant PR-5 protein. Plant J36: 390–40014617095
34. Yun DJ,, Zhao Y,, Pardo JM,, Narasimhan ML,, Damsz B,, et al. (Year: 1997) Stress proteins on the yeast cell surface determine resistance to osmotin, a plant antifungal protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA94: 7082–70879192695
35. van der Weerden NL,, Hancock REW,, Anderson MA, (Year: 2010) Permeabilization of fungal hyphae by the plant defensin NaD1 occurs through a cell wall-dependent process. J Biol Chem285: 37513–3752020861017
36. Strom MB,, Rekdal O,, Svendsen JS, (Year: 2000) Antibacterial activity of 15-residue lactoferricin derivatives. J Pept Res56: 265–27411095180
37. Schibli DJ,, Hwang PM,, Vogel HJ, (Year: 1999) The structure of the antimicrobial active center of lactoferricin B bound to sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. FEBS Lett446: 213–21710100843
38. Pasupuleti M,, Schmidtchen A,, Chalupka A,, Ringstad L,, Malmsten M, (Year: 2009) End-tagging of ultra-short antimicrobial peptides by W/F stretches to facilitate bacterial killing. PLoS ONE4: e528519381271
39. Schmidtchen A,, Ringstad L,, Kasetty G,, Mizuno H,, Rutland MW,, et al. (Year: 2011) Membrane selectivity by W-tagging of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta1808: 1081–109121192916
40. Jang WS,, Li XWS,, Sun JNN,, Edgerton M, (Year: 2008) The P-113 fragment of Histatin 5 requires a specific peptide sequence for intracellular translocation in Candida albicans, which is independent of cell wall binding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother52: 497–50417999963
41. Mania D,, Hilpert K,, Ruden S,, Fischer R,, Takeshita N, (Year: 2010) Screening for antifungal peptides and their modes of action in Aspergillus nidulans. Appl Environ Microbiol76: 7102–710820833782
42. Jang WS,, Bajwa JS,, Sun JN,, Edgerton M, (Year: 2010) Salivary histatin 5 internalization by translocation, but not endocytosis, is required for fungicidal activity in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol77: 354–37020487276
43. Latgé JP, (Year: 1999) Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis. Clin Microbio Rev12: 310–350
44. Roilides E,, Tsaparidou S,, Kadiltsoglou I,, Sein T,, Walsh TJ, (Year: 1999) Interleukin-12 enhances antifungal activity of human mononuclear phagocytes against Aspergillus fumigatus: implications for a gamma interferon-independent pathway. Infect Immun67: 3047–305010338518
45. Bignell E,, Negrete-Urtasun S,, Calcagno AM,, Haynes K,, Arst HN,, et al. (Year: 2005) The Aspergillus pH-responsive transcription factor PacC regulates virulence. Mol Microbiol55: 1072–108415686555
46. Gupte M,, Kulkarni P,, Ganguli BN, (Year: 2002) Antifungal antibiotics. App Microbiol Biotech58: 46–57
47. Latgé JP,, Aimanianda V, (Year: 2010) Problems and hopes in the development of drugs targeting the fungal cell wall. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther8: 359–36420377329
48. Helmerhorst EJ,, Reijnders IM,, Van't Hof W,, Simoons-Smit I,, Veerman ECI,, et al. (Year: 1999) Amphotericin B- and fluconazole-resistant Candida spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, and other newly emerging pathogenic fungi are susceptible to basic antifungal peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother43: 702–70410049295
49. Lupetti A,, van Dissel JT,, Brouwer CPJM,, Nibbering PH, (Year: 2008) Human antimicrobial peptides' antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 27: 1125–1129
50. Vallon-Eberhard A,, Makovitzki A,, Beauvais A,, Latgé JP,, Jung S,, et al. (Year: 2008) Efficient clearance of Aspergillus fumigatus in murine lungs by an ultrashort antimicrobial lipopeptide, palmitoyl-lys-ala-Dala-lys. Antimicrob Agents Chemother52: 3118–312618606837
51. Alekseeva L,, Huet D,, Féménia F,, Mouyna I,, Abdelouahab M,, et al. (Year: 2009) Inducible expression of beta defensins by human respiratory epithelial cells exposed to Aspergillus fumigatus organisms. BMC Microbiol9: 3319208266
52. López-García B,, González-Candelas L,, Pérez-Payá E,, Marcos JF, (Year: 2000) Identification and characterization of a hexapeptide with activity against phytopathogenic fungi that cause postharvest decay in fruits. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact13: 837–84610939255
53. Vogel HJ, (Year: 1956) A convenient growth medium for Neurospora. Microb Genet Bull13: 42–46
54. Hickey PC,, Jacobson DJ,, Read ND,, Glass NL, (Year: 2002) Live-cell imaging of vegetative hyphal fusion in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol37: 109–11912223195


[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g001.
Figure 1  Dose-response curves of the effects of the PAF peptides on conidial germination and viability of conidia of N. crassa.

(A) Percentage of germinated conidia was quantified by light microscopy 3 h after treatment with the peptides. (B) Percentage of viable cells after 3 h of peptide treatment was quantified using the cell death marker propidium iodide. The peptides used were PAF26 (black circles), PAF95 (white triangles) and PAF96 (white squares).

[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g002]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g002.
Figure 2  Localization of fluorescently labeled PAF peptides in N. crassa cells.

(A) Percentage of conidial population that do not show any TMR-peptide fluorescence signal (class “0”, striped bars), or show TMR-peptide fluorescence limited to cell envelopes (class 1, white bars), intracellular organelles (class 2, light grey bars), or filling the whole cytoplasm of the cells (class 3, black bars), after 1 h of treatment with 5 µM of each of the TMR-peptides. (B) Representative confocal images showing the localization of TMR-PAF26, TMR-PAF95 and TMR-PAF96 (in red) in conidia (left panels) and conidial germlings (right panels). For each peptide, the most common pattern of localization is shown (see A). Bars: 2 µm in conidia and 5 µm in germlings.

[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g003]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g003.
Figure 3  Subcellular localization of PAF95 and PAF96 in conidial germlings of N. crassa.

(A) Co-localization of TMR-PAF95 (in red) with the vacuolar marker cDFFDA (in green) after treatment of the germlings with 5 µM TMR-PAF95 for 1 h. Note co-localization within the vacuolar network in these merged images. (B) Localization of TMR-PAF96 (in red) and the cell wall stain CFW (in blue) after treatment with TMR-PAF96 for 1 h. Note that in regions of the cell envelope the calcofluor white staining is exterior to that of the TMR-PAF96 labelling (see inset) in the merged image. Bar: 5 µm.

[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g004]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g004.
Figure 4  Activity and localization of PAF peptides in A. fumigatus.

(A) Influence of PAF peptides on conidial germination. Percentage of germinated conidia was quantified by microscopy ∼5 h after treatment with the peptides at different concentrations. (B) Confocal microscopy of the localization of 5 µM TMR-labeled peptides (in red) in germlings of A. fumigatus expressing H1-GFP (in green) 1 h after treatment with the three peptides. Note that the left hand panels show brightfield images of germlings and the right panels show corresponding GFP-labeled nuclei in the same cells. The germlings were all treated for 1 h with the different PAF peptides before imaging. Note that the whole germlings treated with TMR-PAF26 are labeled by the fluorescent peptide, lack nuclei and are dead. This contrasts with both the TMR-PAF95 and TMR-PAF96 treated germlings that possess nuclei and are alive. The TMR-PAF95 treated germlings lack any labeling with the fluorescent peptide whilst TMR-PAF96 is bound only to the cell envelope of the germlings. Bar: 10 µm.

[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g005]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g005.
Figure 5  Interaction and internalization of TMR-PAF26 in A. fumigatus.

(A) Sequential images show the interaction and internalization of 5 µM TMR-PAF26 (in red) in actively growing conidial germlings of A. fumigatus expressing H1-GFP (in green) over a period of 25 min. (B) Detail of a germling present in (A) showing merged fluorescent and brightfield images. Note accumulation of TMR-PAF26 in vacuolar compartments (arrows) which undergo expansion and become more intensely fluorescent with time. This coincided with the initiation of the breakdown and loss of fluorescence of the nuclei (asterisks). (C) Detailed images of a germling undergoing these effects over a period of 5 min recorded 50 min after peptide addition. See also Movie S1 for the entire sequential time course of panel (A). Bar: 10 µm in (A) and 4 µm in (B) and (C).

[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g006]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g006.
Figure 6  Activity and localization of PAF peptides in yeast.

(A) Serial 5-fold dilutions of exponentially growing S. cerevisiae BY4741 cells treated with 64 µM of each peptide for 24 h, and subsequently plated onto YPD peptide-free plates. (B) Brightfield (images on the left) and corresponding confocal microscopy (images on the right) showing the localization in yeast cells (1×106 cells/ml) after treatment with 2.5 µM of each of the TMR-labeled peptides (in red) for 30 min. Bar: 10 µm.

[Figure ID: pone-0054813-g007]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.g007.
Figure 7  Differential localization of TMR-PAF26 in different S. cerevisiae strains.

(A) Graph showing the percentage of cells that show TMR-PAF26 fluorescence limited to the cell envelope (class 1, white bars), in intracellular organelles (class 2, light grey bars), or filling whole cells (class 3, black bars), after treatment for 1 h with the peptide for each strain (as labeled on the x-axis). Cell location was determined by confocal microscopy. Results represent the means ± standard deviations of three experiments, each performed in triplicate. Dots above bars indicate statistical significance as compared to each class in the BY4741 parental strain control. Black dots indicate percentage lower than BY4741 and white dots higher. Two dots indicate p<0.01, and one dot p<0.05. (B) Representative confocal microscopy images are shown from the data set quantified in (A). Two examples of classes 1, 2 and 3 are labelled in strain BY4741. Bar: 10 µm.

[TableWrap ID: pone-0054813-t001] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.t001.
Table 1  Peptides used in this study.
Peptide Sequence MWa Net chargea pIa GRAVYa
PAF26 RKKWFW 950.1 +3 11.17 −1.883
PAF95 AAAWFW 750.8 0 5.57 1.067
PAF96 RKKAAA 643.7 +3 11.17 −1.150

aCalculated values according to ProtParam at the Expasy Server (

[TableWrap ID: pone-0054813-t002] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054813.t002.
Table 2  Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene deletion mutants used in this study.
Strain a Genotype Description b PAF26 susceptibility c
BY4741 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 uraΔ0 Parental Strain
Y04007 Same as BY4741 ipt1Δ::KanMX4 Inositolphosphotransferase, involved in synthesis of the sphingolipid mannose-(inositol-P)2-ceramide [M(IP)2C] R
Y01750 Same as BY4741 arg1Δ::KanMX4 Arginosuccinate synthetase (arginine biosynthesis and urea cycle). Cytosolic. R
Y03215 Same as BY4741 ecm33Δ::KanMX4 GPI-anchored protein of unknown function. Cell wall/plasma membrane. S

aStrain name at the EUROSCARF collection (

bSummary of annotations found at the Saccharomyces Genome Database (

cSusceptibility of each strain to PAF26, as reported in [24]. “R” stands for increased resistance and “S” for increased susceptibility, respectively, as compared to the parental strain BY4741.

Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biology
    • Biotechnology
      • Applied Microbiology
      • Drug Discovery
    • Microbiology
      • Mycology
        • Fungi
      • Applied Microbiology
      • Microbial Pathogens
    • Plant Science
      • Plant Pathology
        • Plant Pathogens
      • Plant Microbiology
    • Proteomics
      • Synthetic Peptide
Article Categories:
  • Medicine
    • Drugs and Devices
      • Drug Research and Development

Previous Document:  Environmental Enrichment and Gut Inflammation Modify Stress-Induced c-Fos Expression in the Mouse Co...
Next Document:  Application of a qPCR Assay in the Investigation of Susceptibility to Malaria Infection of the M and...