Document Detail


Trunk-strengthening exercises for chronic low back pain: a systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16461178     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effect of lumbar spine-strengthening exercises on outcomes for people with chronic low back pain. METHODS: Two independent reviewers followed Cochrane Back Review Group and QUORUM Statement guidelines to complete this systematic review. Exercise effects were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Thirteen high-quality randomized controlled trials were included. For chronic low back pain, trunk strengthening is more effective than no exercise on long-term pain (SMD 0.95 [0.35-1.55]; intensive trunk strengthening is more effective than less intensive on function (pooled SMD: short-term, 0.58 [0.22-0.94]; long-term, 0.77 [0.33-1.20]). Compared with physiotherapy or aerobics, effects are comparable on pain and function. Motivation strategies increase effectiveness. After disk surgery, effects are significant for function (pooled SMD: short-term, 1.08 (0.76-1.41); long-term, 0.53 (0.03-1.04). For severe degeneration, trunk strengthening is less favorable than fusion on long-term pain (SMD, -0.50 [-0.99 to -0.01]) or function (SMD, -0.76 [-1.25 to -0.26]). Intensive trunk strengthening is less effective than McKenzie exercises for pain reduction (SMD: short-term, -0.29 [-0.54 to -0.05]; long-term, -0.31 [-0.55 to -0.06]). We estimated that moderate effect sizes (0.5) indicate that approximately 50% of participants and large effect sizes (0.8) indicate that approximately 80% of participants would achieve important improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk strengthening appears effective compared with no exercise. Increasing exercise intensity and adding motivation increase treatment effects. Trunk strengthening, compared with aerobics or McKenzie exercises, showed no clear benefit of strengthening. It is unclear whether observed benefits are due to tissue loading or movement repetition.
Authors:
Susan C Slade; Jennifer L Keating
Related Documents :
11931058 - Differences in electromyographic activity in the multifidus muscle and the iliocostalis...
21875828 - Exercise programming and counseling preferences of breast cancer survivors during or af...
3552598 - Polymyalgia rheumatica. its correct diagnosis and treatment.
3377158 - Enhanced brachial plexus blockade. effect of pain and muscular exercises on the efficie...
10203408 - Synergistic effects of vasopressin plus epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
7658948 - Muscular adaptation to concentric and eccentric exercise at equal power levels.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics     Volume:  29     ISSN:  1532-6586     ISO Abbreviation:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther     Publication Date:  2006 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-02-07     Completed Date:  2006-07-11     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7807107     Medline TA:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  163-73     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. elgarphysio@bigpond.com.au
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Exercise Therapy*
Humans
Low Back Pain / therapy*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The efficiency of multiple impulse therapy for musculoskeletal complaints.
Next Document:  Retropharyngeal abscess presenting as benign neck pain.