Document Detail


Trends in telemedicine assessment indicate neglect of key criteria for predicting success.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23115902     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: This innovative analysis aims to quantify the use of evaluation criteria in telemedicine and to identify current trends in metric adoption. The focus is to determine the frequency of actual performance metric reporting in telemedicine evaluation, in contrast to systematic reviews where assessment of study quality is the goal.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Automated literature search identified telemedicine studies reporting quantitative performance metrics. Studies were classified by telemedicine class; store-and-forward (SAF), real-time consultation (RTC) and telecare (TC), and study stage. Studies were scanned for evaluation metric reporting, i.e. clinical outcomes, satisfaction, patient quality and cost measures.
FINDINGS: Evaluation metric use was compared among telemedicine classes, and between pilot and routine use stages. Diagnostic accuracy was reported significantly more frequently in pilots for RTC and TC. Cost measures were more frequently reported in routine use for TC. Clinical effectiveness and hospital attendance were better reported in routine use for SAF. Comparison also revealed different evaluation strategies. In pilots, SAF favoured diagnostic accuracy, compared to RTC and TC. TC preferred clinical effectiveness evaluations and TC more frequently assessed patient satisfaction. Cost was only reported in less than 20 per cent of studies, but most frequently in RTC. Routine use led to increased reporting of all metrics, except diagnostic accuracy. Clinical effectiveness reporting increased significantly with routine use for RTC and SAF, but declined for TC.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction were reported frequently in telemedicine studies, but reporting of other performance metrics was rare. Understanding current trends in metric reporting will facilitate better design of future telemedicine evaluations.
Authors:
Duncan E Jackson; Sally I McClean
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of health organization and management     Volume:  26     ISSN:  1477-7266     ISO Abbreviation:  J Health Organ Manag     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-11-02     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101179473     Medline TA:  J Health Organ Manag     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  508-23     Citation Subset:  H    
Affiliation:
School of Computing and Information Engineering, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK. d.jackson1@ulster.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Managing clinical integration: a comparative case study in a merged university hospital.
Next Document:  Managerialism and professional strategies: a case from nurses in Portugal.