Document Detail


Trends in time to confirmation and recognition of new-onset hypertension, 2002-2006.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20733092     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Achieving full benefits of blood pressure control in populations requires prompt recognition of previously undetected hypertension. In 2003, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure provided definitions of hypertension and recommended that single elevated readings be confirmed within 1 to 2 months. We sought to determine whether the time required to confirm and recognize (ie, diagnose and/or treat) new-onset hypertension decreased from 2002 to 2006 for adult members of 2 large integrated healthcare delivery systems, Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Colorado. Using electronically stored office blood pressure readings, physician diagnoses, and pharmacy prescriptions, we identified 200 587 patients with new-onset hypertension (2002-2006) marked by 2 consecutive elevated blood pressure readings in previously undiagnosed, untreated members. Mean confirmation intervals (time from the first to second consecutive elevated reading) declined steadily from 103 to 89 days during this period. For persons recognized within 12 months after confirmation, the mean interval to recognition declined from 78 to 61 days. However, only 33% of individuals were recognized within 12 months. One third were never recognized during observed follow-up. For these patients, most subsequent blood pressure recordings were not elevated. Higher initial blood pressure levels, history of previous cardiovascular disease, and older age were associated with shorter times to recognition. Times to confirmation and recognition of new-onset hypertension have become shorter in recent years, especially for patients with higher cardiovascular disease risk. Variability in office-based blood pressure readings suggests that further improvements in recognition and treatment may be achieved with more specific automated approaches to identifying hypertension.
Authors:
Joe V Selby; Janelle Lee; Bix E Swain; Heather M Tavel; P Michael Ho; Karen L Margolis; Patrick J O'Connor; Lawrence Fine; Julie A Schmittdiel; David J Magid
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.     Date:  2010-08-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Hypertension     Volume:  56     ISSN:  1524-4563     ISO Abbreviation:  Hypertension     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-16     Completed Date:  2010-10-29     Revised Date:  2014-04-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7906255     Medline TA:  Hypertension     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  605-11     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Age of Onset
Blood Pressure / drug effects*
Blood Pressure Determination / methods,  standards
California / epidemiology
Colorado / epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypertension / diagnosis*,  epidemiology,  prevention & control*
Incidence
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Registries / statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
K12HD052163/HD/NICHD NIH HHS; U19 HL091179/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS; U19HL091179/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition, Hypertension, and Proteinuria. Is Endothelin the Smoking Gun?
Next Document:  Hypertension Induced by the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sunitinib Is Associated With Increased Circula...