Document Detail

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Deteriorated Aortic Bioprosthesis: Initial Clinical Results and Follow-Up in a Series of High-Risk Patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22304904     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a viable alternative in maximum risk patients. For those patients requiring aortic valve re-replacement, the "valve-in-valve" concept has been described. We report our experience with transapical valve-in-valve implantation in 7 patients with deteriorated aortic bioprosthesis at 1-year follow up. METHODS: Since November 2008, 210 patients received transapical TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis. Seven patients presented with deteriorated aortic valve bioprosthesis and received transapical valve-in-valve implantation. Mean age was 78.7 ± 0.8 years. Preoperatively, all patients were at New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III. For risk estimation, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (ES) risk scores were used and predicted high mortality (means ± standard error of the mean: STS(Mortality)21.6 ± 2.8%, ES(add)14.9 ± 1.1, ES(log) 52.6 ± 9.0%). Mean follow-up time was 517 ± 65 days (range, 280 to 799 days). RESULTS: Six patients showed a severely deteriorated bioprosthesis in terms of a stenotic valve (aortic valve area: 0.64 ± 0.04 cm(2), maximum/mean developed transvalvular pressure gradient: dPmax 63.3 ± 10.9mmHg, dPmean 40.4 ± 5.6 mm Hg). One patient's deteriorated prosthesis was highly insufficient. Procedural success rate was 100%, mean procedure time was 46.7 ± 12.3 minutes. Echocardiography revealed excellent hemodynamics of implanted prosthesis (dPmax 31.1 ± 5.5 mm Hg; dPmean 19.4 ± 4.3 mm Hg). Overall, postoperative course was uneventful. No patient died during follow-up, which ranged up to 26 months. All patients, except 1, remained in NYHA class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate feasibility and safety of the transapical valve-in-valve approach with excellent hemodynamic and clinical results. Decision making in a multidisciplinary setting is mandatory. Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to identify candidates benefiting from transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation.
Manuel Wilbring; Bjoern Sill; Sems Malte Tugtekin; Konstantin Alexiou; Gregor Simonis; Klaus Matschke; Utz Kappert
Related Documents :
23566674 - Preparing for the bundled-payment initiative: the cost and clinical outcomes of reverse...
22377664 - A prospective "oversizing" strategy of the edwards sapien bioprosthesis: results and im...
23386774 - Total ankle arthroplasty with combined calcaneal and metatarsal osteotomies for treatme...
24817164 - Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (maci) for chondral defects in the p...
7770364 - Use of adenosine to identify patients at risk for recurrence of accessory pathway condu...
8795374 - Enhancement of post trabeculectomy bleb formation by laser suture lysis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-2-3
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Annals of thoracic surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1552-6259     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-2-6     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  15030100R     Medline TA:  Ann Thorac Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Low back pain in 17 year olds has substantial impact and represents an important public health disor...
Next Document:  Finding a target for resveratrol.