Document Detail


Traditional finals and OSCEs in predicting consultant and self-reported clinical skills of PRHOs: a pilot study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12834416     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: As we move from standard 'long case' final examinations to new objective structured formats, we need to ensure the new is at least as good as the old. Furthermore, knowledge of which examination format best predicts medical student progression and clinical skills development would be of value. METHODS: A group of medical students sat both the standard long case examination and the new objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to introduce this latter examination to our Medical School for final MB. At the end of their pre-registration year, the group and their supervising consultants submitted performance evaluation questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty medical students sat both examinations and 20 returned evaluation questionnaires. Of the 72 consultants approached, 60 (83%) returned completed questionnaires. No correlation existed between self- and consultant reported performance. The traditional finals examination was inversely associated with consultant assessment. Better performing students were not rated as better doctors. The OSCE (and its components) was more consistent and showed positive associations with consultant ratings across the board. DISCUSSION: Major discrepancies exist between the 2 examination formats, in data interpretation and practical skills, which are explicitly tested in OSCEs but less so in traditional finals. Standardised marking schemes may reduce examiner variability and discretion and weaken correlations across the 2 examinations. This pilot provides empirical evidence that OSCEs assess different clinical domains than do traditional finals. Additionally, OSCEs improve prediction of clinical performance as assessed by independent consultants. CONCLUSION: Traditional finals and OSCEs correlate poorly with one another. Objective structured clinical examinations appear to correlate well with consultant assessment at the end of the pre-registration house officer year.
Authors:
Christopher S Probert; David J Cahill; Gemma L McCann; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Related Documents :
18791296 - "not from the college, but through the public and the legislature": charles maclean and...
12035006 - Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increas...
3835426 - The effective use of a questioned document examiner in medical malpractice cases.
10611616 - On being the statistician on a data and safety monitoring board.
12674456 - Saw palmetto for prostate disorders.
8037386 - A prospective in-field comparison of intravenous line placement by urban and nonurban e...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical education     Volume:  37     ISSN:  0308-0110     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Educ     Publication Date:  2003 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-07-01     Completed Date:  2003-08-25     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7605655     Medline TA:  Med Educ     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  597-602     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Clinical Competence / standards*
Curriculum
Education, Medical, Undergraduate / standards*
Educational Measurement / standards
England
Humans
Pilot Projects
Questionnaires
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Med Educ. 2003 Jul;37(7):580-1   [PMID:  12834411 ]
Erratum In:
Med Educ. 2003 Nov;37(11):1058

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Exploring perceptions and attitudes of senior medical students and interns to academic integrity.
Next Document:  Can undergraduate education have an effect on the ways in which pre-registration house officers conc...