Document Detail


Toward a common understanding: supporting and promoting education scholarship for medical school faculty.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  25413912     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
CONTEXT: Education scholarship (ES) is integral to the transformation of medical education. Faculty members who engage in ES need encouragement and recognition of this work. Beginning with the definition of ES as 'an umbrella term which can encompass both research and innovation in health professions education', and which as such represents an activity that is separate and distinct from teaching and leadership, the purpose of our study was to explore how promotion policies and processes are used in Canadian medical schools to support and promote ES.
METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the promotion policies of 17 Canadian medical schools and interviews with a key informant at each institution. We drew on an interpretive approach to policy analysis to analyse the data and to understand explicit messages about how ES was represented and supported.
RESULTS: Of the 17 schools' promotion documents, only nine contained specific reference to ES. There was wide variation in focus and level of detail. All key informants indicated that ES is recognised and considered for academic promotion. Barriers to the support and recognition of ES included a lack of understanding of ES and its relationship to teaching and leadership. This was manifest in the variability in promotion policies and processes, support systems, and career planning and pathways for ES.
CONCLUSIONS: This lack of clarity may make it challenging for medical school faculty members to make sense of how they might successfully align ES within an academic career. There is a need therefore to better articulate ES in promotion policies and support systems. Creating a common understanding of ES, developing guidelines to assess the impact of all forms of ES, developing an informed leadership and system of mentors, and creating explicit role descriptions and guidelines are identified as potential strategies to ensure that ES is appropriately valued.
Authors:
Elaine Van Melle; Jocelyn Lockyer; Vernon Curran; Susan Lieff; Christina St Onge; Mark Goldszmidt
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical education     Volume:  48     ISSN:  1365-2923     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Educ     Publication Date:  2014 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-11-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7605655     Medline TA:  Med Educ     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1190-200     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component mo...
Next Document:  Selection and study performance: comparing three admission processes within one medical school.