Document Detail


Timing of surgery in cauda equina syndrome with urinary retention: meta-analysis of observational studies.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18377315     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECT: The authors performed exploratory meta-analyses of observational cohort studies, evidence level III, examining whether earlier surgery makes a difference in outcome in terms of urinary function once cauda equina syndrome (CES) from a herniated lumbar disc has progressed to urinary retention (CESR). METHODS: Literature search identified 27 studies of CESR patients with clear definition of surgical timing. Relative risk (RR) could not be calculated in 11 studies, leaving 16 for meta-analysis. Urinary retention related to surgical timing at 5 breakpoints: 12, 24, 36, 48, or 72 hours. Urinary outcome was classified as Normal, Fair, or Poor. Meta-analysis was performed for "Event = Fair/Poor" or "Event = Poor." Eight studies allowed separation into CESR and incomplete CES (CESI), and 5 of these had enough data for meta-analysis to compare CESR and CESI. A random effects meta-analysis model was used because of heterogeneity across the studies. A best-evidence synthesis was performed for the 4 largest studies that had 24- and 48-hour breakpoints. RESULTS: For "Event = Fair/Poor," meta-analyses using the 5 breakpoints predicted a more likely Fair/Poor outcome for later surgery (RR range 1.77-2.19). The RR for later timing of surgery was statistically significant for 24-and 72-hour breakpoints and was elevated but not statistically significant for the other 3. For "Event = Poor," the RR range was 1.09-5.82, statistically significant for the 36 hour breakpoint only. Meta-analysis comparing CESR patients with CESI patients predicted a Fair/Poor result for CESR (RR 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.59-11.31). The best-evidence synthesis did not disclose reasons for differences in the results of the 4 studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports early surgery for CES and indicates that CESR and CESI cases should not be analyzed together.
Authors:
W Bradford DeLong; Nayak Polissar; Blazej Neradilek
Related Documents :
18425955 - Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
17253565 - Primary closure versus t-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration.
20927775 - Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma.
18667015 - Zinc as an adjunct for childhood pneumonia - interpreting early results.
9755995 - Continuous maintenance with low-dose lansoprazole versus helicobacter pylori eradicatio...
3415465 - Improved treatment of intra-abdominal abscess. a result of improved localization, drain...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of neurosurgery. Spine     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1547-5654     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2008 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-04-01     Completed Date:  2008-06-03     Revised Date:  2009-07-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101223545     Medline TA:  J Neurosurg Spine     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  305-20     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, California, USA. wbdelong@verizon.net
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cohort Studies
Humans
Polyradiculopathy / complications*,  surgery*
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Retention / etiology*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul;11(1):90-1; author reply 91-2   [PMID:  19569949 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Aortocarotid bypass for hemispheric hypoperfusion in a child.
Next Document:  Prospective evaluation of transabdominal percutaneous lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: i...