Document Detail


Timing of lung size assessment in the prediction of survival in fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18069722     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the prediction of postnatal outcome of fetuses with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia depends on the gestational age at assessment using the fetal observed to expected (O/E) lung area to head circumference ratio (LHR), by comparing the performance of the test at 22-23 weeks with that at 32-33 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Following prenatal diagnosis of isolated diaphragmatic hernia before 22 weeks, we evaluated the O/E LHR at 22-32 weeks and again at 32-33 weeks of gestation. Only cases liveborn beyond 34 weeks of gestation and with postnatal follow-up available until discharge from the hospital were included. Regression analysis was used to examine the effect on postnatal survival of O/E LHR, gestational age at delivery, side of the diaphragmatic hernia and intrathoracic position of the liver. Wilcoxon rank test for paired samples was used to compare median O/E LHR at 22-23 weeks and 32-33 weeks, in babies who survived and in those who died. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for the prediction of survival by O/E LHR at 22-23 weeks and at 32-33 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 53 pairs of measurements could be assessed. Univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that significant predictors of survival were the presence or absence of intrathoracic herniation of the liver, the O/E LHR at 22-23 weeks and the O/E LHR at 32-33 weeks of gestation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only O/E LHR at 22-23 weeks or 32-33 weeks provided significant independent prediction of survival. The median O/E LHR at 22-23 weeks was not significantly different from that at 32-23 weeks either in survivors or in babies that subsequently died in the neonatal period (P = 0.25 and P = 0.09, respectively). The area under the ROC curve for prediction of postnatal survival from the O/E LHR at 22-23 weeks was 0.789 (P < 0.001) and that for prediction from the O/E LHR at 32-33 weeks was 0.842 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In isolated diaphragmatic hernia, O/E LHR measurement at 22-23 weeks as well as at 32-33 weeks provides useful independent prediction of subsequent survival. The prediction of postnatal survival using O/E LHR is independent of the timing of assessment.
Authors:
J Jani; K H Nicolaides; A Benachi; O Moreno; R Favre; E Gratacos; J Deprest
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology     Volume:  31     ISSN:  0960-7692     ISO Abbreviation:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Publication Date:  2008 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-12-27     Completed Date:  2008-05-19     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9108340     Medline TA:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  37-40     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Affiliation:
Fetal Medicine Units of University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cephalometry / methods
Female
Gestational Age
Head / ultrasonography*
Hernia, Diaphragmatic / ultrasonography*
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Lung / ultrasonography*
Male
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Ultrasonography, Prenatal / methods

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
Next Document:  Confidence intervals for the risk ratio under inverse sampling.