Document Detail

Three-dimensional volumetric quantification of fat loss following cryolipolysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24535759     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive and well-tolerated treatment for reduction of localized subcutaneous fat. Although several studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this procedure, volumetric fat reduction from this treatment has not been quantified. This prospective study investigated the change in volume of fat after cryolipolysis treatment using three-dimensional (3D) photography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of subjects treated with cryolipolysis on the flank (love handle) was performed at Massachusetts General Hospital. Volume measurements were performed with a Canfield Scientific Vectra three-dimensional camera and software to evaluate the amount of post procedure volume change. Clinical outcomes were assessed with caliper measurements, subject surveys, and blinded physician assessment of photographs.
RESULTS: Eleven subjects were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent a single cycle of cryolipolysis to one flank. The untreated flank served as an internal control. The follow-up time after treatment was 2 months. The mean amount of calculated absolute fat volume loss using 3D photography from baseline to 2 months follow-up visit was 56.2 ± 25.6 from the treatment site and 16.6 ± 17.6 cc from the control (P < 0.0001). A mean absolute difference of 39.6 cc between the treated and untreated sides was calculated at 2 months post-treatment. Comparison of caliper measurements from baseline to 2 months post-treatment demonstrated significant reduction of the treated flank from 45.6 ± 5.8 mm at baseline to 38.6 ± 4.6 mm at 2 months post-treatment (P < 0.001). The untreated flank did not show significant reduction with caliper measurements demonstrating 45.3 ± 5.0 mm at baseline and 44.6 ± 5.1 mm at 2 months post-treatment (P = 0.360). No unexpected side effects or adverse events were reported. Post-treatment satisfaction surveys demonstrated 82% of subjects were satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Cryolipolysis is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective noninvasive fat removal methodology that on average leads to 39.6 cc of fat loss of the treated flank at 2 months after a single treatment cycle. Lasers Surg. Med. 46:75-80, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Lilit Garibyan; William H Sipprell; H Ray Jalian; Fernanda H Sakamoto; Mathew Avram; R Rox Anderson
Related Documents :
23111149 - Comparison of flunarizine and topiramate for the prophylaxis of pediatric migraines.
23698279 - Improvements in lung function with twice-daily aclidinium bromide: results of a long-te...
23439799 - A preliminary clinical evaluation of external snehan and asanas in the patients of scia...
23864249 - Comparison between zoledronic acid and clodronate in the treatment of prostate cancer p...
25035629 - Role of integrated approach of yoga therapy in a failed post-total knee replacement of ...
24007599 - Contrais: conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomised cont...
23749009 - Outcome of canal wall down mastoidectomy: experience in sixty three cases.
23855729 - Comparison of short- and long-term complications and survival following jejunojejunosto...
22588699 - Validation of an ultrasound-guided technique to establish a liver-to-coelom ratio and a...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2013-12-03
Journal Detail:
Title:  Lasers in surgery and medicine     Volume:  46     ISSN:  1096-9101     ISO Abbreviation:  Lasers Surg Med     Publication Date:  2014 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-02-18     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8007168     Medline TA:  Lasers Surg Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  75-80     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Imaging for acute pelvic pain in pregnancy.
Next Document:  A clinical and biological evaluation of a novel, noninvasive radiofrequency device for the long-term...