| Three is a crowd: the new doctor-patient-policymaker relationship. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22015887 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
A recent increase in legislative initiatives involving specific aspects of the practice of medicine is challenging traditional doctor-patient relationships. A Florida state law prohibiting physicians from asking patients about the presence of guns in the home could potentially result in real harm because of the risk of childhood injuries, domestic violence, suicide, and homicide. A number of states have specific language physicians are supposed to use when obtaining consent for pregnancy terminations. Some of these items required by law to be contained in the informed consent are not based on science, but instead on political beliefs. Other legislative initiatives involve issues as varied as hysterectomy consents, glomerular filtration rates, family planning, and palliative care. Laws that prohibit physicians from asking patients certain questions may be violating doctors' First Amendment rights. Laws mandating what information is contained in procedural consent forms and requiring certain scripts to be utilized may interfere with patients' ability to have accurate, unbiased, objective information to assist in their decision making. Physicians may be caught in the untenable position of balancing their professional and ethical obligations to their patients with their duty to obey the law as citizens. Physicians should be involved in legislative advocacy to try to prevent policy makers from legislating the practice of medicine. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Ethics should consider review of this evolving issue. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Erin E Tracy |
Related Documents
:
|
17199147 - The budapest meeting 2005 intensified networking on ethics of science: the case of repr... 17750397 - European science: pathogens lab chief stripped of duties. 12385137 - Death in a religious community. 22073817 - Global ethics and principlism. 11954647 - A national study of ethics committees. 1214267 - A new ethical approach to abortion and its implications for the euthanasia dispute. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Obstetrics and gynecology Volume: 118 ISSN: 1873-233X ISO Abbreviation: Obstet Gynecol Publication Date: 2011 Nov |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-10-21 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0401101 Medline TA: Obstet Gynecol Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1164-8 Citation Subset: AIM; IM |
Affiliation:
|
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia: A Management Algorithm Based on Risk Stratification.
Next Document: Of leaves and butterflies: how methotrexate came to be the savior of women.