Document Detail

Thinking about eating food activates visual cortex with reduced bilateral cerebellar activation in females with anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22479499     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Women with anorexia nervosa (AN) have aberrant cognitions about food and altered activity in prefrontal cortical and somatosensory regions to food images. However, differential effects on the brain when thinking about eating food between healthy women and those with AN is unknown.
METHODS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) examined neural activation when 42 women thought about eating the food shown in images: 18 with AN (11 RAN, 7 BPAN) and 24 age-matched controls (HC).
RESULTS: Group contrasts between HC and AN revealed reduced activation in AN in the bilateral cerebellar vermis, and increased activation in the right visual cortex. Preliminary comparisons between AN subtypes and healthy controls suggest differences in cortical and limbic regions.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that thinking about eating food shown in images increases visual and prefrontal cortical neural responses in females with AN, which may underlie cognitive biases towards food stimuli and ruminations about controlling food intake. Future studies are needed to explicitly test how thinking about eating activates restraint cognitions, specifically in those with restricting vs. binge-purging AN subtypes.
Authors:
Samantha J Brooks; Owen O'Daly; Rudolf Uher; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Vincent Giampietro; Michael Brammer; Steven C R Williams; Helgi B Schiöth; Janet Treasure; Iain C Campbell
Related Documents :
22475339 - Advanced nanoemulsions.
18589839 - Contact reactions to food.
23427859 - Temporal trends in daily dietary intakes of ddts and hchs in urban populations from bei...
18154559 - Positive rates to propyl gallate on patch testing: a change in trend.
17905669 - Do foods precipitate seizures? a cross-cultural comparison.
24520359 - Development and preliminary validation of chinese preschoolers' eating behavior questio...
20211329 - Dietary fish intake and incident atrial fibrillation (from the women's health initiative).
2200589 - Isotope fractionation by plants and animals: implications for nutrition research.
16366769 - Factors influencing the prevalence and handedness for throwing in captive chimpanzees (...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-03-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-04-05     Completed Date:  2012-11-19     Revised Date:  2013-06-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e34000     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Samantha.brooks@neuro.uu.se
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Anorexia Nervosa / diagnosis*,  drug therapy,  physiopathology*
Brain Mapping*
Cerebellum / drug effects,  physiology*
Concept Formation*
Eating
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Manifest Anxiety Scale
Middle Aged
Questionnaires
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors / pharmacology,  therapeutic use
Visual Cortex / drug effects,  physiology*
Young Adult
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Brooks et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received Day: 8 Month: 7 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 24 Month: 2 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 27 Month: 3 Year: 2012
Volume: 7 Issue: 3
E-location ID: e34000
ID: 3313953
PubMed Id: 22479499
Publisher Id: PONE-D-11-12931
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034000

Thinking about Eating Food Activates Visual Cortex with Reduced Bilateral Cerebellar Activation in Females with Anorexia Nervosa: An fMRI Study Alternate Title:Neural Responses in Anorexia Nervosa
Samantha J. Brooks13*
Owen O'Daly2
Rudolf Uher3
Hans-Christoph Friederich4
Vincent Giampietro2
Michael Brammer2
Steven C. R. Williams2
Helgi B. Schiöth1
Janet Treasure3
Iain C. Campbell3
Manos Tsakirisedit1 Role: Editor
1Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
2Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom
3Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom
4Psychosomatic and General Internal Medicine, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany
Royal Holloway, University of London, United Kingdom
Correspondence: * E-mail: Samantha.brooks@neuro.uu.se
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: SJB JT ICC. Performed the experiments: SJB. Analyzed the data: SJB OGO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VG MB SCRW. Wrote the paper: SJB OGO ICC. Proofread the manuscript and made comments: RU HCF HBS JT.

Introduction

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is defined by substantial emaciation due to deliberately reduced food intake and it has two subtypes: restricting (RAN) and binge-purging (BPAN) AN [1]. People with RAN are emaciated due to excessive food restriction. Those with BPAN have sporadic episodes of food consumption, yet are still emaciated due to purging and other compensatory behaviours (e.g. excessive exercise). Commonality between the two subtypes of AN are that they both excessively ruminate on cognitive strategies to control food intake. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is beginning to consistently show that women with AN, in response to appetitive stimuli (e.g. anticipatory food images, food consumption) during the scan have neural responses that indicate excessive ‘top-down’ prefrontal cortical (PFC) combined with reduced ‘bottom-up’ somatosensory appetite-related activation [2], [3], [4], [5]. Therefore, the neural basis of AN may involve interactions between regions that are associated with cognitive control and those with somatosensory responses to food consumption. However, few studies to date have examined how cognitions related to food intake impact on neural activation to food images in those with AN. For example, the neural substrates of cognitions associated with strategies for control may have an overly regulatory role in the restrictive behaviour seen in patients with AN. Furthermore, binge-purging activity observed in some AN cases (e.g. BPAN) may result from a reduced activation of the same regulatory mechanisms, perhaps in the presence of an enhanced motivational drive for food consumption.

Executive function deficits common in those with AN, associated with the PFC, such as excessive asceticism [6], cognitive rigidity/attention to detail [7] and cognitive rumination [8], are likely to be found in interactions between brain regions involved in the cortical Cognitive Control Network (CCN) and appetitive brain regions. The CCN is a network of PFC brain regions linked to executive function (e.g. selective attention, cognitive inhibition, and working memory) that likely regulate subcortical brain regions, which together are involved in appetite regulation (i.e. the striatum, amygdala, hypothalamus cerebellum). Activation of the basal ganglia, particularly the dorsal striatum (for impulsive responses) and the ventral striatum (for wanting and liking) have been associated with appetitive responses in obesity [9] and so one might expect aberrant or reduced activation in the striatum, which combined with irregular activation of somatosensory brain regions, is associated with the experience of anxiety and food restriction in those with AN. The cerebellum, particularly the vermis, is part of the bottom-up appetitive network and has a prominent role in feeding behaviour, particularly the drive to approach appetising stimuli [10], [11], [12]. The interaction between the CCN and bottom-up appetitive regions may determine individual levels of control over the desire for rewarding stimuli [13], [14], [15].

AN is highly comorbid with anxiety disorders [16] and people suffering with AN often experience anxiety, particularly Obsessive Compusive Disorder (OCD) [17] and alexithymia, or problems with emotional awareness [18] that are robustly observed in neuropsychological studies [19], [20]. Thus, caution is advised when conducting fMRI studies on those who receive pharmacological intervention for psychiatric disorders (e.g. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors [SSRIs] for anxiety) as it can alter the patterns of brain activation observed [21]. Nevertheless, underlying anxiety and interoceptive awareness (‘feeling of the body’) is the function of the insular cortex, which has extensive connections between the PFC, somatosensory regions and the cerebellum, such as in states of hunger, emotion and anxiety [22]. A cortico-striatal-insula neural pathway has been implicated in anxiety-related neural responses [23], incorporating the basal ganglia, ACC and insular cortex [24], [25]. However, despite evidence seemingly stacked in favour of the insular cortex being highly involved in the pathology of AN, the actual evidence is still unclear. For example, reduced activation in the insula (in comparison to healthy controls) is reported in response to the receipt of monetary reward and rewarding taste stimuli in people with AN [26], [27], but on the other hand, ratings of anxiety towards high calorie drinks positively correlate with greater insula activation in women with AN [28], while ratings of disgust in response to food stimuli do not correlate [29]. Prominent researchers in the eating disorders field propose that there is a ‘rate-limiting’ defect in insular cortex processing in those with AN, e.g. an inefficient orchestration of cognitive and somatic processing that fosters a balanced cognitive and emotional representation of the body [30], [31].

Against this background, fMRI studies of those who have recovered from AN (e.g. weight gain or reduction of dysfunctional cognitions) show a converse pattern of activation in response to appetitive stimuli, potentially indicative of restored brain function. For example, an increased neural response in the dorsal and ventral striatum, insular cortex and occipital lobe has been reported in comparison to healthy subjects [27], [32]. Another fMRI study using a Region of Interest approach and ingestion of liquid continued to find reduced insular cortex, and striatal activation in comparison to healthy controls [26]. In one fMRI study with food images, comparing those recovered from RAN to healthy controls, an increased medial prefrontal and ACC activation was observed, as well as reduced activation in the inferior parietal lobe, whereas in comparison to those chronically ill, the recovered females had differential frontal and ACC activation [29]. Thus, it might be that bottom-up appetitive neural responses are more prone to normalise following recovery, whereas frontal regions are prone to chronic functional effects specific to risk for developing AN, that are independent of nutritional status (or perhaps exacerbated by starvation). This fits the clinical picture that cognitive dysfunction is one of the main risk factors for AN, appearing before emaciation, and is the last, if ever, to normalise following weight gain [33]. Thus, by asking females to think about eating food during an fMRI paradigm, rather than merely observe food images (as with other previous fMRI studies), we might hone in on the neural mechanisms that are at the core and beginnings of excessive food restriction.

A recent clinical review of neuroimaging studies of those ill with AN [34] reveals that the frontal, parietal and bilateral anterior cingulate cortices are most susceptible to altered neural activation within the subtypes of AN (RAN and BPAN). However, when neural activation is examined in a heterogeneous AN group (e.g. not separating the subtypes) another neural pattern emerges, with the main difference being reduced function/metabolism in the temporal lobe. Therefore, it is also important to examine neural activation in a whole AN group, but also to separate the analyses for the distinct subtypes. Generally, fronto-temporal and somatosensory cortical regions are proposed to interact with basic appetitive brain regions, to predict how the value of a stimulus might affect body state, and also to determine the appetitive needs of the organism, and if these interacting cognitive-arousal systems are awry, deficits in interoceptive awareness and maladjusted reward processing, commonly observed in those with AN [3], might occur. By using a novel fMRI paradigm, adapted from a symptom provocation fMRI study that was first used in those with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) [35] for the first time we examine the role of cognitions (or thoughts about eating) in those with AN while they view images of food. We propose to test explicitly, which regions of the CCN interact with appetitive brain regions. In a previous publication we show reduced striatal and insular responses when thinking about eating food, in females with AN compared to females with bulimia nervosa, and that within groups, healthy females have greater appetitive responses to food (vs. non food), whereas females with AN also have an increased right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) response [36]. Here, we will extend our previous work by comparing females with AN to healthy controls, and conduct preliminary comparison analyses on the subtypes. This should further strengthen our understanding of the neural circuitry of AN, and help to shape treatment that specifically addresses thoughts about eating.

Thus, in order to examine how cognitive systems interact with reward and appetitive systems in females with AN the present novel study (utilising the cognitive factor of thinking about eating the food shown in images) tested the following hypothesis: 1) In women with AN (in comparison to HC), in response to thinking about eating food shown in food (vs. non-food) images, there will be greater activation in regions of the CCN that are linked to cognitive inhibition (e.g. DLPFC) and cognitive evaluation of reward expectancy (e.g. ACC) and reduced activation in regions associated with appetitive and somatosensory impulsive responses (e.g. dorsal striatum, insular cortex, cerebellar vermis). 2) Women with AN (in comparison to HC) will report higher levels of anxiety when viewing food images and their levels of anxiety will correlate with CCN and insular cortex activation.

As a second exploratory step, we have separated our main cohort of AN females into two smaller groups of women with RAN (n = 11) and BPAN (n = 7) and hypothesise that food stimuli will elicit greater activation in the CCN in RAN, while in those with BPAN there will be greater activation in appetitive and somatosensory regions.


Methods
Ethics statement

This study was approved by the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Trust Ethics Committee, study number: 297/02. Additionally, the study adhered to the guidelines as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was required from all participants, as approved by the SLaM ethics committee, and they were reimbursed for their participation.

Participants

42 right-handed females aged 16–50 years participated in the study, 24 healthy controls (HC) who did not have a history of psychiatric disorder and who were within the normal BMI, and 18 with a current DSM-IV diagnosis of AN. The AN group included 11 with a diagnosis of restricting AN (RAN) and 7 with binge-purging AN (BPAN). Women with AN were receiving inpatient treatment at the Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Trust. Diagnosis of AN (and subtype) was primarily made by a consultant psychiatrist, and confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [37]. All participants completed self-report questionnaires (see below) before the experiment. The HC volunteers were recruited from college students who responded to an advertisement. The women were matched for age and IQ and were instructed to eat lunch, but not to eat or drink anything containing caffeine or other stimulants for two hours, or to drink alcohol for twenty-four hours prior to the experiment. Exclusion criteria were a history of head trauma, hearing or visual impairments, neurological disease, metallic implants, claustrophobia and psychotropic medication other than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Since it has been shown that pharmacological intervention can significantly alter the pattern of neural activation observed in fMRI studies [21], we conducted post-hoc t-test analyses (on brain regions that were significantly different between AN and HC) between those AN patients who were taking SSRI medication and those who were not (see results section). This was done to ensure that the brain activation we observed was due to having AN and not due to pharmacological effects. Participants gave written informed consent, as approved by the SLaM NHS Trust Ethics Committee, and were paid £30 for their participation. Due to technical issues, and one participant feeling claustrophobic and withdrawing from the experiment, 5 women with AN (3 with RAN and 2 with BPAN) and 3 HC women were excluded: thus, 18 women with AN (11 with RAN, 7 with BPAN) and 24 HC women contributed to the analysis.

Stimuli

72 colour photographs of high and low calorie, sweet and savoury food (e.g. hamburgers, chocolate brownies, sandwiches) were presented on white plates and a blue background in random order: these were created by the authors. The control condition was made up of 72 colour photographs of non-food items (e.g. a stapler, yellow clothes pegs) on white plates and a blue background (created by the authors). Food and non-food items were selected and matched according to colour and visual structure (e.g. yellow clothes pegs on a plate matched with chips on a plate). All the images are available on request [36]. See Supplementary Table S1 for the list of images used.

Questionnaire Measures
The Eating Disorders Examination – Questionnaire ([EDE-Q,[38])])

This is a 36-item measure of dysfunctional behaviour and cognitions related to eating, with sub-scales: eating concern, shape concern, weight concern and restrained eating, together with a global eating disorder score. Questions are scored between 0–6, with a high score indicating greater eating disorder pathology.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS,[39])

This is a 14-item self-report measure with 7 related to anxiety and 7 related to depression. Individual questions are scored on a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety or depression.

The Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis-Researcher Version (SCID-R) [37]

This structured interview is used to diagnose AN, for general screening, and to obtain demographic information. Duration of illness is the time between diagnosis of AN and the time of the scan. It is noted that AN symptoms are most likely present before the formal diagnosis, but this measure gives a systematic score of illness duration.

Procedure

We conducted the scans between 1.30 and 4 pm. Images were presented on a rear-projection screen and viewed through a double-mirror periscope attached to the headcoil. Images (food versus non-food) were presented during the same scanning period. An AB block-design of 6 blocks for the experimental condition (food images [A]) and 6 blocks for the control condition (non-food images [B]) was used: blocks were alternated between the experimental and control conditions. Each block comprised of 12 images presented without a break in between, for 3 seconds, i.e. images for each condition were presented continuously for 36 seconds. At the beginning of each block a ‘partially silent’ period of 8 seconds, and another partial silent period for 8 seconds at the end of each block (where no data was acquired and the Echo Planar Image [EPI] readout was disabled) was used to present audio stimuli and to obtain verbal responses from each participant. During these partially silent periods, slice selection, Radio Frequency (RF) pulse and gradients continued in order to maintain the MR signal in a steady state and to allow data collection to follow a comparable strength across subsequent volumes. Audio stimuli was pre-recorded by an adult female, asking participants to a) imagine eating the food in the images, and b) imagine using the non food items. For each instruction, 4 separate but semantically similar phrases were given via headphones. In the second partially silent period (at the end of each block), participants were asked to rate how anxious they felt on a scale of 0–10: participants responded verbally. The duration of each block was 52 seconds (36 seconds of stimuli and two 8 second periods of ‘partial silence’), repeated 12 times (food versus non-food): total duration of the presentation of food versus non-food images was therefore 10.4 minutes.

Image acquisition

All fMRI data was acquired on a GE Signa 1.5 Tesla scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) housed at the Centre for Neuroimaging Science (CNS) Building, King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus. T2* - weighted images depicting Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) contrast were acquired with a TR of 4 seconds (repetition time) with an in-plane resolution of 3.75 mm×3.75 mm. The echo time was 40 msec and the flip angle was 90°. Whole brain coverage was acquired in 43 slices (slice thickness 3 mm, interslice gap 0.3 mm). Fifty-four T2*-weighted whole brain volumes were acquired in each of the two conditions in both experiments.

Data analysis

Data was analysed with the XBAM software developed at the Institute of Psychiatry [40], [41], [42]. Analysis based on 3D clusters provides a more powerful measure of brain activation that take place over a number of contiguous voxels, as opposed to statistics computed using information from a single voxel [43] and so we used a cluster-based approach. Parametric distribution is not known for cluster mass, and also group fMRI data is not often normally distributed [44] and so a non-parametric, permuation-based analysis was used in this case, to assess statistical significance. The parametric approach available within SPM software (Institute of Neurology, UCL, London: www.fil.ucl.ac.uk/spm) limits to voxel level statistics, and may not be as sensitive as XBAM for detecting neural differences in response to emotional stimuli [45] and so the XBAM software was deemed to be the best statistical approach in this case. Following motion correction, the estimated BOLD effect was modelled by two Poisson functions with haemodynamic delays of 4 and 8 seconds. The least-squares model of the weighted sum of these two functions was compared with the signal in each voxel to obtain a goodness of fit statistic. The distribution of this statistic under the null hypothesis was calculated by wavelet-based resampling of the time series and refitting the models to the resampled data. Active versus control conditions were analysed in Whole Brain generic group activation maps, and these were constructed by mapping the observed and randomised test statistics into standard space, and then by calculating and testing median activation maps. Use of medians prevented the interfering effects of outliers. Between-group differences were generated using a local 3D cluster analysis: this prevented large brain regions, such as the visual cortex from biasing the randomised null distribution and thus enabled the detection of smaller regional neural activations. Cluster-level inference with data randomisation between groups was used to determine the sampling distribution of group differences under the null hypothesis. Voxel- and cluster-wise corrections (using a more stringent False Discovery Rate [FDR] threshold correction at p = 0.01 than the default p = 0.05) were applied (due to small group numbers) to ensure that data was significant at the rate of one or less false positive 3D cluster per brain.

Self-reported data for within and between-subject differences were calculated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVAs) and post-hoc t-tests to confirm the direction of the differences. Examination of associations between continuous variables was calculated using the Spearman's rank non-parametric correlation coefficient (Spearman's Rho = . Associations were deemed significant if correlations met the p-value threshold after Bonferroni correction.


Results
Sample characteristics

Preliminary data from 18 women with AN (11 RAN, 7 BPAN) and 24 HC were analysed. Due to time and financial constraints of the study we were unable to increase the subgroup numbers to 12 to meet the minimum p = 0.05 threshold for eighty percent power per voxel [46]. However, we emphasise that the AN subgroup data is exploratory and designed to generate robust hypotheses for future studies. To increase the power of the data we report, we applied stringent voxel- and cluster-wise False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction to ensure that, despite the small sample sizes only highly significant data are reported, and we give effect size data in the table. The main focus of this paper is on the AN v HC contrasts. We present AN and HC group data in our previous publication, but the difference between this paper and the previous paper is that in the previous paper we instead focus on AN vs. bulimia nervosa (BN) and HC v BN neural activation contrasts [36]. See Table 1 for demographic and behavioural data.

As expected women with AN had a significantly lower BMI than HC (p<0.001), and women with RAN had significantly lower BMI than those with BPAN (p<0.01), although both subgroups of AN were below the 17.5 BMI cut-off criteria for AN as currently specified by the DSM-IV. The mean age was 26 (6.8) in the AN group and 26 (9.5) in the HC group, with no significant difference between groups. Women with AN had significantly less years of formal education than the HC group (p<0.05), and scored significantly higher on the EDE-Q measure of restraint than the HC women (p<0.01). Women with BPAN scored significantly higher than the RAN on the EDE-Q restraint scale (p<0.01), perhaps a reflection of the desire to restrain rather than actual restraint. Women with AN reported a significantly lower mood before the scan than the HC women (p<0.01), however, women with BPAN reported a higher mood than both RAN and HC groups (p<0.001). As expected, women who were diagnosed with RAN reported no bingeing or purging behaviour, whereas the BPAN group did, which is consistent with the diagnostic criteria for the subtypes. Duration of illness was not significantly different between the subtypes of AN.

Subjective anxiety ratings prior to and during the scan

Women with BPAN reported significantly higher levels of anxiety prior to the scan (as measured by HADS) than the women with RAN (p<0.001), but were comparably depressed prior to the scan (as measured by HADS). As expected, women with AN were significantly more anxious and depressed than the HC group (p<0.001). With regard to the anxiety ratings during the scan, the subtypes of AN were comparably anxious when thinking about eating the food shown in the food images, and all women with AN were significantly more anxious than the HC group (p<0.001). Women with RAN were comparably anxious in response to the non-food images as the HC group; however, the women with BPAN were significantly more anxious to the non-food images than the RAN and HC groups (p<0.01).

fMRI data: Within-group maps
Food versus non-food images

These data are shown in Table 2, and data for healthy controls and the total AN group are reported in our previous publication [36]. In the subgroups of AN, we found that in the RAN group (n = 11), food images significantly increased activation in cerebellar vermis (x = −25, y = −66, z = −16), left visual cortex (x = −14, y = −83, z = −7), right DLPFC (x = 40, y = 5, z = 24), and in the medial prefrontal cortex (x = 0, y = 42, z = 40). In the BPAN group (n = 7), food images significantly increased activation in the left cerebellar vermis (x = −4, y = −56, z = −27), right cerebellar vermis (x = 25, y = −62, z = −14) and right inferior temporal gyrus (x = 22, y = −6, z = −44).

fMRI data: Between-group maps
Activation to food images compared to non-food images. Data are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, and Table 3

In comparison to the HC group, when thinking about eating food shown in the images, the AN group showed increased activation in the right visual cortex (x = 29, y = −67, z = 15), but relatively reduced activation in the right cerebellar vermis (x = 14, y = −33, z = −15) and left cerebellar vermis (x = −7, y = −44, z = −17).

In preliminary analyses, the RAN group compared to the HC group showed increased activation in the right visual cortex (x = 29, y = −75, z = 20) and right DLPFC (x = 40, y = 37, z = 15) and reduced activation in the left cerebellar vermis (x = −18, y = −41, z = −17) and right insular cortex (x = 43, y = −25, z = 1). Compared to the HC group, the BPAN group showed significantly increased activation in the right visual cortex (x = 18, y = −76, z = −2), but relatively reduced activation in the left cerebellar vermis (x = −6, y = −34, z = −23) and right insular cortex (x = 41, y = −21, z = 7). Finally, in the RAN group compared to the BPAN group, there was relatively increased activation in the right visual cortex (x = 22, y = −65, z = −3), left visual cortex (x = −11, y = −78, z = 17), left parahippocampal gyrus (x = −18, y = −32, z = 2) and left anterior cingulate cortex (x = −4, y = −18, z = 32), but reduced activation in the left visual cortex (x = −15, y = −62, z = −3).

Correlation Analysis with behavioral data and brain activation

In all groups, no global brain correlations survived Bonferroni corrections.

fMRI data: effects of SSRIs

In the AN group, 4/11 women with RAN and 6/7 women with BPAN, were taking SSRI medication (which might alter neural activation [21]. Independent t-tests were run to check for differences: no significant differences were found in any neural activation to food or aversive stimuli between women who were taking SSRI medication and those who were not. However, we are aware that all fMRI analyses presented in this paper are limited by power due to the small group numbers. Thus, although much support is gleaned by previous studies, caution must be exercised when interpreting the data presented here. Our intention is to provide preliminary exploratory data in order to generate a platform for future hypothesis testing.


Discussion

This fMRI study uniquely demonstrated how thinking about eating food presented in images activates differential neural responses between healthy women and those with a current diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN). Additionally, we conducted a preliminary analysis of the differential neural responses between the subtypes of AN who have varying levels of appetite restraint. This study progresses our recent fMRI findings that compared women with AN with those who had bulimia nervosa (BN) [47], by focusing only on the differential effects of thinking about eating food between healthy women and those with AN (and the subtypes). Our main finding was that in the total AN group, thinking about eating food corresponded to a reduced activation in the cerebellar vermis and increased activation in the visual cortex. FMRI studies of those with AN showing food stimuli also report reduced activation in the cerebellum [48] and this also accords with reports that the cerebellum, particularly the vermis, has a prominent role in feeding behaviour [10], [11], [12]. It is likely that asking females with AN to think about eating food does not activate appetitive regions of the brain in the same way as healthy females, and it is likely that there will be a reduced appetitive response in the brain, given that one of the core symptoms of this eating disorder is restraint of appetite.

Our strongest result in terms of cluster size, was observed in preliminary analyses comparing the subtypes of AN separately with healthy controls, yielding a reduced activation in the right insular cortex in AN. The insular cortex, particularly the anterior insular cortex (AIC) is associated with subjective feelings of the body, or interoceptive awareness and generally with all types of emotional feelings [49], and a recent fMRI study has also shown reduced AIC activation in response to rewarding stimuli in people with AN [36]. Activation of the insular cortex in response to food images in healthy controls might reflect an interoceptive awareness of appetitive responses. However, in women with AN, appetitive responses to food images are likely to be in conflict with the desire to be thin, and to activate anxiogenic concerns about shape, weight and eating. It has been suggested that disruption to insular cortex activation in those with AN might reflect a rate-limiting defect, that is, a failure to efficiently process information from appetitive brain regions and to effectively orchestrate with higher-order cognitions [2], [30], [31]. A rate-limiting defect in the insular cortex likely underlies a proneness for anxiety [24], which often precedes and is highly comorbid with eating disorders [17]. Thus, in females with AN, activation of brain regions involved in the Cognitive Control Network (CCN), such as the DLPFC and the ACC, may be associated with attempts to cognitively control and/or disrupt somatic responses [50] that is the basis of an anxiogenic interoceptive awareness of appetitive stimulation, via interaction with the insular cortex [2], [24], [30], [31], [51].

It is clear from the literature that using body image stimuli, as opposed to food images during fMRI activates different patterns of neural activation in those with AN. Recent studies showing images of bodies (e.g. own, others, drawn figures) report reduced activation in the superior temporal lobe, visual cortex, ACC and frontal regions, as well as increased insula and premotor cortex activation [52], [53], [54]. Therefore, it is likely that body image distortions arise from a different neural pattern to the neural mechanisms underlying restriction of appetite, given that we and others using food stimuli observe increased activation in frontal, ACC and visual regions, but reduced activation in the striatum, cerebellum, insular cortex e.g. [48], [55], [56], [57], although we failed to observe increased amygdala and ACC activation as in some studies e.g. [56], [58]. Furthermore, some fMRI studies demonstrate that hunger and satiety can alter the response to food stimuli in those with AN, for example, reduced visual cortex activation when hungry but greater visual and lateral prefrontal activation when satiated [57], which compares to our results and may demonstrate that females with AN were satiated after eating lunch.

Greater visual cortex activation in the women with AN may be associated with cognitive biases [59] linked with thoughts about consuming the food shown in the images and strategies to cognitively restrain appetite. There is some evidence that the visual cortex is modulated by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), via increased attention resources, and the combined activation of these regions are strongly linked to object recognition [60]. Given that we found, in comparison to healthy controls, increased DLPFC and visual cortex activation in just over half the group of AN participants who were sub-classified as restricting AN (and not when combining with, or separately analysing the binge-purging AN group), it seems a plausible preliminary conclusion to suggest that excessive appetite suppression and cognitive biases for food stimuli in those with RAN are linked to DLPFC function. It could be that combining the subtypes of AN during fMRI analysis prevents DLPFC activation from being observed, given their varying levels of control over appetite. This is a particularly attractive explanation in line with a recent review of fMRI studies in AN that reported a strong association between RAN and DLPFC function [34]. Furthermore, mounting evidence, in both healthy and disordered eating behaviour, implicates the DLPFC in the cognitive control of appetite [61], particularly in females [62], [63], and artificial stimulation of the DLPFC reduces the experience of craving for food in those who are prone to binge eat [64]. Finally, there is evidence for lateralization of DLPFC-driven cognitive control: the left DLPFC activating to anticipation of conflict, the right to immediate, impulsive conflict [65], and here we found increased right DLPFC activation in RAN, suggesting that thinking about eating while looking at pictures of food causes immediate conflict with desires to remain thin.

Preliminary findings when comparing restricting with binge purging AN also revealed greater activation of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the parahippocampal gyrus. The ACC lies caudal-medial to the DLPFC, and is associated with orchestrating top-down cognitive and bottom-up arousal (e.g. appetitive) responses, in line with current predictions about desired and likely future rewards [66], in order to make adjustments for effective cognitive control via interaction with the DLPFC [67]. It is plausible that there is more conflict between cognitive strategies and appetitive responses in those with RAN, given that they are perhaps ruminating on restraint cognitions to a greater degree than those who temporarily relinquish their cognitive control during sporadic binge eating, and that appetitive responses interfere with these cognitions. However, it could also be that predictions are computed via ACC activation in those with BPAN, reflecting a greater impingement of appetitive neural circuitry on cognitive restraint, as seen in some fMRI studies of those who are prone to binge eating [68]. Observing a greater parahippocampal response in RAN compared to BPAN might reflect that the former group are engaging in more ruminations about previous experiences of eating food, e.g. [69]. Conversely, it might be that a general lack of appetitive behaviour in those with RAN leads to a downregulation of parahippocampal gray matter volume, e.g [55], causing this region to be hyper-stimulated when explicitly thinking about eating food. However, in our current small preliminary samples of women with RAN and BPAN, it is difficult to ascertain the true nature of the relationship between appetitive processes and cognitive restraint, and so a comparison with larger subgroup groups of AN is needed.

According to a recent clinical review of neuroimaging studies in AN, summarising findings from fMRI and other methods (e.g. using Positron Emission Tomography, Single Photon Emission Tomography) [34], three main regions in those with restricting AN show the most consistent dysfunctional activation: the frontal cortex (particularly the DLPFC) [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], hypo-responsiveness in the left inferior parietal lobule [70], [75] and overall dysfunction in the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex [72], [73], [74], [76]. In those with binge purging AN there appears to be a similar pattern of neural dysfunction, in the frontal lobe [71], [74], [77], parietal cortex [71], [77] and bilateral anterior cingulate dysfunction [74], [78]. However, when examining neural dysfunction in AN as a whole group (without separately analysing the subtypes) a different neural profile emerges. Instead, it appears that core neural pathology in those with AN in general, includes reduced function/metabolism in the temporal lobe [47], [79], [80], [81] seemingly improving following recovery [82], [83], [84]. Moreover, in response to food stimuli, a left-dominant reduction in the temporal and parietal lobes is prevalent in people with AN [28], [29], [48], [85]. Increased activity in the fusiform gyrus and amygdala are also commonly observed [28], [82], [83], [84], [85]. Furthermore, dorsal striatum hypo-activation in AN regardless of subtype has also been reported by functional neuroimaging studies [71], [82], [83]. Thus, in conjunction with the main findings of previous neuroimaging studies, we find that thinking about eating food is associated with neural dysfunction in the visual cortex, DLPFC and ACC, and that a different neural signature is observed when separating the subtypes of AN, prompting the need for further research in to the subtypes.

In the present study, we used a symptom-provocation fMRI paradigm that has been used in investigations of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) [35], an anxiety disorder that is highly comorbid with AN [86] . In the previous study of those with OCD, participants were cognitively engaged when they were shown anxiogenic pictures related to their disorder. They reported being anxious and showed an increased medial and dorsal PFC activation. In comparison, during our scanning period, we found that cognitively engaging participants while presenting food images (by asking them to think about eating the food) induced significantly higher levels of anxiety in women with AN compared to healthy controls. In addition, the RAN group showed a prefrontal response to the food images. Using instructions to cognitively engage the participants is a methodological variation from other fMRI studies that merely present appetitive stimuli (images of food, drink, and taste in the mouth) for passive engagement (e.g. not explicitly instructing to cognitively engage) to women with AN [26], [28], [29], [48], [57]. It is of note that these previous studies did not observe an increased DLPFC response to the appetitive stimuli. Thus, activation of the DLPFC may reflect a specific recruitment of anxiety-related cognitions in women with AN in relation to food (e.g. concerns about shape, weight and eating, striving for thinness), that may drive an inhibition of the insular cortex and other brain regions linked to appetitive responses (e.g. the cerebellum) that arise when thinking about eating food shown in images.

There are some caveats to the explanations above, and some limitations in this study. We did not find amygdala or OFC activation to food images in women with AN as in other studies [28], [29], [48], [87], [88], [89]. However, the size of the amygdala, combined with the reduced power of the study due to small sample sizes, and the heterogeneity of the AN group as a whole may account for this. However, again these differences could be due to a greater cognitive component during this paradigm in comparison to other studies. It is a fact that our subgroup numbers are small. However, we emphasise the preliminary nature of this unique fMRI study utilising cognitive engagement in the images in line with our previously published fMRI data [36]. In an attempt to counteract some of the limitations of small group numbers we used stringent voxel- and cluster-wise False Discovery Rate (FDR) threshold correction. Additionally, some women with AN were taking SSRI medication, but independent t-tests showed no significant differences in neural activation between those who were and were not taking SSRI. Also, it must be considered that since the females with AN were currently ill, the neural activation we observe could be due to malnutrition effects, and future fMRI studies should add covariates for gray matter volume [3]. Furthermore, we only used high calorie food images, and did not compare neural and cognitive responses to low calorie images, nor were food preferences assessed, which could have caused differential activation. Also, we did not collect data to ensure that all healthy participants had, as instructed, eaten lunch, although all females with AN were collected from the hospital after eating lunch; nor did we collect data on IQ or duration of impatient care (although we did collect duration of illness data). Lastly, we did not explicitly test cognitive engagement with the images: however, increased visual cortex activation (in the food versus non-food individual group contrasts) suggests visual engagement in the images during the experiment.

The data from this novel preliminary study progresses the field and can provide the following tentative conclusions that need further testing. Women with AN have reduced appetitive and somatosensory neural responses to food images when explicitly thinking about eating food shown in images, but the subtypes are differentiated by increased DLPFC-ACC and reduced cerebellar vermis activation. These regions are associated with a cognitive control network (CCN), specifically controlling basic appetitive drives with cognitive restraint mechanisms. Conflict between appetitive responses to food and anxiety cognitions about shape, weight, eating and desire for thinness are likely to activate neural mechanisms associated with the DLPFC. An imbalanced convergence on the insular cortex by the CCN is likely to lead to a rate-limiting defect and disruption to appetitive neural responses and difficulties in interoceptive awareness in females with AN. Activation of the CCN is perhaps more prominent in women with RAN.


Supporting Information Table S1

List of stimuli presented during the scan: lexical descriptions of neutral images and images of high calorie foods.

(DOCX)


Click here for additional data file (pone.0034000.s001.docx)


Notes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: Samantha Brooks was supported by the Nina Jackson Fellowship, Research Into Eating Disorders (RIED) and by the Psychiatry Research Trust (PRT), Institute of Psychiatry, UK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References
1. American Psychiatric Association AYear: 2002 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Version 4 Revised.
2. Kaye WH,Fudge JL,Paulus M. Year: 2009New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa.Nat Rev Neurosci1057358419603056
3. Kaye WH,Wagner A,Fudge JL,Paulus M. Year: 2011Neurocircuity of eating disorders.Curr Top Behav Neurosci6375721243469
4. Van den Eynde F,Treasure J. Year: 2009Neuroimaging in eating disorders and obesity: implications for research.Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am189511519014860
5. van Kuyck K GN,Van Laere K,Casteels C,Pieters G,Gabriels L,et al. Year: 2009Towards a neurocircuitry in anorexia nervosa: evidence from functional neuroimaging studies.J Psychiatr Res431133114519442986
6. Fassino S,Piero A,Gramaglia C,Daga GA,Gandione M,et al. Year: 2006Clinical, psychological, and personality correlates of asceticism in anorexia nervosa: from saint anorexia to pathologic perfectionism.Transcult Psychiatry4360061417166949
7. Friederich HC,Herzog W. Year: 2011Cognitive-behavioral flexibility in anorexia nervosa.Curr Top Behav Neurosci611112321243473
8. Fairburn C,Harrison PJ. Year: 2003Eating Disorders.Lancet36140741612573387
9. Carnell S,Gibson C,Benson L,Ochner CN,Geliebter A. Year: 2011Neuroimaging and obesity: current knowledge and future directions.Obes Rev
10. Zhu JN,Wang JJ. Year: 2008The cerebellum in feeding control: possible function and mechanism.Cell Mol Neurobiol2846947818027085
11. Scalera G. Year: 1991Effects of corticocerebellar lesions on taste preferences, body weight gain, food and fluid intake in the rat.J Physiol (Paris)852142221820455
12. Mahler P,Guastavino JM,Jacquart G,Strazielle C. Year: 1993An unexpected role of the cerebellum: involvement in nutritional organization.Physiol Behav54106310678295941
13. Everitt BJ,Belin D,Economidou D,Pelloux Y,Dalley JW,et al. Year: 2008Review. Neural mechanisms underlying the vulnerability to develop compulsive drug-seeking habits and addiction.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci3633125313518640910
14. Grahn JA,Parkinson JA,Owen AM. Year: 2008The cognitive functions of the caudate nucleus.Prog Neurobiol8614115518824075
15. Berridge KC,Ho CY,Richard JM,DiFeliceantonio AG. Year: 2010The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders.Brain Res1350436420388498
16. Swinbourne JM,Touyz SW. Year: 2007The co-morbidity of eating disorders and anxiety disorders: a review.Eur Eat Disord Rev1525327417676696
17. Pallister E,Waller G. Year: 2008Anxiety in the eating disorders: understanding the overlap.Clin Psychol Rev2836638617707562
18. Bruch H. Year: 1962Perceptual and conceptual disturbances in anorexia nervosa.Psychosom Med2418719413873828
19. Oldershaw A,Hambrook D,Tchanturia K,Treasure J,Schmidt U. Year: 2010Emotional theory of mind and emotional awareness in recovered anorexia nervosa patients.Psychosom Med72737919995886
20. Hambrook D,Oldershaw A,Rimes K,Schmidt U,Tchanturia K,et al. Year: 2010Emotional expression, self-silencing, and distress tolerance in anorexia nervosa and chronic fatigue syndrome.Br J Clin Psychol
21. Linden DE. Year: 2006How psychotherapy changes the brain–the contribution of functional neuroimaging.Mol Psychiatry1152853816520823
22. Craig AD. Year: 2009How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness.Nat Rev Neurosci10597019096369
23. Kent JM,Rauch SL. Year: 2003Neurocircuitry of anxiety disorders.Curr Psychiatry Rep526627312857529
24. Paulus MP,Stein MB. Year: 2006An insular view of anxiety.Biol Psychiatry6038338716780813
25. Sehlmeyer C,Schoning S,Zwitserlood P,Pfleiderer B,Kircher T,et al. Year: 2009Human fear conditioning and extinction in neuroimaging: a systematic review.PLoS One4e586519517024
26. Wagner A,Aizenstein H,Mazurkewicz L,Fudge J,Frank GK,et al. Year: 2008Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa.Neuropsychopharmacology3351352317487228
27. Wagner A,Aizenstein H,Venkatraman VK,Fudge J,May JC,et al. Year: 2007Altered reward processing in women recovered from anorexia nervosa.Am J Psychiatry1641842184918056239
28. Ellison Z,Foong J,Howard R,Bullmore E,Williams S,et al. Year: 1998Functional anatomy of calorie fear in anorexia nervosa.Lancet35211929777839
29. Uher R,Brammer MJ,Murphy T,Campbell IC,Ng VW,et al. Year: 2003Recovery and chronicity in anorexia nervosa: brain activity associated with differential outcomes.Biol Psychiatry5493494214573322
30. Nunn K,Frampton I,Fuglset TS,Torzsok-Sonnevend M,Lask B. Year: 2011Anorexia nervosa and the insula.Med Hypotheses7635335721087828
31. Nunn K,Frampton I,Gordon I,Lask B. Year: 2008The fault is not in her parents but in her insula–a neurobiological hypothesis of anorexia nervosa.Eur Eat Disord Rev1635536018711713
32. Cowdrey FA,Park RJ,Harmer CJ,McCabe C. Year: 2011Increased neural processing of rewarding and aversive food stimuli in recovered anorexia nervosa.Biol Psychiatry7073674321714958
33. Jacobi C,Hayward C,de Zwaan M,Kraemer HC,Agras WS. Year: 2004Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy.Psychol Bull130196514717649
34. Pietrini F,Castellini G,Ricca V,Polito C,Pupi A,et al. Year: 2011Functional neuroimaging in anorexia nervosa: a clinical approach.Eur Psychiatry2617618220934859
35. Mataix-Cols D,Wooderson S,Lawrence N,Brammer MJ,Speckens A,et al. Year: 2004Distinct neural correlates of washing, checking, and hoarding symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Arch Gen Psychiatry6156457615184236
36. Brooks S,O'Daly OG,Uher R,Friederich HC,Giampietro V,et al. Year: 2011Differential neural responses to food images in women with bulimia versus anorexia nervosa.PLoS One Epub ahead of print.
37. First M,Gibbon M,Spitzer RL,Williams J. Year: 2001 User's guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis for DSM-IVTR axis I disorders: Research version. New York.
38. Fairburn CG,Beglin SJ. Year: 1994Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?Int J Eat Disord163633707866415
39. Zigmond AS,Snaith RP. Year: 1983The hospital anxiety and depression scale.Acta Psychiatr Scand673613706880820
40. Brammer MJ. Year: 1998Multidimensional wavelet analysis of functional magnetic resonance images.Hum Brain Mapp63783829788076
41. Brammer M. Year: 2003Statistical analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data: current state and recent developments.Stat Methods Med Res1237337414599001
42. Bullmore E,Fadili J,Breakspear M,Salvador R,Suckling J,et al. Year: 2003Wavelets and statistical analysis of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain.Stat Methods Med Res1237539914599002
43. Ashburner J,Friston KJ. Year: 2005Unified segmentation.Neuroimage2683985115955494
44. Thirion B,Pinel P,Tucholka A,Roche A,Ciuciu P,et al. Year: 2007Structural analysis of fMRI data revisited: improving the sensitivity and reliability of fMRI group studies.IEEE Trans Med Imaging261256126917896597
45. Fusar-Poli P,Bhattacharyya S,Allen P,Crippa JA,Borgwardt S,et al. Year: 2010Effect of image analysis software on neurofunctional activation during processing of emotional human faces.J Clin Neurosci1731131420079652
46. Desmond JE,Glover GH. Year: 2002Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analyses.J Neurosci Methods11811512812204303
47. Brooks SJ,O'Daly OG,Uher R,Friederich HC,Giampietro V,et al. Year: 2011Differential neural responses to food images in women with bulimia versus anorexia nervosa.PLoS One6e2225921799807
48. Uher R,Murphy T,Brammer MJ,Dalgleish T,Phillips ML,et al. Year: 2004Medial prefrontal cortex activity associated with symptom provocation in eating disorders.Am J Psychiatry1611238124615229057
49. Craig AD. Year: 2011Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body.Ann N Y Acad Sci1225728221534994
50. Tops M,Boksem MA. Year: 2011A potential role of the inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula in cognitive control, brain rhythms, and event-related potentials.Front Psychol233022084637
51. Bruch H. Year: 1962Perceptual and conceptual disturbances in anorexia nervosa.Psychosom Med2418719413873828
52. Vocks S,Schulte D,Busch M,Gronemeyer D,Herpertz S,et al. Year: 2011Changes in neuronal correlates of body image processing by means of cognitive-behavioural body image therapy for eating disorders: a randomized controlled fMRI study.Psychol Med411651166321205361
53. Vocks S,Busch M,Schulte D,Gronermeyer D,Herpertz S,et al. Year: 2010Effects of body image therapy on the activation of the extrastriate body area in anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study.Psychiatry Res18311411820630712
54. Friederich HC,Brooks S,Uher R,Campbell IC,Giampietro V,et al. Year: 2010Neural correlates of body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa.Neuropsychologia482878288520553738
55. Brooks SJ,Barker GJ,O'Daly OG,Brammer M,Williams SC,et al. Year: 2011Restraint of appetite and reduced regional brain volumes in anorexia nervosa: a voxel-based morphometric study.BMC Psychiatry1117922093442
56. Gizewski ER,Rosenberger C,de Greiff A,Moll A,Senf W,et al. Year: 2010Influence of satiety and subjective valence rating on cerebral activation patterns in response to visual stimulation with high-calorie stimuli among restrictive anorectic and control women.Neuropsychobiology6218219220664231
57. Santel S,Baving L,Krauel K,Munte TF,Rotte M. Year: 2006Hunger and satiety in anorexia nervosa: fMRI during cognitive processing of food pictures.Brain Res111413814816919246
58. Joos AA,Saum B,van Elst LT,Perlov E,Glauche V,et al. Year: 2011Amygdala hyperreactivity in restrictive anorexia nervosa.Psychiatry Res19118919521316204
59. Brooks S,Prince A,Stahl D,Campbell IC,Treasure J. Year: 2011A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive bias to food stimuli in people with disordered eating behaviour.Clin Psychol Rev31375121130935
60. Sinnett S,Snyder JJ,Kingstone A. Year: 2009Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in visual object-based selective attention.Exp Brain Res19419119619139861
61. Hollmann M,Hellrung L,Pleger B,Schlogl H,Kabisch S,et al. Year: 2011Neural correlates of the volitional regulation of the desire for food.Int J Obes (Lond)
62. Cornier MA,Salzberg AK,Endly DC,Bessesen DH,Tregellas JR. Year: 2010Sex-based differences in the behavioral and neuronal responses to food.Physiol Behav9953854320096712
63. Burger KS,Stice E. Year: 2011Relation of dietary restraint scores to activation of reward-related brain regions in response to food intake, anticipated intake, and food pictures.Neuroimage5523323921147234
64. Van den Eynde F,Claudino AM,Mogg A,Horrell L,Stahl D,et al. Year: 2010Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces cue-induced food craving in bulimic disorders.Biol Psychiatry6779379520060105
65. Vanderhasselt MA,De Raedt R,Baeken C. Year: 2009Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Stroop performance: tackling the lateralization.Psychon Bull Rev1660961219451392
66. Wallis JD,Kennerley SW. Year: 2011Contrasting reward signals in the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.Ann N Y Acad Sci1239334222145873
67. Kerns JG,Cohen JD,MacDonald AW 3rd,Cho RY,Stenger VA,et al. Year: 2004Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.Science3031023102614963333
68. Gearhardt AN,Yokum S,Orr PT,Stice E,Corbin WR,et al. Year: 2011Neural correlates of food addiction.Arch Gen Psychiatry6880881621464344
69. Higgs S. Year: 2008Cognitive influences on food intake: the effects of manipulating memory for recent eating.Physiol Behav9473473918486159
70. Beato-Fernandez L,Rodriguez-Cano T,Garcia-Vilches I,Garcia-Vicente A,Poblete-Garcia V,et al. Year: 2009Changes in regional cerebral blood flow after body image exposure in eating disorders.Psychiatry Res17112913719168335
71. Delvenne V,Lotstra F,Goldman S,Biver F,De Maertelaer V,et al. Year: 1995Brain hypometabolism of glucose in anorexia nervosa: a PET scan study.Biol Psychiatry371611697727624
72. Kojima S,Nagai N,Nakabeppu Y,Muranaga T,Deguchi D,et al. Year: 2005Comparison of regional cerebral blood flow in patients with anorexia nervosa before and after weight gain.Psychiatry Res14025125816288853
73. Naruo T,Nakabeppu Y,Deguchi D,Nagai N,Tsutsui J,et al. Year: 2001Decreases in blood perfusion of the anterior cingulate gyri in Anorexia Nervosa Restricters assessed by SPECT image analysis.BMC Psychiatry1211407997
74. Takano A,Shiga T,Kitagawa N,Koyama T,Katoh C,et al. Year: 2001Abnormal neuronal network in anorexia nervosa studied with I-123-IMP SPECT.Psychiatry Res107455011472863
75. Wagner A,Ruf M,Braus DF,Schmidt MH. Year: 2003Neuronal activity changes and body image distortion in anorexia nervosa.Neuroreport142193219714625446
76. Yonezawa LA,Kitamura SS,Mirandola RM,Antonelli AC,Ortolani EL. Year: 2005Preventive treatment with vitamin E alleviates the poisoning effects of carbon tetrachloride in cattle.J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med5229229716050911
77. Kuruoglu AC,Kapucu O,Atasever T,Arikan Z,Isik E,et al. Year: 1998Technetium-99m-HMPAO brain SPECT in anorexia nervosa.J Nucl Med393043069476941
78. Yonezawa H,Otagaki Y,Miyake Y,Okamoto Y,Yamawaki S. Year: 2008No differences are seen in the regional cerebral blood flow in the restricting type of anorexia nervosa compared with the binge eating/purging type.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci62263318289138
79. Lask B,Gordon I,Christie D,Frampton I,Chowdhury U,et al. Year: 2005Functional neuroimaging in early-onset anorexia nervosa.Int J Eat Disord37SupplS4951; discussion S87–4915852320
80. Chowdhury U,Gordon I,Lask B,Watkins B,Watt H,et al. Year: 2003Early-onset anorexia nervosa: is there evidence of limbic system imbalance?Int J Eat Disord3338839612658668
81. Gordon I,Lask B,Bryant-Waugh R,Christie D,Timimi S. Year: 1997Childhood-onset anorexia nervosa: towards identifying a biological substrate.Int J Eat Disord221591659261654
82. Delvenne V,Goldman S,De Maertelaer V,Simon Y,Luxen A,et al. Year: 1996Brain hypometabolism of glucose in anorexia nervosa: normalization after weight gain.Biol Psychiatry407617688894069
83. Herholz K,Krieg JC,Emrich HM,Pawlik G,Beil C,et al. Year: 1987Regional cerebral glucose metabolism in anorexia nervosa measured by positron emission tomography.Biol Psychiatry2243513491631
84. Krieg JC,Lauer C,Leinsinger G,Pahl J,Schreiber W,et al. Year: 1989Brain morphology and regional cerebral blood flow in anorexia nervosa.Biol Psychiatry25104110482785821
85. Gordon CM,Dougherty DD,Fischman AJ,Emans SJ,Grace E,et al. Year: 2001Neural substrates of anorexia nervosa: a behavioral challenge study with positron emission tomography.J Pediatr139515711445794
86. Hildebrandt T,Bacow T,Markella M,Loeb KL. Year: 2010Anxiety in anorexia nervosa and its management using family-based treatment.Eur Eat Disord Rev
87. Killgore WD,Yurgelun-Todd DA. Year: 2005Body mass predicts orbitofrontal activity during visual presentations of high-calorie foods.Neuroreport1685986315891585
88. Siep N,Roefs A,Roebroeck A,Havermans R,Bonte ML,et al. Year: 2009Hunger is the best spice: an fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex.Behav Brain Res19814915819028527
89. Goldstone AP,Prechtl de Hernandez CG,Beaver JD,Muhammed K,Croese C,et al. Year: 2009Fasting biases brain reward systems towards high-calorie foods.Eur J Neurosci301625163519811532

Figures

[Figure ID: pone-0034000-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034000.g001.
Figure 1  Between-group map activation comparing the food>non-food activation in women with anorexia nervosa versus healthy controls; restricting anorexia versus healthy controls; binge-purging anorexia nervosa versus healthy controls.

T-value bar illustrates t-value scores represented by cluster on the brain map. Greater activation in: (A) women with anorexia nervosa (AN) compared to healthy controls (HC) in the right visual cortex; (B) healthy controls (HC) compared to AN in the bilateral cerebellum; (C) women with restricting anorexia nervosa (RAN) compared to HC in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and right visual cortex; (D) HC compared to RAN in the right cerebellum and right insular cortex; (E) women with binge-purge anorexia nervosa (BPAN) compared to HC in the right visual cortex; (F) HC compared to BPAN in the left cerebellum and right insular cortex.



[Figure ID: pone-0034000-g002]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034000.g002.
Figure 2  Between-group map activation comparing the food>non-food activation in women with restricting anorexia nervosa versus women with binge-purging anorexia nervosa.

T-bar illustrates t-value scores represented by cluster on the brain map. Greater activation in: (A) women with binge-purge anorexia nervosa (BPAN) compared to women with restricting anorexia nervosa (RAN) in the left cerebellum; (B) women with restricting anorexia nervosa (RAN) compared to BPAN in the bilateral visual cortex, parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).



Tables
[TableWrap ID: pone-0034000-t001] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034000.t001.
Table 1  Demographic characteristics and self-report measures: demonstrating the mean values, standard deviations, and differences in scores between women with anorexia nervosa, women with restricting anorexia nervosa, women with binge-purging anorexia nervosa and healthy control women.
Means, S.D. Contrast Effect Sizes (cohen's d)
AN(n = 18) RAN(n = 11) BPAN(n = 7) HC(n = 24) ANvHC RANvHC BPANvHC RANvBPAN
Age, years 26(6.8) 26(7.2) 25(6.6) 26(9.5) 0 0.02 0.07 0.06
BMI, kg/m2 15.7(1.2) 15.2(1.2) 16.4(0.6) 21.7(2.4) 3.1 2.93 2.66 1.22
Education, years 8(3) 8(4) 8(3) 12(6.5) 0.76 0.7 0.76 0.14
Duration of ED, years 7.2(4.0) 9(7.4) 9(6.1) - - - - 0.01
SSRI medication (No., %) 10(55.5) 4(36) 6(86) - - - - 0.04
EDE-Q (0–6)
- restrained eating 2.6(1.7) 2.1(1.6) 5.5(1.8) 0.8(1.0) 1.81 1.1 1.2 0.92
EDE-Q No. of binges in a month:(Q8, 0–6) 0.9(1.78) - 2(3) - - - - -
EDE-Q No. of vomits in a month: (Q22) 2.8 (7.28) - 7(10) - - - - -
HADS- Anxiety (0–21) 13.6(3.6) 12(9) 17(3) 4.4(2.7) 4.19 2.7 2.8 1.14
HADS- Depression (0–21) 13.6(3.7) 8(5) 12(9) 1.6(1.7) 4.5 2.9 2.7 0.88
Psychiatric co-morbidity (No., %) 14(77.7) 8(78) 6(71) - - - - 0.04
- Depressive disorders (No., %) 3(16.6) 2(18) 1(14) - - - - 0.06
- Anxiety disorders (No., %) 6(33.3) 8(27) 2(29) - - - - 0.04
- Depression & Anxiety (No., %) 5(27.7) 8(27) 2(29) - - - - 0.04
Mood (0–10) 4.2(2.2) 4.47(2.3) 8.91(2.2) 6.4(1.7) 0.28 1.05 1.43 2.08
Food anxiety (0–10) 6.9(1.8) 6.98(2.1) 7.66(2.0) 2.4(2.0) 0.24 2.32 2.72 0.35
Non-food anxiety (0–10) 1.8(0.9) 1.44(0.78) 2.68(0.48) 1.8(1.7) 0.86 0.25 0.59 1.93

Values expressed as mean, standard deviations in parentheses (S.D.); ABBREVIATIONS: AN = Anorexia Nervosa; RAN = Restricting Anorexia Nervosa; BPAN = Binge Purge Anorexia Nervosa; HC = Healthy Control; BMI = Body Mass Index; ED = Eating Disorder; anx = anxiety measured during the scan as a self-report verbal response where 0 = least anxious and 10 = most anxious; SSRI = Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor; EDE-Q = Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, 0–6 scale for subscale scores where 0 is least severe, 6 is most severe, EDE-Q (Q8) number of binges in one month, scale 0 = no days, 1 = 1–5 days, 2 = 6–12 days, 3 = 13–15 days, 4 = 16–22 days, 5 = 23–27 days, 6 = everyday, EDE-Q (Q22) number of vomits in month = absolute number of vomits in one month, HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 0–21 scale where 0 is least severe and 21 is most severe for trait anxiety and depression as subscales; effect sizes for the contrasts are calculated using Cohen's d.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0034000-t002] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034000.t002.
Table 2  Within-group brain activation to food versus non-food images in women with restricting anorexia nervosa and women with binge-purging anorexia nervosa.
Brain regions BA Laterality x y z Cluster Size (voxels) Cluster P
Food>Non-Food
RAN (n = 11)
Cerebellar Vermis L −25 −66 −16 41 0.001
Visual Cortex 18 L −14 −83 −7 50 0.001
DLPFC 9 R 40 5 24 66 0.002
Medial PFC 8 0 42 40 179 0.0006
BPAN (n = 7)
Cerebellar Vermis L −4 −56 −27 111 0.0008
Cerebellar Vermis R 25 −62 −14 389 0.0002
Inferior Temporal Gyrus 20 R 22 −6 −44 124 0.0009

Talairach Coordinates = x, Saggital plane, y, Coronal plane, z, Axial plane; Cluster size in voxels, each voxel equals 3.75 mm×3.75 mm×3 mm; Cluster p = cluster probability corrected at the level of one false positive or less. ABBREVIATIONS: BA = Brodmann's Area; Laterality = L, Left, R, Right; p = probability; AN = Anorexia Nervosa, RAN = Restricting Anorexia Nervosa, BPAN = Binge Purge Anorexia Nervosa, HC = Healthy Controls; DLPFC = Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, SMA = Supplementary Motor Area. Note. Healthy control and total AN group data published in Brooks et al., (2011), PLoS One.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0034000-t003] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034000.t003.
Table 3  Between group contrast activation to food images in women with anorexia nervosa, women with restricting anorexia nervosa, women with binge-purging anorexia nervosa and healthy control women.
Brain Regions BA Laterality x y z Cluster size (voxels) Cluster-p
Food>Non-Food
AN>HC
Visual Cortex 18 R 29 −67 15 22 0.0009
HC>AN
Cerebellar Vermis R 14 −33 −15 22 0.0005
Cerebellar Vermis L −7 −44 −17 30 0.00007
RAN>HC
Visual Cortex 19 R 29 −75 20 23 0.002
DLPFC 46 R 40 37 15 29 0.007
HC>RAN
Cerebellar Vermis L 18 −41 −17 123 0.0003
Insular Cortex 13 R 43 −25 1 149 0.0003
BPAN>HC
Visual Cortex 18 R 18 −76 −2 18 0.0007
HC>BPAN
Cerebellar Vermis L −6 −34 −23 123 0.0003
Insular Cortex 13 R 41 −21 7 149 0.0003
RAN>BPAN
Visual Cortex 19 R 22 −65 −3 29 0.005
Visual Cortex 18 L −11 −78 17 71 0.0007
PHG 27 L −18 −32 2 28 0.009
ACC 23 L −4 −18 32 24 0.005
BPAN>RAN
Visual Cortex 19 L −15 −62 −3 10 0.006
Food>Non-Food
AN>HC

Talairach Coordinates = x, Saggital plane, y, Coronal plane, z, Axial plane; Cluster size in voxels, each voxel equals 3.75 mm×3.75 mm×3 mm; Cluster p = cluster probability corrected at the level of one false positive or less. ABBREVIATIONS: BA = Brodmann's Area; Laterality = L, Left, R, Right; p = probability; AN = Anorexia Nervosa, RAN = Restricting Anorexia Nervosa, BPAN = Binge Purge Anorexia Nervosa, HC = Healthy Controls; DLPFC = Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex; PHG = Parahippocampal Gyrus; ACC = Anterior Cingulate Cortex.



Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biology
    • Neuroscience
      • Cognitive Neuroscience
      • Neuroimaging
Article Categories:
  • Medicine
    • Mental Health
      • Psychiatry


Previous Document:  Use of arthropod rarity for area prioritisation: insights from the Azorean Islands.
Next Document:  Women born preterm or with inappropriate weight for gestational age are at risk of subsequent gestat...