Document Detail


Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: incidence, morbidities and outcomes in surgical ICU patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  7650252     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and severe sepsis in surgical ICU patients and define patient characteristics associated with their acquisition and outcome. DESIGN: One-month prospective study of critically ill patients with a 28 day in-hospital follow up. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at a tertiary care institution. METHODS: All patients (n = 170) admitted to the SICU between April 1 and April 30, 1992 were prospectively followed for 28 days. Daily surveillance was performed by two dedicated, specifically-trained research nurses. Medical and nursing chart reviews were performed, and follow up information at six and twelve months was obtained. RESULTS: The in-hospital surveillance represented 2246 patient-days, including 658 ICU patient-days. Overall, 158 patients (93%) had SIRS for an incidence of 542 episodes/1000 patients-days. The incidence of SIRS in the ICU was even higher (840 episodes/1000 patients-days). A total of 83 patients (49%) had sepsis; among them 28 developed severe sepsis. Importantly, 13 patients had severe sepsis after discharge from the ICU. Patient groups were comparable with respect to age, sex ratio, and type of surgery performed. Apache II score on admission to the ICU and ASA score at time of surgery were significantly higher (p < 0.05) only for patients who subsequently developed severe sepsis. The crude mortality at 28 days was 8.2% (14/170); it markedly differed among patient groups: 6% for those with SIRS vs. 35% for patients with severe sepsis. Patients with sepsis and severe sepsis had a longer mean length of ICU stay (2.1 +/- 0.2 and 7.5 +/- 1.5, respectively) than those with SIRS (1.45 +/- 0.1) or control patients (1.16 +/- 0.1). Total length of hospital stay also markedly differed among groups (35 +/- 9 (severe sepsis), 24 +/- 2 (sepsis), 11 +/- 0.8 (SIRS), and 9 +/- 0.1 (controls, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Almost everyone in the SICU had SIRS. Therefore, because of its poor specificity, SIRS was not helpful predicting severe sepsis and septic shock. Patients who developed sepsis or severe sepsis had higher crude mortality and length of stay than those who did not. Studies designed to identify those who develop complications of SIRS would be very useful.
Authors:
D Pittet; S Rangel-Frausto; N Li; D Tarara; M Costigan; L Rempe; P Jebson; R P Wenzel
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Intensive care medicine     Volume:  21     ISSN:  0342-4642     ISO Abbreviation:  Intensive Care Med     Publication Date:  1995 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1995-09-26     Completed Date:  1995-09-26     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7704851     Medline TA:  Intensive Care Med     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  302-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of General Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Female
Humans
Incidence
Intensive Care / statistics & numerical data*
Iowa / epidemiology
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
Prospective Studies
Sepsis / classification,  epidemiology*
Shock, Septic / epidemiology
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / epidemiology
Terminology as Topic
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jun;22(6):616-7   [PMID:  8814490 ]
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Apr;21(4):299-301   [PMID:  7650251 ]
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jun;22(6):615-6   [PMID:  8814489 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Coexistence of subepidermal calcified nodule and keratosis punctata in a patient with hyperhidrosis.
Next Document:  Different ventilatory approaches to keep the lung open.