Document Detail


Survival and quality of life after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older justify intervention.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16434205     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Controversy still exists about averting expenditure of health care resources on the growing elderly population. This study evaluates clinical outcome of patients aged 75 years and older operated upon for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between January 1990 and April 2004, of 247 patients undergoing emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection at our Institution, 40 patients (16%) were aged 75 years and older (mean 78+/-3 years, range 75-88 years) and represent the study population. On admission, 9 (22.5%) had cardiogenic shock/hypotension, 20 (50%) cardiac tamponade, 14 (35%) kidney failure, 11 (27.5%) limb ischemia, 3 (7.5%) neurologic deficit, and 1 (2.5%) myocardial ischemia. Surgical procedures included isolated replacement of the ascending aorta in 34 patients (85%), associated with total root replacement in 5 (12.5%), and with aortic valve replacement in 1 (2.5%). Eleven patients (27.5%) underwent aortic arch replacement (hemiarch: n=8, 20%; total arch: n=3, 7.5%). RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 30% (12 patients). Mortality tended to be higher (8/21, 38% vs 4/19, 21%; p=NS) for patients presenting with any one of the following complications: tamponade, shock, brain and/or myocardial, renal, limb malperfusion. Actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 7 years was 93+/-5%, 80+/-8%, and 80+/-8%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation 97+/-2%, 97+/-2%, and 97+/-2%, respectively. Actuarial event-free rates were 94+/-3%, 90+/-5%, and 90+/-5%. Seventy-four percent of survivors are in NYHA FC I, and quality of life test (RAND SF-36) revealed a generalized perception of independency and well-being, comparable to an age-matched population. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results for emergency repair of acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly justify intervention, particularly in uncomplicated cases. Expeditious referral and intervention by lowering pre-operative dissection-related complications and comorbidities might help to improve results. Survivors show functional status and quality of life similar to contemporary individuals.
Authors:
Francesco Santini; Giuseppe Montalbano; Antonio Messina; Augusto D'Onofrio; Gianluca Casali; Francesca Viscardi; Giovanni Battista Luciani; Alessandro Mazzucco
Related Documents :
708245 - Congenital aortic stenosis: ten to 22 years after valvulotomy.
11533605 - Aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta after stent-graft repair of acute aortic dissection.
19463595 - Long-term results of aortic root replacement: 15 years' experience.
17670005 - Impact of ascending aorta replacement combined with a ross procedure on autograft root ...
21063515 - The comparison between the efficacy of high dose acyclovir and erythromycin on the peri...
708245 - Congenital aortic stenosis: ten to 22 years after valvulotomy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article     Date:  2006-01-24
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery     Volume:  29     ISSN:  1010-7940     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg     Publication Date:  2006 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-02-13     Completed Date:  2006-04-13     Revised Date:  2006-08-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8804069     Medline TA:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  386-91     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, OCM Borgo Trento, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy. fsant@yahoo.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Acute Disease
Age Distribution
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aneurysm, Dissecting / rehabilitation,  surgery*
Aortic Aneurysm / rehabilitation,  surgery*
Emergencies
Epidemiologic Methods
Female
Humans
Male
Quality of Life*
Treatment Outcome
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jul;30(1):199; author reply 199-200   [PMID:  16730185 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Comparison of surgical results after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung canc...
Next Document:  The effect of skin surface warming during anesthesia preparation on preventing redistribution hypoth...