Document Detail

Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23027072     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of reports evaluating the outcomes of robotic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical stress response and costs of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) with those of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG).
METHODS: This prospective study compared a cohort of patients who had RADG with a cohort that underwent conventional LADG for early gastric cancer between March 2010 and May 2011. The surgical outcomes including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and complications, surgical stress response and overall costs were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the RADG group and 120 in the LADG group. There were no conversions. Median duration of operation was longer in the RADG group (218 (interquartile range 200-254) versus 140 (118-175) min; P < 0·001). Postoperative abdominal drain production was less (P = 0·001) and postoperative performance status was worse (P < 0·001) in the RADG group. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on postoperative days 1 and 3, and interleukin (IL) 6 level on the third postoperative day, were lower in the LADG compared with the RADG group (CRP: P = 0·002 and P = 0·014 respectively; IL-6: P < 0·001). Costs for robotic surgery were much higher than for laparoscopic surgery (difference €3189).
CONCLUSION: RADG did not reduce surgical stress compared with LADG. The substantial RADG costs due to robotic system expenses may not be justified. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J Y Park; M J Jo; B-H Nam; Y Kim; B W Eom; H M Yoon; K W Ryu; Y-W Kim; J H Lee
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The British journal of surgery     Volume:  99     ISSN:  1365-2168     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Surg     Publication Date:  2012 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-02     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372553     Medline TA:  Br J Surg     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1554-61     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Gastric Cancer Branch, National Cancer Centre, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications.
Next Document:  Surgical strategies for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.