Document Detail


Surgical adverse outcome reporting as part of routine clinical care.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20430928     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands, health professionals have created a doctor-driven standardised system to report and analyse adverse outcomes (AO). The aim is to improve healthcare by learning from past experiences. The key elements of this system are (1) an unequivocal definition of an adverse outcome, (2) appropriate contextual information and (3) a three-dimensional hierarchical classification system.
OBJECTIVES: First, to assess whether routine doctor-driven AO reporting is feasible. Second, to investigate how doctors can learn from AO reporting and analysis to improve the quality of care.
METHODS: Feasibility was assessed by how well doctors reported AO in the surgical department of a Dutch university hospital over a period of 9 years. AO incidence was analysed per patient subgroup and over time, in a time-trend analysis of three equal 3-year periods. AO were analysed case by case and statistically, to learn lessons from past events.
RESULTS: In 19,907 surgical admissions, 9189 AOs were reported: one or more AO in 18.2% of admissions. On average, 55 lessons were learnt each year (in 4.3% of AO). More AO were reported in P3 than P1 (OR 1.39 (1.23-1.57)). Although minor AO increased, fatal AO decreased over time (OR 0.59 (0.45-0.77)).
CONCLUSIONS: Doctor-driven AO reporting is shown to be feasible. Lessons can be learnt from case-by-case analyses of individual AO, as well as by statistical analysis of AO groups and subgroups (illustrated by time-trend analysis), thus contributing to the improvement of the quality of care. Moreover, by standardising AO reporting, data can be compared across departments or hospitals, to generate (confidential) mirror information for professionals cooperating in a peer-review setting.
Authors:
J Kievit; M Krukerink; P J Marang-van de Mheen
Related Documents :
12713988 - The role of angiogenesis in vulvar cancer, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, and vulvar...
12014568 - Case ii: conflict recognition--the case of the misdirected faculty.
4063218 - Exposure to vinyl chloride and angiosarcoma of the liver: a report of the register of c...
16608028 - Relationship between bolus transit and les-relaxation studied with concurrent impedance...
9838728 - Topical eucalyptus oil poisoning.
19318898 - Evidenced-based case management practice, part 1: the systematic review.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-04-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  Quality & safety in health care     Volume:  19     ISSN:  1475-3901     ISO Abbreviation:  Qual Saf Health Care     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-03     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101136980     Medline TA:  Qual Saf Health Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e20     Citation Subset:  H    
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. j.kievit@lumc.nl
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: the association between health insurance st...
Next Document:  Assessment of patient safety culture in Saudi Arabian hospitals.