Document Detail


Surgical Management of Tumors Invading the Aorta and Major Arterial Structures.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21764548     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: This study investigates surgical management of tumors arising from or involving the aorta and major arterial structures. METHODS: A retrospective single institutional review was conducted of patients undergoing arterial resection for tumors involving the aorta or major arterial structures between January 1992 and May 2009 at a tertiary care center. Patients with tumors abutting arteries without necessitating resection and those involving only venous structures were excluded. Patients were analyzed in groups by vessel involvement: aorta, carotid, external/common iliac, internal iliac, superficial femoral, and miscellaneous. RESULTS: Sixty patients were identified and included for review. The iliac arteries were most often resected, and sarcomatous pathology was most common (37 patients, 62%). Twelve patients underwent aortic resection, with eight (67%) of these undergoing graft reconstruction, one (8%) graft patch, and two (17%) primary repair. None of the 17 patients undergoing internal iliac resection underwent reconstruction, whereas the majority of patients in all other groups underwent reconstruction. Thirty-day mortality (TDM) was 0% in all groups, except the aortic (2/12, 17% TDM), and internal iliac arteries (1/17, 6% TDM). Estimated blood loss varied widely and was not significantly different between vessel groups (p = 0.280). Overall, 44 of 60 (73%) patients had negative margins. Fourteen patients (23%) returned to the operating room, most for wound infection or dehiscence. Mean follow-up was 20.25 months (range: 0.5-122.0 months, SD: 23 months). Forty patients were followed up for more than 1 year. Thus, with an overall median follow-up of 12.25 months, overall survival was 60% with disease-free survival of 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of tumors involving the aorta and major arterial structures provides a reasonable option for treatment, but with significant perioperative morbidity. In selected patients, this aggressive intervention should be considered.
Authors:
Susanne G Carpenter; William M Stone; Thomas C Bower; Richard J Fowl; Samuel R Money
Related Documents :
14562568 - Off-pump coronary surgery: how do the anesthetic considerations differ?
21562348 - Efficacy-and-safety-nitinol-clip-based-vascular-closure-device-starclose®-closure-comm...
12086378 - Beating heart versus conventional reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery.
22240508 - Correlation of internal jugular vein/common carotid artery ratio to central venous pres...
23744688 - Analysis of morphologic and hemodynamic parameters for unruptured posterior communicati...
15918448 - Construction of a pulmonary artery pump for unifocalization and repair of pulmonary atr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-7-15
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of vascular surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1615-5947     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-7-18     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8703941     Medline TA:  Ann Vasc Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Recruiting Strategies for Potential 0+5 Vascular Residency Applicants.
Next Document:  Endovascular Management of Blunt Aortic Injury With an Associated Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery: ...