Document Detail

Supplemental intravenous crystalloids for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: quantitative review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22593126     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Hypovolaemia after overnight fasting is believed to exacerbate postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, data on the efficacy of supplemental i.v. crystalloids for PONV prophylaxis are conflicting. We performed a literature search using CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. We included prospective randomized controlled trials that reported PONV event rates in patients receiving supplemental i.v. crystalloids or a conservative fluid regimen after elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Studies were evaluated with regard to random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selective reporting. We identified 15 trials (n=787 crystalloids; n=783 conservative fluids). Compared with conservative fluids, i.v. crystalloids reduced the risk of early postoperative nausea (PON) (relative risk 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.89; P=0.003), late PON (0.41, 0.22-0.76; P=0.004), and overall PON (0.66, 0.46-0.95; P=0.02). I.V. crystalloids did not reduce the risk of early postoperative vomiting (POV) (0.66, 0.37-1.16; P=0.16) or late POV (0.52, 0.25-1.11; P=0.09), but did reduce overall POV (0.48, 0.29-0.79; P=0.004). I.V. crystalloids did not reduce the risk of early PONV (0.74, 0.49-1.12; P=0.16), but did reduce the risk of late PONV (0.27, 0.13-0.54; P<0.001) and overall PONV (0.59, 0.42-0.84; P=0.003). I.V. crystalloids reduced the need for antiemetic rescue treatment (0.56, 0.45-0.68; P<0.001). In summary, supplemental i.v. crystalloids were associated with a lower incidence of several PONV outcomes. However, a number of PONV outcomes failed to reach statistical significance, perhaps due to the lack of power. Thus, studies sufficiently powered for the less frequent outcomes (e.g. POV) are required.
C C Apfel; A Meyer; M Orhan-Sungur; L Jalota; R P Whelan; S Jukar-Rao
Related Documents :
18237866 - Comparison of oral prednisone and topical fluticasone in the treatment of eosinophilic ...
22570846 - A comparison of the clinical and radiographic results of press fit condylar rotating-pl...
21401786 - Identifying neurocognitive deficits in adolescents following concussion.
22433506 - Comparison of three fusion techniques in the treatment of the degenerative cervical spi...
22122836 - Postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life: a national comparison of s...
11382626 - Intraoperative mitomycin-c without conjunctival and tenon's capsule touch in primary tr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  British journal of anaesthesia     Volume:  108     ISSN:  1471-6771     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Anaesth     Publication Date:  2012 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-05-17     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372541     Medline TA:  Br J Anaesth     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  893-902     Citation Subset:  IM    
Perioperative Clinical Research Core, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California-San Francisco, UCSF Medical Center at Mt Zion, 1600 Divisadero, C-447, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Analysis of incidental focal hypermetabolic uptake in the breast as detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT: clin...
Next Document:  IgE-mediated allergy to local anaesthetics: separating fact from perception: a UK perspective.