Document Detail


Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23025366     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Objective: Food labels to support healthier choices are an important potential intervention for improving population health by reducing obesity and diet-related disease. This study examines the use of research evidence about traffic light nutrition labelling in submissions to the Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy conducted in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Content analysis of final submissions to the Review and a literature review of documents reporting research evidence about traffic light labelling. Results: Sixty-two submitters to the Review were categorised as 'supporters' of traffic light labelling and 29 as 'opponents'. Supporters focused on studies showing traffic light labels were better than other systems at helping consumers identify healthier food options. Opponents cited evidence that traffic light labels were no better than other systems in this respect and noted a lack of evidence that they led to changes in food consumption. A literature review demonstrated that, as a group, submitters had drawn attention to most of the relevant research evidence on traffic light labelling. Both supporters and opponents were, however, selective in their use of evidence. Conclusions: The weight of evidence suggested that traffic light labelling has strengths in helping consumers to identify healthier food options. Further research would be valuable in informing the development of an interpretive front-of-pack labelling system. Implications: The findings have significant implications for the development of front-of-pack nutrition labelling currently being considered in Australia and New Zealand.
Authors:
John White; Louise Signal
Related Documents :
10370266 - Coastal marine communities: trends and perspectives from human-exclusion experiments.
12089326 - Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy.
23994086 - Quantitative risk assessment of foods containing peanut advisory labeling.
2929856 - Human depredation by vampire bats (desmodus rotundus) following a hog cholera campaign.
10860526 - Patch time allocation and patch sampling by foraging great and blue tits.
12876406 - Pollen from different olive tree cultivars contains varying amounts of the major allerg...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Australian and New Zealand journal of public health     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1753-6405     ISO Abbreviation:  Aust N Z J Public Health     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-02     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9611095     Medline TA:  Aust N Z J Public Health     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  446-51     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2012 The Authors. ANZJPH © 2012 Public Health Association of Australia.
Affiliation:
Health Promotion and Policy Research Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Competing risk analysis of mortality from invasive cutaneous melanoma in New South Wales: a populati...
Next Document:  Empirical evidence suggests adverse climate events have not affected Australian women's health and w...