Document Detail


Student projects in medicine: a lesson in science and ethics.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19866379     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Regulation of biomedical research is the subject of considerable debate in the bioethics and health policy worlds. The ethics and governance of medical student projects is becoming an increasingly important topic in its own right, especially in the U.K., where there are periodic calls to change it. My main claim is that there seems to be no good reason for treating student projects differently from projects led by qualified and more experienced scientists and hence no good grounds for changing the current system of ethics review. I first suggest that the educational objectives cannot be met without laying down standards of good science, whatever they may be. Weak science is unnecessary for educational purposes, and it is, in any case, unlikely to produce good researchers in the future. Furthermore, it is curious to want to change the system of ethics review specifically for students when it is the science that is at stake, and when the science now falls largely outside the ethics remit. I further show that ethics review is nevertheless important since students carry a new potential conflict of interests that warrants independent oversight which supervisory support does not offer. This potential conflict may become more morally troublesome the greater the risks to the subjects of the research, and students may impose greater risks on their subjects (relative to professional researchers) by virtue of being inexperienced, whatever the nature of the project. Pragmatic concerns may finally be allayed by organizing the current system more efficiently at critical times of the university calendar.
Authors:
Sarah J L Edwards
Related Documents :
18630249 - Fieldwork and social science research ethics.
24092579 - Demystifying biobanks.
20663769 - Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical rese...
18211249 - Patient registries in cognitive neuroscience research: advantages, challenges, and prac...
11645699 - Morality in flux: medical ethics dilemmas in the people's republic of china.
15301189 - New malaise: bioethics and human rights in the global era.
20533589 - Wjg sets an example of internationalization for other chinese academic journals.
20381649 - Respiration in a changing environment.
16393009 - Spousal agreement regarding relationship aggression on the conflict tactics scale-2.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Accountability in research     Volume:  16     ISSN:  1545-5815     ISO Abbreviation:  Account Res     Publication Date:  2009 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-10-29     Completed Date:  2010-02-16     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9100813     Medline TA:  Account Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  285-306     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
University College London, London, England, UK. sarah.edwards@ucl.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Conflict of Interest
Education, Medical, Undergraduate / ethics*,  standards
Ethics, Research*
Human Experimentation / ethics*,  standards*
Humans

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Toll-like receptors in pregnancy disorders and placental dysfunction.
Next Document:  Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods fo...