Document Detail

Structured approach to the elicitation of expert beliefs for a Bayesian-designed clinical trial: a case study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23335494     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
To quantify uncertainty in a formal manner, statisticians play a vital role in identifying a prior distribution for a Bayesian-designed clinical trial. However, when expert beliefs are to be used to form the prior, the literature is sparse on how feasible and how reliable it is to elicit beliefs from experts. For late-stage clinical trials, high importance is placed on reliability; however, feasibility may be equally important in early-stage trials. This article describes a case study to assess how feasible it is to conduct an elicitation session in a structured manner and to form a probability distribution that would be used in a hypothetical early-stage trial. The case study revealed that by using a structured approach to planning, training and conduct, it is feasible to elicit expert beliefs and form a probability distribution in a timely manner. We argue that by further increasing the published accounts of elicitation of expert beliefs in drug development, there will be increased confidence in the feasibility of conducting elicitation sessions. Furthermore, this will lead to wider dissemination of the pertinent issues on how to quantify uncertainty to both practicing statisticians and others involved with designing trials in a Bayesian manner. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Nelson Kinnersley; Simon Day
Related Documents :
24459324 - Overview of the taxonomy of zooxanthellate scleractinia.
24904154 - Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment.
8498584 - Nonlinear heart model predicts range of heart rates for 2:1 swinging in pericardial eff...
23707234 - Metaproteomics of our microbiome - developing insight in function and activity in man a...
25480164 - True cadence and step accumulation are not equivalent: the effect of intermittent claud...
24091394 - Comparison of feature selection methods for cross-laboratory microarray analysis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-21
Journal Detail:
Title:  Pharmaceutical statistics     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1539-1612     ISO Abbreviation:  Pharm Stat     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101201192     Medline TA:  Pharm Stat     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Herts, AL7 1TW, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthope...
Next Document:  Dislocations in nanostructured two-phase Fe(30) Ni(20) Mn(20) Al(30).