Document Detail

Strong activation of bile acid-sensitive ion channel (BASIC) by ursodeoxycholic acid.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23064163     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Bile acid-sensitive ion channel (BASIC) is a member of the DEG/ENaC gene family of unknown function. Rat BASIC (rBASIC) is inactive at rest. We have recently shown that cholangiocytes, the epithelial cells lining the bile ducts, are the main site of BASIC expression in the liver and identified bile acids, in particular hyo- and chenodeoxycholic acid, as agonists of rBASIC. Moreover, it seems that extracellular divalent cations stabilize the resting state of rBASIC, because removal of extracellular divalent cations opens the channel. In this addendum, we demonstrate that removal of extracellular divalent cations potentiates the activation of rBASIC by bile acids, suggesting an allosteric mechanism. Furthermore, we show that rBASIC is strongly activated by the anticholestatic bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), suggesting that BASIC might mediate part of the therapeutic effects of UDCA.
Dominik Wiemuth; Hacer Sahin; Cathérine M T Lefèvre; Hermann Wasmuth; Stefan Gründer
Related Documents :
3703103 - Turnover of palmitic and arachidonic acids in the phospholipids from different brain ar...
712433 - Effects of riboflavin deficiency on the lipids of rat liver mitochondria and microsomes.
8609913 - Influence of spontaneous hypertension on n-3 delta-6-desaturase activity and fatty acid...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-10-12
Journal Detail:
Title:  Channels (Austin, Tex.)     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1933-6969     ISO Abbreviation:  Channels (Austin)     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-15     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101321614     Medline TA:  Channels (Austin)     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Physiology; RWTH University Aachen; Aachen, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Channels (Austin)
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Channels (Austin)
Journal ID (publisher-id): CHAN
ISSN: 1933-6950
ISSN: 1933-6969
Publisher: Landes Bioscience
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2013 Landes Bioscience
Print publication date: Day: 01 Month: 1 Year: 2013
pmc-release publication date: Day: 01 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Volume: 7 Issue: 1
First Page: 38 Last Page: 42
PubMed Id: 23064163
ID: 3589280
Publisher Id: 2012CHANNELS0068R
Publisher Item Identifier: 22406
DOI: 10.4161/chan.22406

Strong activation of bile acid-sensitive ion channel (BASIC) by ursodeoxycholic acid
Dominik Wiemuth1*
Hacer Sahin2
Cathérine M.T. Lefèvre1
Hermann E. Wasmuth2
Stefan Gründer1*
1Department of Physiology; RWTH Aachen University; Aachen, Germany
2Department of Medicine III; RWTH Aachen University; Aachen, Germany
*Correspondence to: Dominik Wiemuth, Email: and Stefan Gründer, Email:


Bile acid-sensitive ion channel (BASIC) is a member of the DEG/ENaC family of cation channels. Other mammalian members of this gene family are the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) and acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs). While the function of ENaC in epithelial Na+ reabsorption and Na+ homeostasis has been known for some time1 and the role of ASICs in neuronal transmission and sensation of painful acidosis has been revealed over the last years,2,3 the physiological role of BASIC has remained unknown. Cloned more than a decade ago from rat and mouse, it was originally named BLINaC, according to its predominant sites of expression, namely the brain, the liver and the intestinal tract.4 The human homolog was cloned shortly after BASIC and originally named INaC (intestine Na+ channel), because its expression was mainly restricted to the intestinal tract.5 While BASIC from mouse (mBASIC) is a constitutively open, Na+-selective channel, its ortholog from rat (rBASIC) is almost completely blocked by physiological concentrations of extracellular Ca2+. The residual rBASIC current is unselective but removal of extracellular Ca2+ opens rBASIC and renders the channel more selective for Na+ over K+.6

A hallmark of DEG/ENaC channels is the block by the diuretic amiloride. While mBASIC is inhibited by micromolar concentrations of amiloride, rBASIC is only partially inhibited by millimolar concentrations of the drug.6 Additional pharmacological tools to investigate the physiological function of BASIC were identified recently.7 The anti-protozoal diarylamidines, in particular diminazene and the related compound nafamostat, inhibit BASIC at micromolar concentrations. Because diarylamidines do not inhibit ENaC,8 they are well suited to distinguish between ENaC and BASIC currents in tissues and cells.

Since its cloning, it was hypothesized that BASIC might be a ligand-gated channel, like other members of the DEG/ENaC family, for example the Hydra Na+ channel (HyNaC) from the freshwater polyp Hydra magnapapillata and FaNaC, the FMRFamide-activated Na+ channel from snails, which have neuropeptides as ligands.9-11 The ligand-hypothesis gained further support when flufenamic acid (FFA) was identified as an artificial agonist of rBASIC.7 Micro- to millimolar concentrations of FFA rapidly activate the channel, inducing Na+-selective currents.

Recently we identified cholangiocytes, the epithelial cells lining the bile ducts, as the main site of BASIC protein expression in the liver.12 This in turn led to the identification of bile acids as agonists of rBASIC, confirming that rBASIC requires a ligand for activation. Based on the sensitivity of the channel for bile acids we changed the original name BLINaC4 to BASIC.12 Various bile acids naturally occurring in mouse, rat and pig bile, in particular hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), activate rBASIC when applied individually. When applied together, HDCA and CDCA activate rBASIC synergistically.12

Bile acids are required to emulsify dietary fat in order to facilitate efficient lipolysis. They are synthesized by hepatocytes and then transported via the bile ducts to the gallbladder, where they are stored and from which they are released into the small intestine when required. Rats lack a gallbladder; in these animals the bile is directly released from the major extrahepatic bile duct into the duodenum. Hundreds of different bile acids are known to date, the structure of their side chain, their stereochemistry and the number and position of their hydroxylgroups varies and determines their chemical properties. Furthermore the bile acid composition is highly variable between different species. In humans for example, the major bile acids are CDCA and cholic acid (CA) whereas in rodents, CA, β-muricholic acid (β-MCA) and HDCA are the major bile acids.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the major physiological constituent of bear bile but it is also present in trace amounts in human and rodent bile.13 In traditional Chinese medicine, UDCA isolated from bear bile has been administered as a remedy for liver diseases for almost 3000 y.14 In the 20th century, UDCA was discovered by Western medicine as a compound capable of dissolving gallstones and inducing choleresis, an increased bile flow.15 Today UDCA is used to treat various cholestatic liver diseases, for example primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis or intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.14 UDCA exerts its beneficial anti-cholestatic effect by several different but possibly linked mechanisms in hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. In hepatocytes, UDCA increases secretion by stimulating the expression of transporter proteins required for secretory processes, for example the bile salt export pump (BSEP) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2),16 and by increasing the insertion rate of these proteins into the apical membrane.17 Furthermore, UDCA was shown to have anti-apoptotic effects in hepatocytes.18 Cholangiocytes are constantly exposed to high concentrations of hydrophobic bile acids, which can damage the plasma membrane leading to cholangiocyte malfunction.19 UDCA, a relatively hydrophilic bile acid counteracts this membrane-damaging effect in vitro.20,21 In addition, UDCA can stimulate secretion of cholangiocytes indirectly via intracellular signaling cascades that affect apically located proteins involved in secretion, e.g., purinergic PY receptors and the chloride channel CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator).22

In this addendum to our previous study12 we demonstrate that the removal of extracellular divalent cations potentiates the activation of BASIC by bile acids. Furthermore, we demonstrate that UDCA robustly activates rBASIC.

Results and Discussion
rBASIC is strongly inhibited by extracellular Mg2+

We had previously shown that removal of extracellular Ca2+ opens rBASIC, suggesting that Ca2+ strongly stabilizes the inactive, resting state of rBASIC.6 Here we determined the current amplitude of rBASIC with different concentrations of extracellular Mg2+ in the absence of Ca2+, revealing that Mg2+ also strongly inhibited rBASIC with an IC50 of 79 ± 10 μM (n = 8; Fig. 1). Thus, apparent affinity of Mg2+-inhibition was 6-fold lower than of Ca2+-inhibition (13 ± 2 μM, n = 8, p < 0.01; Fig. 1), showing that both, Ca2+ and Mg2+, tightly control rBASIC activity and stabilize its resting state.

rBASIC activation by bile acids is potentiated by removal of divalent cations

Next, we tested whether removal of extracellular divalent cations affects the activation of BASIC by HDCA and whether it can further increase BASIC activity in the presence of a maximal concentration of HDCA. We used Mg2+-free solutions and determined the EC50 of BASIC for HDCA both in the presence (1.8 mM) and the absence (10 nM) of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 2). Similar to our previous study,12 we found that 2 mM HDCA did not change the concentration of free Ca2+ compared with standard bath (not shown), ruling out an unspecific effect via chelation of Ca2+. EC50 for HDCA was modestly increased from 2.1 ± 0.04 mM in the presence of Ca2+ to 1.6 ± 0.05 mM in its absence (n = 8, p < 0.01; Fig. 2B). Moreover, at any concentration of HDCA, the current amplitudes induced by HDCA were three- to four-fold higher in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ than in its presence (Fig. 2). Thus, removal of Ca2+ potentiated activation by HDCA.

Removal of divalent cations not only opens BASIC but also changes its ion selectivity.6 Therefore, we previously proposed that removal of divalent cations does not simply unblock the BASIC pore but induces a conformational change that is associated with open gating of the channel.6 Assuming a pure effect of divalent cations on gating, potentiation of the BASIC current by removal of Ca2+ at a maximal concentration of HDCA suggests that HDCA is a partial agonist that does not induce full BASIC activity. Likewise, the similar HDCA concentration-response relationship in the presence and absence of Ca2+ suggests that HDCA further increases BASIC activity even when Ca2+ was not bound to the channel. These results, thus, argue that removal of Ca2+ and HDCA gate BASIC by an allosteric mechanism, meaning that removal of Ca2+ and bile acids use two independent molecular mechanisms to synergistically influence the activity of BASIC. At present we cannot exclude, however, that a block by Ca2+ of the open BASIC pore is the reason of the increased current amplitude after removal of Ca2+. Future studies determining the dependence of the open channel amplitude on Ca2+ will show whether Ca2+ has a pure gating effect on BASIC or a combined effect on gating and single channel amplitude.

rBASIC is activated by ursodeoxycholic acid

UDCA is structurally very similar to CDCA and HDCA, which strongly activate BASIC.12 UDCA and HDCA differ only in the position of one hydroxyl group: in UDCA, C-7 is hydroxylated, whereas in HDCA, C-6 is hydroxylated. The only difference between UDCA and CDCA is the steric orientation of the hydroxyl group at position C-7: in UDCA it is in the β-position, whereas in CDCA it is in the α-position (Fig. 3A). Because of this high similarity we reasoned that UDCA might also activate rBASIC. Indeed, UDCA robustly activated rBASIC when applied at a concentration of 2 mM. The current amplitude induced by UDCA was even significantly higher (3.0 ± 0.5 μA, n = 10) than the amplitude induced by the same concentration of HDCA (1.9 ± 0.3 μA, n = 10, p < 0.05; Fig. 3B). Activation of rBASIC by UDCA was concentration dependent, similar to activation by HDCA (Fig. 3C). The EC50 value for UDCA was 2.5 ± 0.04 mM (n = 10), similar to the EC50 for HDCA (2.1 ± 0.04 mM, n = 8). We have shown previously that when HDCA and CDCA are applied together at a concentration of 1.0 mM and 0.5 mM, respectively, they induce a significantly larger current amplitude than when applied individually, suggesting that both bile acids activate the channel synergisitically.12 The same applies for UDCA and CDCA (Fig. 3D). UDCA at a concentration of 1 mM together with 0.5 mM CDCA induced a 3-fold larger current (2.4 ± 0.3 μA, n = 10) than UDCA applied alone at a concentration of 1.5 mM (0.7 ± 0.1 μA, n = 10, p < 0.01), suggesting that CDCA and UDCA synergistically activate rBASIC.

Whether the effect of UDCA on rBASIC activity is of any physiological or clinical relevance remains to be elucidated but it is tempting to speculate that rBASIC is involved in absorptive and/or secretory processes in cholangiocytes and that it might represent an hitherto unknown molecular target of UDCA. BASIC is a cation channel, however, and cation reabsorption by cholangiocytes would lead to a net fluid absorption and thus reduced bile flow, which contradicts the anticholestatic effect of UDCA. Future results will show whether BASIC contributes to cation transport in bile ducts and whether it promotes secretion or absorption by the bile duct epithelium.


Despite our recent progress regarding the expression pattern of BASIC in cholangiocytes and regarding its activation by bile acids, we are still far away from understanding the physiological role of BASIC in these cells, let alone its role in other tissues such as the intestinal tract or the brain. In future studies it will therefore be important to confirm expression of BASIC in cholangiocytes and to discover its cellular and subcellular expression pattern in other tissues. Furthermore it will be necessary to study BASIC in a native cell or a native epithelium or both, to unravel its role in ion transport mediated by these cells and epithelia.


Previously published online:


This work was supported by the START-program of the Faculty of Medicine of RWTH Aachen University. H.E.W. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WA 2557/2-1, SFB-TRR57) and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung.


ASIC acid-sensing ion channel
BASIC bile acid-sensitive ion channel
BLINaC brain liver intestine Na+ channel
β-MCA β-muricholic acid
CA cholic acid
CDCA chenodeoxycholic acid
ENaC epithelial Na+ channel
HDCA hyodeoxycholic acid
HyNaC Hydra Na+ channel
INaC intestine Na+ channel
UDCA ursodeoxycholic acid

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

1. Kellenberger S,Schild L. Epithelial sodium channel/degenerin family of ion channels: a variety of functions for a shared structurePhysiol RevYear: 2002827356712087134
2. Gründer S,Chen X. Structure, function, and pharmacology of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs): focus on ASIC1aInt J Physiol Pathophysiol PharmacolYear: 20102739421383888
3. Waldmann R,Champigny G,Bassilana F,Heurteaux C,Lazdunski M. A proton-gated cation channel involved in acid-sensingNatureYear: 1997386173710.1038/386173a09062189
4. Sakai H,Lingueglia E,Champigny G,Mattei MG,Lazdunski M. Cloning and functional expression of a novel degenerin-like Na+ channel gene in mammalsJ PhysiolYear: 19995193233310.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0323m.x10457052
5. Schaefer L,Sakai H,Mattei M,Lazdunski M,Lingueglia E. Molecular cloning, functional expression and chromosomal localization of an amiloride-sensitive Na(+) channel from human small intestineFEBS LettYear: 20004712051010.1016/S0014-5793(00)01403-410767424
6. Wiemuth D,Gründer S. A single amino acid tunes Ca2+ inhibition of brain liver intestine Na+ channel (BLINaC)J Biol ChemYear: 2010285304041010.1074/jbc.M110.15306420656685
7. Wiemuth D,Gründer S. The pharmacological profile of brain liver intestine Na+ channel: inhibition by diarylamidines and activation by fenamatesMol PharmacolYear: 201180911910.1124/mol.111.07372621828194
8. Chen X,Qiu L,Li M,Dürrnagel S,Orser BA,Xiong ZG,et al. Diarylamidines: high potency inhibitors of acid-sensing ion channelsNeuropharmacologyYear: 20105810455310.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.01.01120114056
9. Dürrnagel S,Kuhn A,Tsiairis CD,Williamson M,Kalbacher H,Grimmelikhuijzen CJ,et al. Three homologous subunits form a high affinity peptide-gated ion channel in HydraJ Biol ChemYear: 2010285119586510.1074/jbc.M109.05999820159980
10. Golubovic A,Kuhn A,Williamson M,Kalbacher H,Holstein TW,Grimmelikhuijzen CJ,et al. A peptide-gated ion channel from the freshwater polyp HydraJ Biol ChemYear: 20072823509810310.1074/jbc.M70684920017911098
11. Lingueglia E,Champigny G,Lazdunski M,Barbry P. Cloning of the amiloride-sensitive FMRFamide peptide-gated sodium channelNatureYear: 1995378730310.1038/378730a07501021
12. Wiemuth D,Sahin H,Falkenburger BH,Lefèvre CM,Wasmuth HE,Gründer S. BASIC--a bile acid-sensitive ion channel highly expressed in bile ductsFASEB JYear: 20122641223010.1096/fj.12-20704322735174
13. Hofmann AF. Pharmacology of ursodeoxycholic acid, an enterohepatic drugScand J Gastroenterol SupplYear: 199420411510.3109/003655294091036187824870
14. Beuers U. Drug insight: Mechanisms and sites of action of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestasisNat Clin Pract Gastroenterol HepatolYear: 200633182810.1038/ncpgasthep052116741551
15. Leuschner U,Leuschner M,Sieratzki J,Kurtz W,Hübner K. Gallstone dissolution with ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with chronic active hepatitis and two years follow-up. A pilot studyDig Dis SciYear: 198530642910.1007/BF013084134006646
16. Fickert P,Zollner G,Fuchsbichler A,Stumptner C,Pojer C,Zenz R,et al. Effects of ursodeoxycholic and cholic acid feeding on hepatocellular transporter expression in mouse liverGastroenterologyYear: 20011211708310.1053/gast.2001.2554211438506
17. Beuers U,Bilzer M,Chittattu A,Kullak-Ublick GA,Keppler D,Paumgartner G,et al. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid inserts the apical conjugate export pump, Mrp2, into canalicular membranes and stimulates organic anion secretion by protein kinase C-dependent mechanisms in cholestatic rat liverHepatologyYear: 20013312061610.1053/jhep.2001.2403411343250
18. Benz C,Angermüller S,Töx U,Klöters-Plachky P,Riedel HD,Sauer P,et al. Effect of tauroursodeoxycholic acid on bile-acid-induced apoptosis and cytolysis in rat hepatocytesJ HepatolYear: 1998289910610.1016/S0168-8278(98)80208-09537871
19. Fickert P,Fuchsbichler A,Wagner M,Zollner G,Kaser A,Tilg H,et al. Regurgitation of bile acids from leaky bile ducts causes sclerosing cholangitis in Mdr2 (Abcb4) knockout miceGastroenterologyYear: 20041272617410.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.00915236191
20. Fickert P,Zollner G,Fuchsbichler A,Stumptner C,Weiglein AH,Lammert F,et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid aggravates bile infarcts in bile duct-ligated and Mdr2 knockout mice via disruption of cholangiolesGastroenterologyYear: 200212312385110.1053/gast.2002.3594812360485
21. Van Nieuwkerk CM,Elferink RP,Groen AK,Ottenhoff R,Tytgat GN,Dingemans KP,et al. Effects of Ursodeoxycholate and cholate feeding on liver disease in FVB mice with a disrupted mdr2 P-glycoprotein geneGastroenterologyYear: 19961111657110.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm86981958698195
22. Fiorotto R,Spirlì C,Fabris L,Cadamuro M,Okolicsanyi L,Strazzabosco M. Ursodeoxycholic acid stimulates cholangiocyte fluid secretion in mice via CFTR-dependent ATP secretionGastroenterologyYear: 200713316031310.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.07117983806


[Figure ID: F1]

Figure 1. rBASIC is inhibited by physiological concentrations of extracellular Ca2+ and Mg2+. (A) Upper panel, representative current trace from rBASIC-expressing oocytes recorded in the absence of Mg2+ and decreasing [Ca2+]e. Lower panel, representative current trace recorded in the absence of Ca2+ and decreasing [Mg2+]e. The dotted lines represent the 0 current level. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of rBASIC by extracellular Ca2+ (closed circles) and Mg2+ (open circles). Currents were normalized to the current in the presence of 10 nM Ca2+ or Mg2+, respectively. Error bars = S.E.M., n = 8. Curves represent fits to the Hill-equation. Holding potential was -70 mV.

[Figure ID: F2]

Figure 2. rBASIC activation by bile acids is potentiated by removal of extracellular divalent cations. (A) Representative current traces from rBASIC-expressing oocytes showing the concentration-dependent activation of rBASIC by HDCA in the presence of 1.8 mM extracellular Ca2+ and 1.0 mM extracellular Mg2+ (upper panel) or of 10 nM Ca2+ and 0 Mg2+ (“-Ca2+”) (lower panel). Dotted lines represent the 0 current level. (B) Concentration-response curves for HDCA in the presence of 1.8 mM extracellular Ca2+ and 1.0 mM extracellular Mg2+ (closed circles) or of 10 nM Ca2+ and 0 Mg2+ (open circles). Error bars = S.E.M., n = 8. Curves represent fits to the Hill-equation.

[Figure ID: F3]

Figure 3. rBASIC is activated by ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). (A) Structures of cheno-, hyo- and ursodeoxycholic acid. The different hydroxylgroups are highlighted with dashed circles. Structures were drawn using CS ChemDraw Ultra (CambridgeSoft) based on structures available from PubChem ( (B) rBASIC activation by UDCA is stronger than by HDCA. Upper panel, representative current trace from an rBASIC-expressing oocyte showing the activation of rBASIC by individual application of 2 mM HDCA or UDCA. Dotted line represents the 0 current level. Lower panel, quantitative comparison of current amplitudes induced by HDCA (gray bar) and UDCA (black bar). Currents were normalized to the current induced by the removal of extracellular divalent cations (10 nM Ca2+, 0 Mg2+; “-Ca2+”) which was 3.6 ± 0.5 μA (n = 10). Error bars = SEM (C) Upper panel, representative current trace from an rBASIC-expressing oocyte showing the concentration-dependent activation of rBASIC by UDCA. Lower panel, concentration-response curve for UDCA. Currents were normalized to the maximum current in the presence of 5 mM UDCA, which was 13.2 ± 1.1 μA (n = 8). Error bars = SEM. Curve represents a fit to the Hill-equation. (D) CDCA potentiates the activation of rBASIC by UDCA. Upper panel, representative current trace showing the activation of rBASIC by individual application of 1.5 mM UDCA and by co-application of 1.0 mM UDCA and 0.5 mM CDCA, respectively. Lower panel, quantitative comparison of current amplitudes induced by UDCA (gray bar) and UDCA/CDCA (black bar). Currents were normalized to the current induced by the removal of extracellular divalent cations (“-Ca2+”) which was 2.9 ± 0.4 μA (n = 10). Error bars = SEM.

Article Categories:
  • Article Addendum

Keywords: Keywords: acid-sensing ion channel, ASIC, BASIC, bile acid, BLINaC, cholangiocyte, DEG/ENaC, ENaC, epithelial Na+ channel.

Previous Document:  The design, synthesis, in silico ADME profiling, antiplasmodial and antimycobacterial evaluation of ...
Next Document:  Potassium channels in articular chondrocytes.