Document Detail


Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically ill: a meta-analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  1835294     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To examine the differential effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis on overt bleeding, clinically important bleeding, and mortality in critically ill patients. DATA IDENTIFICATION: Computerized bibliographic search of published and unpublished research. STUDY SELECTION: Independent review of 168 articles identified 42 relevant randomized trials for inclusion. DATA ABSTRACTION: The validity, population, intervention, and outcomes of each trial were evaluated. RESULTS: Stress ulcer prophylaxis with antacids (odds ratio 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.79]) or histamine-2-receptor antagonists (odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.17 to 0.45]) decreases the incidence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Histamine-2-receptor antagonists are more effective than antacids at reducing overt hemorrhage (odds ratio 0.56 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.97]). A significant reduction in clinically important gastrointestinal hemorrhage is evident only with histamine-2-receptor antagonist therapy. There is a trend favoring antacids over sucralfate in the outcome of clinically important bleeding (odds ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.16 to 2.49]); however, there are insufficient data to evaluate histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate. No difference in mortality between treated and untreated patients was found. CONCLUSIONS: Overt gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients is reduced by prophylaxis with antacids or histamine-2-receptor antagonists. Histamine-2-receptor antagonists are more effective than antacids at decreasing overt bleeding and are more effective than no treatment at reducing the incidence of clinically important bleeding. Mortality rates in the intensive care unit are not decreased by stress ulcer prophylaxis.
Authors:
D J Cook; L G Witt; R J Cook; G H Guyatt
Related Documents :
18559804 - Adverse effects of medical cannabinoids: a systematic review.
20585644 - Depression, antidepressant use and mortality in later life: the health in men study.
15320674 - Low vs. high glycemic index carbohydrate gel ingestion during simulated 64-km cycling t...
23060834 - Cardiac threat appraisal and depression after first myocardial infarction.
12683264 - The new and evolving pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia.
19089894 - Goal achievement provides new insights into interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of medicine     Volume:  91     ISSN:  0002-9343     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Med.     Publication Date:  1991 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1991-12-18     Completed Date:  1991-12-18     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0267200     Medline TA:  Am J Med     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  519-27     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, McMaster Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Critical Care / methods*
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / prevention & control
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Peptic Ulcer / prevention & control*
Stress, Physiological*
Comments/Corrections
Erratum In:
Am J Med 1991 Dec;91(6):670

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Public screening for lung disease: experience with the NIH Lung Health Study.
Next Document:  Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis in Down's syndrome.