|Stress-mediated p38 activation promotes somatic cell reprogramming.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 23044805 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Environmental stress-mediated adaptation plays essential roles in the evolution of life. Cellular adaptation mechanisms usually involve the regulation of chromatin structure, transcription, mRNA stability and translation, which eventually lead to efficient changes in gene expression. Global epigenetic change is also involved in the reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by defined factors. Here we report that environmental stress such as hyperosmosis not only facilitates four factor-mediated reprogramming, but also enhances two or one factor-induced iPS cell generation. Hyperosmosis-induced p38 activation plays a critical role in this process. Constitutive active p38 mimics the positive effect of hyperosmosis, while dominant negative p38 and p38 inhibitor block the effect of hyperosmosis. Further study indicates stress-mediated p38 activation may promote reprogramming by reducing the global DNA methylation level and enhancing the expression of pluripotency genes. Our results demonstrate how simple environmental stress like hyperosmosis helps to alter the fate of cells via intracellular signaling and epigenetic modulation.|
|Xinxiu Xu; Quan Wang; Yuan Long; Ru Zhang; Xiaoyuan Wei; Mingzhe Xing; Haifeng Gu; Xin Xie|
Related Documents :
|23263745 - Microrna-183 upregulates hif-1α by targeting isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (idh2) in glio...
23300015 - Retinol binding protein 4 stimulates hepatic sterol regulatory element-binding protein ...
24890415 - Bmp signaling participates in late phase differentiation of the retina, partly via upre...
24816265 - Post-transcriptional regulation in osteoblasts using localized delivery of mir-29a inhi...
12392995 - Myocardin: a component of a molecular switch for smooth muscle differentiation.
20570735 - Identification and characterization of a cystatin gene from chinese mitten crab erioche...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2012-10-09|
|Title: Cell research Volume: 23 ISSN: 1748-7838 ISO Abbreviation: Cell Res. Publication Date: 2013 Jan|
|Created Date: 2013-01-03 Completed Date: 2013-06-18 Revised Date: 2013-07-11|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9425763 Medline TA: Cell Res Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 131-41 Citation Subset: IM|
|Laboratory of Receptor-based Bio-medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
DNA Methylation / drug effects
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells / cytology, drug effects, metabolism*
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Nuclear Reprogramming* / drug effects
Sodium Chloride / pharmacology
Teratoma / pathology
Transcription Factors / genetics, metabolism
p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases / metabolism*
|0/Transcription Factors; 7647-14-5/Sodium Chloride; EC 184.108.40.206/p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Cell Res
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Cell Res
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Copyright © 2013 Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Received Day: 30 Month: 03 Year: 2012
Revision Received Day: 26 Month: 07 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 17 Month: 08 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 01 Year: 2013
Electronic publication date: Day: 09 Month: 10 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 1 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Volume: 23 Issue: 1
First Page: 131 Last Page: 141
PubMed Id: 23044805
Publisher Item Identifier: cr2012143
|Stress-mediated p38 activation promotes somatic cell reprogramming Alternate Title:P38 activation promotes reprogramming|
1Laboratory of Receptor-based Bio-medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2Stake Key Laboratory of Drug Research, the National Center for Drug Screening, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
|*Tel: +86-21-50801313 ex 156
Environmental stress has long been associated with numerous human diseases. Nevertheless, not all stress is harmful. Instead, environmental stress below the mutation threshold might play an essential role in the adaptation and evolution of life1. Classical responses of animals to stress, such as the 'fight-or-flight response' or 'general adaptation syndrome', are controlled by hormones at the organismal level2. At the cellular level, the adaptation mechanisms usually involve efficient changes in the gene expression programs mediated by intracellular signaling networks. Regulation of chromatin structure, transcription, mRNA stability and translation are some of the critical steps for cells to achieve generic and specific responses to different stresses3.
Somatic cells can be reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by ectopic expression of defined factors4. The exact underlying mechanisms remain unclear, but a global epigenetic change is believed to be involved in iPS induction5. To avoid the use of oncogenes and incorporation of viral DNA sequences, and to make iPS cells more amenable for therapeutic application, many efforts have been taken to modify the original protocol by using reduced number of factors6, non-integrating gene delivery approaches7, or cell permeable proteins to trigger the reprogramming8. A number of small molecules, especially those affecting epigenetic modulations, such as VPA, butyrate, BIX-01294 and 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza), have also been reported to facilitate iPS cell induction9.
To identify better small molecule enhancers of reprogramming, we developed a screening system with 96-well plates. Unexpectedly, we found that iPS cells appeared earlier and the induction efficiency was higher in the corner wells than the center ones. After ruling out the possible effect of pH and nutritional changes, we discovered that it was the increased osmotic pressure in the corner wells that facilitated iPS cell generation. Hyperosmosis not only facilitated four factor-mediated reprogramming, but also enhanced two or one factor-induced iPS cell generation in combination with other chemicals. Hyperosmosis has been reported to activate many stress-related signaling pathways, including the MAPK pathways10. Our study indicated that hyperosmosis-induced p38 activation played a critical role in facilitating reprogramming. The constitutive active p38 mimicked the positive effect of hyperosmosis, while dominant negative p38 and p38 inhibitor PD169316 blocked the effect of hyperosmosis. Further study indicates stress-mediated p38 activation might promote reprogramming by reducing the global DNA methylation level and enhancing the expression of pluripotency genes. We thus demonstrate how simple environmental stress like hyperosmosis could help to alter the fate of cells via intracellular signaling and epigenetic modulation.
We established a 96-well-plate-based chemical screening system for four-factor (4F)-induced reprogramming in OG2 MEFs which carry a transgenic Oct4 promoter driven-GFP reporter11 (Supplementary information, Figure S1A). We unexpectedly observed that the reprogramming efficiency at the corner wells were higher than the center ones. Corner or edge effects are generally associated with increased osmotic pressure and pH. By using NaCl and NaHCO3 to mimic the osmotic and pH changes, we found only the addition of NaCl (50-100 mM) significantly increased the number of GFP+ colonies. Change of pH or the percent of serum did not affect iPS cell generation (Supplementary information, Figure S1B). More careful analyses indicated NaCl supplementation not only increased the number of GFP+ colonies, but also shortened the reprogramming process. At day 8, more than 10 GFP+ colonies could be observed in NaCl-added wells (5 000 MEFs/well), while the control wells had almost none (Figure 1A). The non-ionic osmotic pressure regulator, sucrose (200 mM)12, also increased the reprogramming efficiency by ∼10-fold in 4F-transduced MEFs (Figure 1B). At day 14, FACS data revealed a remarkable enhancement of reprogramming efficiency with > 20% cells being GFP+ (Figure 1C).
To clarify whether hyperosmosis facilitates the reprogramming process or promotes the self-renewal of iPS cells after reprogramming, we treated the 4F-transduced MEF cells with 100 mM NaCl for 72 h starting on day 3, 6, or 9. Starting NaCl treatment on day 9 had no beneficial effect, instead it slightly reduced the number of GFP+ colonies. In contrast, there was a statistically significant 8- and 6-fold increase in the number of GFP+ colonies in the cultures treated with NaCl starting on day 3 and 6, respectively (Figure 1D and Supplementary information, Figure S1C). We also treated the 4F-transduced MEF cells with 50 mM or 100 mM NaCl for various durations starting from day 3. The early stage of reprogramming (day 3-8) benefited most from the hyperosmotic stress, since prolonged elevation of osmotic pressure did not further increase the reprogramming efficiency (Figure 1E). In fact, prolonged hyperosmotic stress (treatment beyond day 10) caused reduction in colony size and eventual reduction in colony number, indicating a cytotoxic effect. So the treatment duration for most of the later experiments was day 3-8. On fully reprogrammed iPS clones, hyperosmosis reduced the GFP+ area and total GFP intensity, indicating the condition was harmful to iPS cells (Supplementary information, Figure S1D and S1E). MTT assay also revealed reduced viability in iPS cells when cultured in hyperosmotic condition (Supplementary information, Figure S1F). These data suggest that hyperosmosis promotes the generation of iPS colonies by facilitating the reprogramming process rather than enhancing the proliferation or self-renewal of iPS cells.
Next we tested NaCl in combination with two reported reprogramming enhancers, VPA and LiCl13,14. The combination of NaCl and VPA at low doses displayed a synergistic effect in enhancing reprogramming, while the combination of high doses did not even show additive effect. Similar to NaCl, VPA also reduced the GFP+area, total GFP intensity and cell viability in fully reprogrammed iPS cells (Supplementary information, Figure S2C-S2E). The combination of VPA and NaCl at high doses displayed higher toxicity towards iPS cells, which might compromise their effects in enhancing reprogramming. Similar synergistic effect between low dose of NaCl and low dose of LiCl was also observed (Supplementary information, Figure S2B).
Hyperosmosis also facilitated reprogramming mediated by reduced number of factors and chemicals (Figure 1F). In OK, CHIR99021 and parnate-mediated reprogramming, NaCl (50 mM) led to a 5-fold increase in the number of GFP+ colonies at day 14. In OS, CHIR99021, Repsox and parnate-mediated reprogramming, hyperosmotic condition further improved the efficiency by 4-fold at day 18. And the effect of the chemical combination (VPA, CHIR99021, parnate and Repsox) that successfully facilitated the one factor (Oct4)-induced reprogramming was further enhanced by 3-fold in the hyperosmotic condition when examined at day 20 (Figure 1F).
PCR of genomic DNA of 2F (OK or OS)- or 1F(O)-iPS clones confirmed the integration of the indicated but not the other retroviral factors (Supplementary information, Figure S3A and S3B). Real-time PCR analysis confirmed the reactivation of the endogenous Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Rex1 and the silencing of viral genes in these iPS clones (Supplementary information, Figure S3C and S3D). These iPS cells maintain GFP expression and ES-like morphology, and express typical pluripotency markers, such as alkaline phosphatase, SSEA1 and Nanog (Figure 2A). Bisulfite genomic sequencing analyses of the Oct4 and Nanog promoters revealed that both were demethylated in iPS cells, similar to mES cells and in contrast to the parental MEFs (Figure 2B). Subcutaneous injection of the iPS cells into NOD-SCID mice led to teratoma formation, with tissues derived from all three germ layers (Figure 2C). We obtained adult chimaeras from all three clones (OK-1, OS-1 and O-1) as determined by coat color (Figure 2D and Supplementary information, Table S3). One of the male chimaeras from clone OK-1 was crossed with ICR females and 7 of the total 47 F1 mice showed agouti coat color (Figure 2E and Supplementary information, Table S3), confirming germline transmission.
Hyperosmosis was reported to activate many stress-related signaling pathways10. We found hyperosmosis significantly activated JNK and p38, two major regulators of stress responses, and to a lesser extent, the ERK pathway (Figure 3A and 3B). Blocking JNK and ERK pathways with SP600125 and PD98059 further enhanced the positive effect of hyperosmosis on reprogramming (Figure 3C). The result agrees with previous reports that the activation of ERK and JNK pathways was detrimental to iPS cell induction15. Interestingly, blocking hyperosmosis induced-p38 activation with PD169316 totally abolished its promoting effect on reprogramming (Figure 3C). Anisomycin and TNF-α, two well known activators of p38 and its downstream target MAPKAPK2 (MK2) (Supplementary information, Figure S4A, S4B and S4D), also enhanced iPS cell generation and such enhancement was blocked by PD169316 (Figure 3D). Sucrose also activated the p38 pathway in MEF cells (Supplementary information, Figure S4C). In contrast, VPA was believed to enhance reprogramming via HDAC inhibition. It did not induce p38 activation and its effect was not blocked by PD169316 (Supplementary information, Figure S4E and S4F).
To confirm the role of p38 in reprogramming, we constructed the constitutively active (CA)-p38, which contains D176A and F327S mutations16, and the dominant negative (DN)-p38 with T180A and Y182F mutations17. Western blot analysis confirmed the expression and correct function of these constructs (Supplementary information, Figure S5). When expressed in MEFs, only the CA-p38 promoted 4F-driven iPS cell generation in standard iso-osmotic medium. WT-p38 and DN-p38 had no effect. However, in hyperosmotic medium, DN-p38 totally blocked hyperosmosis-enhanced reprogramming (Figure 3E). Similar to NaCl treatment, the CA-p38 was only beneficial at the reprogramming stage. If CA-p38 was blocked with PD169316 at early reprogramming stage (before day 9), no enhancement was observed (Figure 3F). But if PD169316 was added after day 15, prolonged activation of p38 also caused reduction in iPS colonies (Figure 3F). The time courses of NaCl and CA-p38 on reprogramming were slightly different, which was probably due to the variable degrees of p38 activation.
Endogenous expression of Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 is essential for successful reprogramming of somatic cells. During the 4F-mediated reprogramming, hyperosmotic stress induced a significant increase in Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 mRNA transcription (Figure 4A). By using luciferase reporters driven by the promoters of Nanog, Oct4 or Sox2, we found hyperosmosis significantly activated all these promoters without the presence of Yamanaka factors (Figure 4B). Interestingly, p38 inhibitor PD169316 (10 μM) only blocked the activation of Nanog and Sox2 reporters, but not the Oct4 reporter (Figure 4B), indicating the involvement of other pathways in the activation of Oct4 transcription by hyperosmosis. DNA methylation levels at the loci of Oct4 and Nanog promoters after NaCl treatment were determined by bisulfite sequencing. As shown in Figure 4C, 4D and Supplementary information, Figure S6, more than 60% of the CpGs in the promoter regions of Oct4 and Nanog were methylated in MEFs. In contrast, ES cells had almost no methylation in the promoter regions of these genes. NaCl treatment significantly reduced the level of methylation in both Oct4 and Nanog promoters, supporting that hyperosmotic conditions can facilitate the activation of these pluripotency genes.
Hyperosmotic stress has been reported to activate many genes critical for cell differentiation, including Keratin K1 and K10 for epidermal differentiation, and MEF2 for skeletal muscle differentiation18,19. P38 activation has also been found to induce cell differentiation20. The fact that hyperosmosis and p38 activation facilitate both differentiation and reprogramming led us to speculate that stress might affect gene transcription at a global level. Using dot blot analysis, we found NaCl (100 mM) treatment significantly reduced the DNA methylation level in MEFs. Similar level of demethylation was also observed in MEFs treated with the DNA methytransferase inhibitor 5-Aza (10 mM). P38 inhibitor PD169316 (10 μM) significantly reversed hyperosmosis-mediated DNA demethylation, though it did not block 5-Aza-induced DNA demethylation (Figure 4E). Interestingly, salt stress has also been reported to alter DNA methylation in certain plants21. In MEFs transfected with CA-p38, the 5mC level was also significantly lower compared to the control, and this effect was blocked by PD169316 (10 μM). The DN-p38 did not affect the 5mC level by itself, but it prevented NaCl-induced demethylation of DNA (Figure 4F). HPLC was also used to quantify the 5mC levels. As shown in Figure 4G, NaCl treatment significantly reduced the level of 5mC, and this effect was blocked by PD169316. 5-Aza also induced a similar level of demethylation in the genomic DNA of MEFs, but PD169316 could not block 5-Aza-induced DNA demethylation. Then we measured 5mC levels in MEF genomic DNA after forced expression of CA-p38 or DN-p38. CA-p38 significantly decreased 5mC level, and this decrease was blocked by PD169316. DN-p38 had no effect on the methylation level of genomic DNA, but it blocked NaCl-induced demethylation (Figure 4H). Taken together, these data indicate hyperosmotic stress might affect gene transcription by reducing the globel DNA methylation level, and this effect is mediated mainly via the p38 pathway.
Animal development from fertilized, totipotent eggs to individuals is an epigenetically programmed process and was believed to be irreversible in mammals. The groundbreaking work by Yamanaka in 2006 demonstrated that ectopic expression of defined transcription factors could reprogram murine somatic cells to iPS cells22. Shortly after that, human iPS cells were generated with similar strategy4,23. Many iPS cells were extensively characterized and are similar to ES cells in their gene expression patterns and chromatin signatures24; some mouse iPS cells can develop into individuals after tetraploid complementation, the most stringent pluripotency test available25.
Apparently, reprogramming leads to the silencing of somatic genes and reactivation of pluripotency genes concomitant with the resetting of chromatin structure, though the identity of the major chromatin-modifying factors involved in this process remains largely unclear. Higher histone acetylation levels are generally associated with more open chromatin structure and elevated gene expression. Treatment with HDAC inhibitors such as VPA and butyrate results in an enhancement of reprogramming. Methylation at histone H3K9 is a repressive chromatin modification that hinders reprogramming. The histone H3K9 methyltransferase G9a inhibitor BIX-01294 also enhances reprogramming9. DNA methylation is another crucial part of epigenetic regulation. DNA methylation at the fifth position of cytosine has the specific effect of reducing gene expression and plays critical roles in normal cellular differentiation and organismal development26. Blocking DNA methylation with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-Aza has also been reported to facilitate iPS cell induction9. In this study we demonstrated that environmental stress such as hyperosmosis greatly facilitated iPS cell generation via activation of the p38 pathway. Further study indicates stress-mediated p38 activation might promote reprogramming by reducing the global DNA methylation level and enhancing the expression of pluripotency genes. Recently, hypoxia, another form of environmental stress, has also been reported to facilitate the generation of mouse and human iPS cells27. We found hypoxia (5% and 1% O2) induced a slight but notable increase (∼1.5-fold) in p38 phosphorylation (Supplementary information, Figure S4G and S4H). We speculate that p38 activation might play a role, but it is not likely to be the main mechanism of hypoxia-enhanced reprogramming. Other mechanisms, such as Hif-2α-mediated Oct4 transcription28, might play a more important role.
Dramatic change in gene expression is a major component of stress responses, and such change is achieved by the modulation of chromatin structure, transcription, mRNA stability and translation via intracellular signaling. Environmental stresses, such as osmostress, UV, heat stress, oxidative stress, heavy metals and chemicals, as well as physiological mediators, such as inflammatory cytokines, activate the highly conserved stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) pathways29. The p38 MAPKs are the mammalian orthologues of yeast SAPK Hog1, an osmo-sensing protein. Stresses with various sensing mechanisms converge through different MAP3Ks on p38, which in turn regulate the activity of downstream transcription factors and regulators of chromatin remodeling3. Hyperosmotic stress activates other signaling pathways in addition to p38. We also found hyperosmosis activated all three MAPK pathways, p38, JNK and ERK. It is interesting to note that only p38 activation contributed to the positive effect of hyperosmosis on reprogramming. In fact, the activation of the other two pathways was detrimental15 to iPS cell induction even though the summation of the signaling under hyperosmosis led to a beneficial effect. The duration of p38 activation was also critical to the enhancement effect, as prolonged treatment with hyperosmotic condition or constant activation of p38 eventually leads to less iPS cells. This is understandable since cells can quantify stress and activate a death program when tolerance limits are exceeded30.
Enhancement of reprogramming via p38 activation was surprising since p38 activation had long been associated with proliferation inhibition and differentiation induction. P38 activation also leads to p53-mediated premature senescence31, which has been reported to be the major roadblock of somatic cell reprogramming32. Nevertheless, we observed that hyperosmosis-induced p38 activation stimulated the expression of pluripotency genes with or without the treatment of Yamanaka factors. Several pluripotency genes, such as Sox2 and Myc, have also been found to be upregulated in MEFs in a whole genome analysis of p38-mediated gene expression upon stress33. Thus we speculate that a more general mechanism, rather than the expression of specific genes, might underlie the effect of stress-activated p38 on reprogramming. We found stress-mediated p38 activation led to a reduction of global DNA methylation level similar to the treatment of 5-Aza, and rendered the cells to enter an epigenetically unstable intermediate state. With the presence of Yamanaka factors or various differentiation cues, these cells are then more readily to be reprogrammed into the pluripotent state or induced to differentiate (Figure 4I).
In summary, we found stress-mediated p38 activation led to a reduction of global DNA methylation level, and rendered the cells to enter an epigenetically unstable intermediate state, resulting in a higher reprogramming efficiency. Our data not only provide a simple and safe way to facilitate the generation of iPS cells, but also demonstrate how simple environmental stress like hyperosmosis helps to alter the fate of cells via intracellular signaling and epigenetic modulation.
OG2 mice, which carry a transgenic Oct4 promoter driven GFP reporter, were mated with C57 mice and MEF cells were isolated from E12.5 embryos heterozygous for the Oct4-GFP transgenic allele. Gonads and internal organs were removed before processing for isolation of MEF cells. MEFs were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamax, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (NEAA), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Isolated MEF cells in early passages (up to passage 3) were used for further experiments.
Retrovirus were produced by transfection of plat-E cells with pMXs retroviral vectors containing the coding sequences of mouse Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc (obtained from Addgene). MEFs (passage 1-3) were seeded at a density of 150 000 cells per well in six-well plate 18 h before infection. Virus containing supernatants, supplemented with 4 μg/ml polybrene, were added onto the plates of MEF cell cultures and spined at 2 500 rpm for 90 min to ensure their infection. Medium was changed immediately after virus transduction and this day is counted as 'Day 0'. Two days post virus infection, MEFs were trypsinized into single cells and reseeded at a density of 5 000 cells per well on 96-well plates or 7 500 cells per well on 24-well plates pre-seeded with irradiated MEF feeders, supplemented with mES medium (DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamax, 0.1 mM NEAA, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol 1 000 U/ml LIF, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin). At day 6, culture medium was replaced with KSR medium (knockout-DMEM supplemented with 15% knockout serum replacement, 2 mM L-glutamax, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (NEAA), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 000 U/ml LIF, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin). NaCl or other chemicals were added from day 3 with various durations.
GFP+ colonies were scanned and counted using Acumen eX3 microplate scanner (TTP Labtech) or ImageXpress® Micro System (Moleculer Devices) from day 8 post infection. GFP+ colonies were also trypsinized and then analyzed using a FACS Calibur (BD). GFP+ cells were gated with a control signal from the PE channel and a minimum of 10 000 events were recorded.
For alkaline phosphatase staining, iPS cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 45 seconds, rinsed once with PBS and detection was performed using a leukocyte alkaline phosphatase kit (Sigma, catalog No 85L3R) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For immunofluorescent staining, cells were fixed with 4% PFA and incubated with primary antibodies against mSSEA-1 (Santa Cruz, sc-21702) and mNanog (Millipore, AB5731), followed by the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma). Images were taken with an Olympus IX51 inverted fluorescent microscope or an Olympus FV10i confocal microscope.
Total mRNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and 2 μg RNA were used to synthesize cDNA using PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (Takara, DRR037A) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Real-time PCR was performed using JumpStartTM TaqReady MixTM (Sigma, D7440) with Eva Green (Biotium) and analyzed with a Stratagene Mx 3000P thermal cycler. For semi-quantitative PCR analysis, the cDNA solution was amplified for 45 cycles at an optimal annealing temperature. Primers sequences are supplied in Supplementary information, Table S1.
Bisulfite sequencing was used to detect DNA methylation in the promoter regions of Oct4 and Nanog as described22. In brief, genomic DNA was isolated and bisulfite conversion was performed in agarose beads as described34. Nested PCR was performed to amplify the promoter regions after bisulfite conversion and the PCR products were cloned into pMD19-T vectors (Takara). Ten randomly selected clones from each sample were sequenced and analyzed. PCR primers are listed in Supplementary information, Table S2.
Cells were lysed, sonicated and boiled at 95-100 °C for 5 min in sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol, 1% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromophenyl blue (pH 6.8)). Cell lysates were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were first incubated with blocking buffer (TBS with 0.05% Tween 20, 10% nonfat milk) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4 °C in buffer containing rabbit anti-α-Tubulin (11H10) (1:10 000; CST 2125), rabbit anti-p38 (1:1 000; CST 9212), rabbit anti-p-p38(1:1 000; CST 9211), rabbit anti-JNK (1:1 000; CST 9258), rabbit anti-p-JNK(1:1 000; CST 4668), rabbit anti-ERK (1:1 000; CST 9102), rabbit anti-p-ERK(1:1 000; CST 4370), or rabbit anti-p-MK2 (1:1 000; CST 3316). The membranes were washed thrice and incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP (1:10 000) or goat anti-mouse IgG HRP (1:10 000) for 1 h. After washing, immunostaining was visualized using Western Lightning Ultra (Perkin Elmer) and ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad).
About 1 × 106 iPS cells were suspended in 200 μl mES medium and injected into NOD-SCID mice to form teratomas. Four weeks after injection, teratomas were harvested, fixed overnight with 4% PFA, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, hematoxylin and eosin stained and analyzed. For production of chimeric mice, zygotes were isolated from superovulated female ICR mice and iPS cells were injected into the resulting blastocysts. Chimeras were produced by implantation of injected blastocysts into the pseudopregnant ICR mice. The chimeras were crossed with ICR mice to confirm the germline transmission.
For Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 reporter activitiy, plasmids encoding promoter regions of Nanog (50 ng), Oct4 (100 ng) or Sox2 (25 ng) together with a firefly luciferase reporter were cotransfected with 25 ng Renilla luciferase driven by TK-promoter (Promega) into HEK293T cells seeded on 96-well plate at a density of 40 000 per well using Fugene HD (Roche). Chemicals were added 18 h after transfection and firefly and renilla luciferase activities were measured 24 h after drug treatment with the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) using an EnVision multilabel plate reader (Perkin Elmer).
MEFs were incubated in medium supplemented with 100 mM NaCl for 72 h. Genomic DNA was isolated using the DNA Isolation Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions and 200 ng DNA from each sample was dotted onto the nitrocellulose membrane (GE Amersham). Membrane was exposed to UV light for 5 min and then incubated in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temparature. Membrane was incubated overnight with the 5-mC antibody (Active motif 39649) in blocking buffer at 4 °C. After through washing, membrane was probed with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and visualized using Western Lightning Ultra and ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad).
The genomic DNA was extracted by phenol/chloroform then treated with RNase A/T1 twice (50 μg RNase A and 1 000 U RNase T1 per 100 μg DNA), at least 4 h each time. The DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform, precipitated in 70% ethanol, and dissolved in water. Approximately, 40 μg DNA was hydrolyzed with 0.1 U of nuclease P1 (Sigma) at 50 °C for at least 1 h or at 37 °C overnight (the reaction volume is 80 μl, containing 20 mM NaOAc, pH 5.3 and 0.2 mM ZnSO4). 8 μl of 10× CIAP buffer and 1 μl of calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (TaKaRa) were then added to the reaction followed by incubation for at least 2 h or overnight at 37 °C. The reaction products were then analyzed on an Agilent 1200 HPLC instrument with an AQ-C18 column (5-μm particle size, 25 cm × 4.6 mm). The mobile phase was 10 mM KH2PO4, pH 3.7, running at 1 ml per min, and the detector was set at 280 nm. Standard compounds 2′-deoxycytidine and 5-methyl 2′-deoxycytidine were bought from Sigma and TCI.
(Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Research website.)
We thank Qiuhong Hua for her technical assistance in iPS cell assay development. We thank Drs Min Gu and Yufei He for their technical assistance in HPLC operation. We thank professors David Engelberg and Helmut Holtmann for providing the original plasmids of p38 mutants. This project was supported by grants from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA01040301), Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2009CB940900, 2010CB944900, 2011CB965104, 2011DFB30010) and Shanghai Commission of Science and Technology (08DZ2291300, 09DZ2291200).
|Hochachka PW,Somero GN. edsBiochemical adaptation: Mechanism and process in physiological evolutionOxford University Press, USA, Year: 2002|
|Charmandari E,Tsigos C,Chrousos G. Endocrinology of the stress responseAnnu Rev PhysiolYear: 20056725928415709959|
|de Nadal E,Ammerer G,Posas F. Controlling gene expression in response to stressNat Rev GenetYear: 20111283384522048664|
|Takahashi K,Tanabe K,Ohnuki M,et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factorsCellYear: 200713186187218035408|
|Mattout A,Biran A,Meshorer E. Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cellsJ Mol Cell BiolYear: 2011334135022044880|
|Kim JB,Sebastiano V,Wu GM,et al. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cellsCellYear: 200913641141919203577|
|Stadtfeld M,Nagaya M,Utikal J,Weir G,Hochedlinger K. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integrationScienceYear: 200832294594918818365|
|Zhou HY,Wu SL,Joo JY,et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteinsCell Stem CellYear: 2009438138419398399|
|Feng B,Ng JH,Heng JCD,Ng HH. Molecules that promote or enhance reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cellsCell Stem CellYear: 2009430131219341620|
|Kultz D,Burg M. Evolution of osmotic stress signaling via MAP kinase cascadesJ Exp BiolYear: 1998201301530219787121|
|Shi Y,Desponts C,Do JT,Hahm HS,Scholer HR,Ding S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compoundsCell Stem CellYear: 2008356857418983970|
|Skjerdal OT,Sletta H,Flenstad SG,Josefsen KD,Levine DW,Ellingsen TE. Changes in intracellular composition in response to hyperosmotic stress of NaCl, sucrose or glutamic acid in Brevibacterium lactofermentum and Corynebacterium glutamicumAppl Microbiol BiotYear: 199644635642|
|Melton DA,Huangfu DW,Maehr R,et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compoundsNat BiotechnolYear: 20082679579718568017|
|Wang Q,Xu X,Li J,et al. Lithium, an anti-psychotic drug, greatly enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cellsCell ResYear: 2011211424143521727907|
|Silva J,Barrandon O,Nichols J,Kawaguchi J,Theunissen TW,Smith A. Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibitionPlos BiolYear: 2008622372247|
|Diskin R,Askari N,Capone R,Engelberg D,Livnah O. Active mutants of the human p38 alpha mitogen-activated protein kinaseJ Biol ChemYear: 2004279470404704915284239|
|Winzen R,Kracht M,Ritter B,et al. The p38 MAP kinase pathway signals for cytokine-induced mRNA stabilization via MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 and an AU-rich region-targeted mechanismEMBO JYear: 1999184969498010487749|
|Mammone T,Ingrassia M,Goyarts E. Osmotic stress induces terminal differentiation in cultured normal human epidermal keratinocytesIn Vitro Cell Dev Biol AnimYear: 20084413513918363074|
|Al-Khalili L,Chibalin AV,Yu M,et al. MEF2 activation in differentiated primary human skeletal muscle cultures requires coordinated involvement of parallel pathwaysAm J Physiol Cell PhysiolYear: 2004286C1410C141614960415|
|Li YQ,Jiang BH,Ensign WY,Vogt PK,Han JH. Myogenic differentiation requires signalling through both phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and p38 MAP kinaseCell SignalYear: 20001275175711152961|
|Verhoeven KJF,Jansen JJ,van Dijk PJ,Biere A. Stress-induced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelionsNew PhytolYear: 20101851108111820003072|
|Takahashi K,Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factorsCellYear: 200612666367616904174|
|Yu JY,Vodyanik MA,Smuga-Otto K,et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cellsScienceYear: 20073181917192018029452|
|Maherali N,Sridharan R,Xie W,et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contributionCell Stem CellYear: 20071557018371336|
|Kang L,Wang JL,Zhang Y,Kou ZH,Gao SR. iPS Cells can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryosCell Stem CellYear: 2009513513819631602|
|Cooper DN. Eukaryotic DNA MethylationHum GenetYear: 1983643153336194100|
|Yoshida Y,Takahashi K,Okita K,Ichisaka T,Yamanaka S. Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cellsCell Stem CellYear: 2009523724119716359|
|Covello KL,Kehler J,Yu HW,et al. HIF-2 alpha regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growthGene DevYear: 20062055757016510872|
|Zarubin T,Han JH. Activation and signaling of the p38 MAP kinase pathwayCell ResYear: 200515111815686620|
|Kultz D. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress responseAnnu Rev PhysiolYear: 20056722525715709958|
|Han J,Sun P. The pathways to tumor suppression via route p38Trends Biochem SciYear: 20073236437117624785|
|Marion RM,Strati K,Li H,et al. A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrityNatureYear: 20094601149115319668189|
|Ferreiro I,Joaquin M,Islam A,et al. Whole genome analysis of p38 SAPK-mediated gene expression upon stressBMC GenomicsYear: 20101114420187982|
|Hajkova P,el-Maarri O,Engemann S,Oswald J,Olek A,Walter J. DNA-methylation analysis by the bisulfite-assisted genomic sequencing methodMethods Mol BiolYear: 200220014315411951649|
(A) Schematic representation of iPS cell induction protocol with chemicals.
Supplementary information, Figure S2
(A) and (B) Synergistic effect of NaCl and VPA (A) or NaCl and LiCl (B) on iPS cell induction.
Supplementary information, Figure S3
(A) PCR analysis to confirm the absence of c-Myc and Klf4 integration in 2F (OS)-iPS clones.
Supplementary information, Figure S4
(A–C) Top: Representative western blot to detect the phosphorylation of p38 after anisomycin (Aniso 0.1 μM, A), TNFα (10 ng/ml, B) and sucrose (200 mM, C) treatment in MEFs.
Supplementary information, Figure S5
Retrovirus encoding the tagged wild-type (WT)-, constitutive active (CA)- or dominant negative (DN)-p38 were introduced into MEF cells.
Supplementary information, Figure S6
DNA methylation profile of the Oct4 and Nanog proximal promoters in MEFs treated with NaCl (100 mM) for 1, 3 or 5 days.
Supplementary information, Table S1
List of PCR primers
Supplementary information, Table S2
Primers used in bisulfite sequencing
Supplementary information, Table S3
Summary of chimeras generated with iPS cells and their F1 offspring
Keywords: induced pluripotent stem cells, iPS, hyperosmosis, NaCl, stress, p38, reprogramming.
Previous Document: In vitro generation of platelets through direct conversion: first report in My Knowledge (iMK).
Next Document: Association of XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD genetic polymorphism with an increased risk of hepatocellular c...