Document Detail


Strain-counterstrain to treat restrictions of the mobility of the cervical spine in patients with neck pain-A sham-controlled randomized trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23374199     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Strain-counterstrain is an osteopathic technique which is widely used for treating mobility restrictions in the neck. We aimed to investigate whether a single strain-counterstrain intervention is more effective than a sham intervention in improving restricted cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain.
METHODS: 61 adult patients with neck pain and restricted cervical mobility were randomly allocated to receive either a single strain-counterstrain intervention or a sham treatment. After outcome measurement all patients received full individualized osteopathic treatment. Mobility of the cervical spine was measured by a blinded observer using the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) tool. In addition, patients rated pain intensity and assessed the treatment effect. The main outcome measure was the sum of changes in mobility restriction (in %) after treatment compared to normal mobility.
RESULTS: All patients completed the study. Mobility restriction decreased by 2.0% (SD 6.9%) in the group receiving strain-counterstrain treatment and 0.6% (SD 5.7%) in the group receiving sham treatment (mean difference 1.5%, 95% confidence interval -1.7 to 4.8%; p=0.35). There were no significant differences between groups for secondary outcomes. After receiving the full osteopathic treatment the group initially receiving strain-counterstrain improved by another 4.2% (7.0%; p=0.003) and the group initially receiving sham by another 5.6% (SD 6.8%; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Strain-counterstrain as a single intervention did not have immediate effects on mobility and pain over a sham treatment. Future studies should probably focus on the investigation of full osteopathic treatment.
Authors:
Reinhold Klein; Alexa Bareis; Antonius Schneider; Klaus Linde
Related Documents :
22698299 - Recovery pattern of mandibular movement by active physical therapy after bilateral tran...
24732739 - Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analys...
23056719 - Comparing oral route paraffin oil versus rectal route for disimpaction in children with...
23477359 - Urinary functional outcomes and toxicity five years after proton therapy for low- and i...
23106879 - Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with "button-type" e...
24562599 - Long-term maintenance effect of radiofrequency energy delivery for refractory gerd: a d...
10697029 - Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus gemcit...
17145419 - Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a prospective...
21823769 - The college drinker's check-up: outcomes of two randomized clinical trials of a compute...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-12-07
Journal Detail:
Title:  Complementary therapies in medicine     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1873-6963     ISO Abbreviation:  Complement Ther Med     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-02-04     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9308777     Medline TA:  Complement Ther Med     Country:  Scotland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Institute of General Practice, Techni-sche Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Withdrawal effect of chronic amphetamine exposure during adolescence on complex maze performance.
Next Document:  Efficacy of cranial electric stimulation for the treatment of insomnia: A randomized pilot study.