Document Detail

Statistics of sexual size dimorphism.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10208795     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
In comparative studies of sexual size dimorphism (SSD), the methods used to quantify dimorphism are controversial. SSD is commonly expressed as a ratio between species mean values of males and females, such as M/F or (M-F)/([M+F]/2), but a number of investigators have suggested that ratios should not be used, mainly because their distributions usually violate the assumptions of parametric statistical tests, or because they lead to spurious relationships that invalidate the interpretation and statistical significance of regressions and correlations. As an alternative to ratios, the comparative study of SSD can be conducted by a combination of regression with sex-specific data and residuals from this regression. Twenty-five data sets were selected from the literature and used to duplicate a variety of statistical procedures commonly employed in studies of SSD. All analyses were repeated with five different ratios and with methods that avoid the calculation of any ratios. These data and a review of the statistical properties of ratios and residuals indicate that: (1) most of the ratios used in the SSD literature are unnecessary, and several commonly used ratios are statistically inferior to others. Only two ratios are needed, one on a logarithmic scale and one on a linear scale; (2) there is no problem with spurious correlation or non-normality when ratios are used in several types of statistical procedures commonly employed in studies of SSD; (3) residuals cannot replace ratios for the evaluation of many questions regarding the pattern of SSD among species; and (4) residuals usually are used incorrectly, leading to misspecified regression equations. Most of the questions for which residuals are used should be addressed by multiple regression. These results apply to studies using comparative methods with or without adjustments for phylogenetic effects.
R J Smith
Related Documents :
15639705 - Free knot splines for logistic models and threshold selection.
25410685 - A new method of building permanent a-v block model: ablating his-bundle potential throu...
19136735 - The consistency of ordinary least-squares and generalized least-squares polynomial regr...
8871375 - A bayesian approach to adult human age estimation from dental observations by johanson'...
19182135 - Choicekey: a real-time speech recognition program for psychology experiments with a sma...
395505 - Thermal perturbation differential spectra of ribonucleic acids. ii. nearest neighbour i...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of human evolution     Volume:  36     ISSN:  0047-2484     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Hum. Evol.     Publication Date:  1999 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-06-15     Completed Date:  1999-06-15     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0337330     Medline TA:  J Hum Evol     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  423-58     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
Department of Anthropology, Washington University, 1 Brookings Drive, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Body Constitution*
Sex Characteristics*
Statistics as Topic / methods*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Recognizing species diversity among large-bodied hominoids: a simulation test using missing data fin...
Next Document:  Solid-phase sequence scanning for drug resistance detection in tuberculosis.