Document Detail


Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21063801     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Achieving a good clinical trial design increases the likelihood that a trial will take place as planned, including that data will be obtained from a sufficient number of participants, and the total number of participants will be the minimal required to gain the knowledge sought. A good trial design also increases the likelihood that the knowledge sought by the experiment will be forthcoming. Achieving such a design is more than good sense-it is ethically required in experiments when participants are at risk of harm. This paper argues that doing a power analysis effectively contributes to ensuring that a trial design is good. The ethical importance of good trial design has long been recognized for trials in which there is risk of serious harm to participants. However, whether the quality of a trial design, when the risk to participants is only minimal, is an ethical issue is rarely discussed. This paper argues that even in cases when the risk is minimal, the quality of the trial design is an ethical issue, and that this is reflected in the emphasis the Belmont Report places on the importance of the benefit of knowledge gained by society. The paper also argues that good trial design is required for true informed consent.
Authors:
Sara H Vollmer; George Howard
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-11-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Science and engineering ethics     Volume:  16     ISSN:  1471-5546     ISO Abbreviation:  Sci Eng Ethics     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-07     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9516228     Medline TA:  Sci Eng Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  675-91     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, UAB Center for Ethics and Values in the Sciences, 900 13th St South, 414A, Birmingham, AL 35294-1260, USA. vollmer@uab.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Dec;16(4):693-6   [PMID:  21103950 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The diagnostic performance of multi-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography: a systematic re...
Next Document:  Anatomists and geometers: 16th samuel haughton lecture of the royal academy of medicine in ireland.