Document Detail

Staging and Defining Characteristics of Pressure Ulcers Using Photographs by Staff Nurses in Acute Care Settings.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23466719     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
PURPOSE:: The aim of this study was to determine if a digital photograph obtained by a staff nurse in the acute care setting could be used to determine staging and wound characteristics of a pressure ulcer when viewed by a panel of wound experts as compared to a bedside assessment by a wound expert. SUBJECTS AND SETTING:: One hundred digital photographs of pressure ulcers were obtained from 69 patients on general and critical care medical-surgical nursing units from 2 Magnet-designated hospitals belonging to a large Mid-Atlantic health care system. Four certified wound ostomy nurses (CWONs), 2 at each hospital site, identified patients with a pressure ulcer for bedside assessment and digital photography. METHODS:: This multisite nonexperimental study compared bedside assessment of wound characteristics and staging of 100 pressure ulcers by the hospital CWON to assessment of the same wound by an expert panel of 3 CWONs via digital photography. This study examined 13 wound characteristics and a total score on the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) as well as the staging of a pressure ulcer using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel definitions. A nonprobability sampling plan used a convenience sample of 69 adult inpatients at the 2 hospitals to obtain photographs of 100 pressure ulcers. INSTRUMENT:: The BWAT, formerly the Pressure Sore Status Tool, was used by the bedside and expert panelists to assess the pressure ulcer characteristics. This tool assesses 13 wound characteristics from best to worst, using a modified Likert scale. Studies examining reliability and validity of the BWAT support it as an effective instrument. RESULTS:: Interrater reliability among the hospital CWONs using bedside assessment and panelist CWONs using digital photography assessment for the BWAT 13 characteristics ranged from slight to fair agreement for skin color surrounding wound (κ range = 0.12-0.21, P ≤ .02) to fair to moderate agreement for necrotic tissue type (κ range = 0.37-0.60, P = .000). Only slight agreement for total BWAT score was found among on-site bedside CWONs and off-site expert panelist CWONs (κ range = 0.01-0.05, P ≤ .05). Results of the interrater analysis for staging of pressure ulcers had fair to moderate agreement (κ range = 0.39-0.58 (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS:: The findings of this study indicate that a digital photograph alone cannot reliably convey the characteristics of a pressure ulcer. A digital photo, in combination with clinical information, may increase the accuracy of the assessment and documentation. Systems designed to provide digital photography wound measurements may improve consistency, along with the development of standardized education for examining digital photographs by wound experts.
Elizabeth C Jesada; Joan I Warren; Dorothy Goodman; Ruth W Iliuta; Gail Thurkauf; Maureen K McLaughlin; Joyce E Johnson; Larry Strassner
Related Documents :
22890219 - Distribution of mean, systolic and diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in telemedical h...
6130109 - Abnormal beta-adrenergic responsiveness in allergic subjects. ii. the role of selective...
24358559 - A communication project to prevent pressure ulcers.
6340489 - Intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of pindolol. evidence for interaction with pretreatm...
1673579 - Vasodilation, not cardiodepression, underlies the antihypertensive effect of beta-adren...
2316229 - Prolonged labetalol infusion for management of severe hypertension and tachycardia in a...
25469969 - Field anesthesia machine ventilator oxygen consumption in models of high and low pulmon...
16497239 - Effects of systemic administration of 0.5% tropicamide on intraocular pressure, pupilla...
16077269 - Validation of semi-automatic device ua-704 for self-measurement of blood pressure.
Publication Detail:
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN     Volume:  40     ISSN:  1528-3976     ISO Abbreviation:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs     Publication Date:  2013 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-3-7     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9435679     Medline TA:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  150-156     Citation Subset:  -    
Elizabeth C. Jesada, MS, CRNP, CWON, Wound Ostomy Nurse Practitioner, Professional Practice and Research, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Joan I. Warren, PhD, RN-BC, NEA-BC, Director of Professional Practice and Research, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Dorothy Goodman, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Wound Ostomy Nurse, Nursing Quality/Nursing Administration, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. Ruth W. Iliuta, MS, RN, CNS-BC, CWON, Wound Ostomy Nurse, Professional Practice and Research, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Gail Thurkauf, MS, RN, Director of Nursing Quality, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. Maureen K. McLaughlin, PhD, RN, Director of Nursing Research, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. Joyce E. Johnson, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN, Senior Vice President and Chief Nursing Officer, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Larry Strassner, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, Vice President of Patient Care Services, Chief Nursing Officer, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Shape-dependent localized surface plasmon enhanced UV-emission from ZnO grown by atomic layer deposi...
Next Document:  Does incorporation of a clinical support template in the electronic medical record improve capture o...