Document Detail

Spring expansion is influenced by cranial biomechanics.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20485066     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
INTRODUCTION: Spring cranioplasty is used in selected cases of craniosynostosis. A rabbit model was used to determine (1) if cranial biomechanics modify the expected rate of spring expansion, (2) the residual spring force in situ after cranial expansion, and (3) if the spring weakens during clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 3 groups: the treatment group that underwent posterior frontal suturectomy and spring expansion (n = 15) and the control (n = 6) and sham groups (n = 6) that underwent suturectomy and incision only, respectively. Cephalography measured cranial expansion for 7 weeks. Spring force-deflection curves were measured in a dynamometer before and after use. RESULTS: Significant cranial expansion was observed for 8 hours (15% of the total expansion). The rate of expansion decreased significantly between 48 and 96 hours followed by a second period of rapid expansion from 96 hours to 7 days (P = 0.001). Approximately 80% of expansion was achieved by 2 weeks and 90% by 3 weeks. Initial spring force was 9.4 N (range, 7.2-10.7). Once the spring had achieved 90% of its eventual expansion, it retained 40% of its original force. At the completion of cranial expansion, the residual spring force was 2.6 N (range, 1.4-4.0) or 28% of the original spring force. All springs maintained identical load-compression curves after use. CONCLUSIONS: The craniofacial structures are mechanically complex and modify the uniform expansion curve expected as the spring force decays. Significant force is maintained within the spring at the completion of cranial expansion. This may have implications for possible relapse if the springs are removed early.
Charles Davis; Per Windh; Claes G K Lauritzen
Related Documents :
24701726 - Clinical characteristics and mortality in systemic sclerosis: a comparison between earl...
18971736 - Roman arch, keystone fixation for facial bipartition with monobloc distraction.
16462336 - Sagittal craniosynostosis: surgical outcomes and long-term growth.
16769496 - Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of p...
24856926 - Piezoelectric osteoarthrectomy for management of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint.
15370406 - Ultrasound imaging demonstration of the improvement of non-ablative laser remodeling by...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of craniofacial surgery     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1536-3732     ISO Abbreviation:  J Craniofac Surg     Publication Date:  2010 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-20     Completed Date:  2010-09-16     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9010410     Medline TA:  J Craniofac Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  843-6     Citation Subset:  D    
Central & Southern New Zealand Craniofacial Program, Wellington, New Zealand.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Cranial Sutures / physiopathology,  surgery*
Craniosynostoses / physiopathology,  surgery*
Craniotomy / instrumentation*,  methods*
Disease Models, Animal
Random Allocation
Time Factors

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Lower lip reconstruction with neck flaps as a salvage procedure.
Next Document:  Comparison of the Supporting Strength of a Poly-l-Lactic Acid Sheet and Porous Polyethylene (Medpor)...