Document Detail


Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10490553     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and the factors influencing its indications in hospitals with the facilities to perform this treatment. DESIGN: Data from the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) trial were analysed, concerning the effects of the decisions of individual hospitals, the time of admission of patients, and the effects of patient characteristics on the selection of reperfusion treatment. PATIENTS: Between June 1994 and January 1997 eight hospitals treated 1532 patients with acute myocardial infarction. 418 (27.3%) were treated conservatively, 641 (41.8%) were treated using intravenous thrombolysis, 387 (25.3%) were treated using primary angioplasty, and 86 (5.6%) received a combination of thrombolysis and angioplasty. RESULTS: The proportion of patients treated with primary angioplasty varied from 1.8% to 57.7% among the eight hospitals. The use of primary angioplasty during non-office hours also showed wide variation, ranging from 20% to 54% between centres. The use of thrombolysis was comparatively evenly distributed during the non-office hours, ranging from 50-69%. Four hospitals with a primary angioplasty use rate > 30% showed no difference in the proportion of patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, high risk patients, or a combination of both, when compared with four hospitals with a lower rate of primary angioplasty use (98/322 (30.4%) v 19/65 (29. 2%), respectively, p = 0.847). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitals with the facilities for performing primary angioplasty the most important factors influencing its use were the discretion of the individual hospital and the time of patient admission. Characteristics of patients did not influence the choice of reperfusion treatment
Authors:
R Zahn; R Schiele; K Seidl; K E Hauptmann; T Voigtländer; H J Rupprecht; M Gottwik; H G Glunz; J Senges
Related Documents :
1973073 - Coronary angioplasty for medically refractory unstable angina in patients with prior co...
8829833 - Early restenosis following percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for the treatm...
6723693 - Tachycardia caused by an accessory nodoventricular tract: a clinico-pathologic correlat...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Heart (British Cardiac Society)     Volume:  82     ISSN:  1468-201X     ISO Abbreviation:  Heart     Publication Date:  1999 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-11-05     Completed Date:  1999-11-05     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9602087     Medline TA:  Heart     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  420-5     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Department of Cardiology, Bremserstrabetae 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary / utilization*
Coronary Care Units
Germany
Hospitalization
Hospitals, General
Hospitals, University
Humans
Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy,  therapy*
Patient Selection*
Prospective Studies
Thrombolytic Therapy / contraindications,  utilization
Time Factors
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Heart. 1999 Oct;82(4):402-3   [PMID:  10490544 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Hospital transfer for primary coronary angioplasty in high risk patients with acute myocardial infar...
Next Document:  Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients wi...