Document Detail

Spatial clusters of suicide in the municipality of São Paulo 1996-2005: an ecological study.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22913796     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: In a classical study, Durkheim mapped suicide rates, wealth, and low family density and realized that they clustered in northern France. Assessing others variables, such as religious society, he constructed a framework for the analysis of the suicide, which still allows international comparisons using the same basic methodology. The present study aims to identify possible significantly clusters of suicide in the city of São Paulo, and then, verify their statistical associations with socio-economic and cultural characteristics.
METHODS: A spatial scan statistical test was performed to analyze the geographical pattern of suicide deaths of residents in the city of São Paulo by Administrative District, from 1996 to 2005. Relative risks and high and/or low clusters were calculated accounting for gender and age as co-variates, were analyzed using spatial scan statistics to identify geographical patterns. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations with socioeconomic variables, considering, the spatial cluster of high suicide rates as the response variable. Drawing from Durkheim's original work, current World Health Organization (WHO) reports and recent reviews, the following independent variables were considered: marital status, income, education, religion, and migration.
RESULTS: The mean suicide rate was 4.1/100,000 inhabitant-years. Against this baseline, two clusters were identified: the first, of increased risk (RR=1.66), comprising 18 districts in the central region; the second, of decreased risk (RR=0.78), including 14 districts in the southern region. The downtown area toward the southwestern region of the city displayed the highest risk for suicide, and though the overall risk may be considered low, the rate climbs up to an intermediate level in this region. One logistic regression analysis contrasted the risk cluster (18 districts) against the other remaining 78 districts, testing the effects of socioeconomic-cultural variables. The following categories of proportion of persons within the clusters were identified as risk factors: singles (OR=2.36), migrants (OR=1.50), Catholics (OR=1.37) and higher income (OR=1.06). In a second logistic model, likewise conceived, the following categories of proportion of persons were identified as protective factors: married (OR=0.49) and Evangelical (OR=0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: This risk/ protection profile is in accordance with the interpretation that, as a social phenomenon, suicide is related to social isolation. Thus, the classical framework put forward by Durkheim seems to still hold, even though its categorical expression requires re-interpretation.
Daniel H Bando; Rafael S Moreira; Julio C R Pereira; Ligia V Barrozo
Related Documents :
20574636 - Feasibility and effectiveness of hiv prevention among wives of heavy drinkers in bangal...
9690366 - Impact of socioeconomic status on survival with aids.
20350816 - A critical review of hiv-related interventions for women prisoners in the united states.
12512846 - Evaluation of an hiv/aids prevention intervention targeting latino gay men and men who ...
8955986 - Three-year coronal caries incidence and risk factors in north carolina elderly.
11889066 - Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-08-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMC psychiatry     Volume:  12     ISSN:  1471-244X     ISO Abbreviation:  BMC Psychiatry     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-11-15     Completed Date:  2013-04-02     Revised Date:  2013-07-12    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100968559     Medline TA:  BMC Psychiatry     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  124     Citation Subset:  IM    
University Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Age Factors
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Suicide / statistics & numerical data*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Psychiatry
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright ©2012 Bando et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 3 Month: 10 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 16 Month: 8 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 23 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Volume: 12First Page: 124 Last Page: 124
PubMed Id: 22913796
ID: 3496688
Publisher Id: 1471-244X-12-124
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-124

Spatial clusters of suicide in the municipality of São Paulo 1996–2005: an ecological study
Daniel H Bando1 Email:
Rafael S Moreira2 Email:
Julio CR Pereira3 Email:
Ligia V Barrozo4 Email:
1University Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
2Department of Public Health, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Recife, Brazil
3Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
4Department of Geography, School of Philosophy, Literature and Human Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil


Suicide is a major problem in public health: among people aged 15–44 years, it is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide [1]. According to the World Health Organization [2] the global suicide rate has been increasing since 1950. Estimates for 2020 based on current trends indicate that approximately 1.53 million people will commit suicide and 10–20 times more people will attempt suicide worldwide [3]. The emotional impact on families and friends affected by suicides or by attempted suicides can last many years.

Suicide trends are on the rise among the world’s emerging economies. In Brazil, annual suicide rates rose from 4.4 to 5.7 per 100,000 between 1980 and 2006 [4]. Nevertheless, there are significant differences among Brazilian regions, not only in figures but also in trends, as shown by Brzozowski [5] in a recent study covering the 26 Brazilian states. In the state of São Paulo, rates are lower and/or levelling off, which warrants monitoring because changes in social formation are likely to change suicide profile as well.

Since the end of the nineteenth century, it has been understood that suicide presents geographic and temporal variations [6,7]. In 1897, Durkheim constructed a framework for the analysis of the suicide, which still allows international comparisons amongst recent studies using the same basic methodology. He mapped suicide rates and realized that they clustered in geographic space. He also mapped alcoholism, the size of families and wealth, which overlapped the suicide rates map in northern France. In fact, a recent study using the same suicide data and geographical information system (GIS) techniques found a spatial cluster of high suicide rates in the north [8].

Durkheim's theory is based on two concepts: social integration and social regulation. Suicidal behaviour is common in societies where there is a low degree of social integration (egoistic suicide). The individual is protected from egoism by religions with strong group ties (e.g. Catholic Church) and family ties (e.g. married people). Suicidal behaviour is also common in societies where there is a low degree of social regulation (anomic suicide). Social regulation can be understood as external regulatory forces on the individual (economic cycles, income level) [7,9]. When Durkheim claimed that "poverty protects against suicide," he based on French departments and European countries observations. He noted higher suicide rates in wealthy regions. This finding raised the hypothesis that economic development could be related to individualism and, ergo, to social isolation and suicide. The other extremes of egoistic suicide and anomic suicide (altruistic suicide and fatalistic suicide, respectively) are also related to high rates of voluntary deaths, but were not generally applicable to modern western society [7,10]. As in modern society, integration rarely reaches excessive levels [9], weak social integration is more likely to affect the geographical patterning of suicide [8].

The geography of suicide is still poorly understood, with few studies that used maps to explore and represent the geographical variability and patterning of suicide [11]. In England and Wales, two main geographic patterns in young men (from 15–44 years old) were found [12]: a ‘bull’s-eye’ pattern, with highest suicide rates in the city centres of all ten of Britain’s largest cities and declined with increasing distance from the city centre and, a high rate of suicide in coastal areas. Otherwise, in non-Western nations as Taiwan, rates were highest in a mountainous rural area, with no evidence of above average rates in large cities [13].

Despite Durkheim’s findings, the relationship between socioeconomic characteristics and suicide is not straightforward. In France, Germany, Italy and England, for instance, different patterns have been observed since the early past century [14]. Today, it is known that the relationship between suicide and wealth is more complex. In developed and wealth countries (e.g., United States, Great Britain, Japan, France), suicide occurs more frequently in poor areas. Suicide trends in these countries are also either decreasing or stable [15]. These findings are evidence that the distribution of suicide has been changing along space and time.

The risk factors at individual level can be grouped in: a) distal factors - as genetic loading, personality characteristics, restricted fetal growth and perinatal circumstances, early traumatic life events, neurobiological disturbances and, b) proximal factors - as psychiatric and physical disorders, psychosocial crisis, availability of means and exposure to models [16]. However, at the contextual level there is no consensus yet to support the association between suicide and socio-economic characteristics of geographic areas [17]. Some studies report a direct relationship between suicide and income [18], while others observe this contrariwise [19] or yet fail to detect any association at all [20].

According to Susser [21] contextual characteristics are fundamental to understand how context affects the health of persons and groups since measures of individual attributes cannot detect the processes involved in relations as selection, distribution, interaction, adaptation, and other responses. This lay stress on ecological studies which, though not best fit to aetiological studies, do suit most properly studies with broader approaches. Suicide is an avoidable cause of death, which varies according to the socio-economic and cultural context of each society. Thus, understanding the relations among these phenomena is essential to define approaches that promote its occurrence reduction.

The Synthesis of Social Indicators of 2002 published by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [22] states that one of the most remarkable characteristic of Brazilian society is social inequality. This can be observed in the city of São Paulo. According to the map of social exclusion/inclusion of the city, the districts of worse living conditions are in the outskirts, in contrast with well-off districts in the downtown area [23]. São Paulo is one of the most populous cities of the world; the last National Census estimated the population as 10.8 million inhabitants, with an elevated degree of urbanization [24]. The city of São Paulo is the major financial and economic center of Brazil. Although the São Paulo Metropolitan Region (38 surrounding municipalities) has the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) corresponding to 16.7% of total Brazilian GDP [25], 83.5% of the inhabitants have living conditions below a desirable standard, with low income, poor access to education, sanitation and housing [23].

From 1996 to 2005, 4,275 suicide deaths occurred in the city of São Paulo, with a mean suicide rate of 4.1/100,000 inhabitant-year. Revisiting the seminal ideia of Dukrheim's study, the present study aims to seek spatial patterns in the distribution of suicide rates, and then, verify its possible associations with socio-economic and cultural characteristics. Results should hopefully contribute to the better understanding of this phenomenon and thus advise prevention programs.


An ecological study was conceived using the 96 Administrative Districts that comprise the whole municipality as the analysis unities. The first stage consisted of an exploratory spatial analysis of all suicide deaths of residents in the municipality of São Paulo, occurred from 1996 to 2005. We chose the data from 1996 onwards to avoid bias, since during this period the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Deaths (ICD-10) was implemented. Mortality data were obtained from the Death Records Improvement Program (Programa de Aprimoramento de Informação de Mortalidade - PROAIM), the official health statistics source for the municipality. Suicide deaths corresponded to “intentional self harm”, codes X60 to X84, according to the ICD-10. The population estimates for each district were calculated by year by the São Paulo State System for Data Analysis Foundation (SEADE). Mortality and population data are publicly available and aggregated by Administrative District.

To elicit the putative spatial pattern of the suicide in the municipality, relative risks per administrative unit were calculated and mapped. As the suicide incidence is higher amongst males in the young and old age groups, relative risks were calculated accounting for the respective co-variates gender and age with the use of the software SaTScan [26]. A spatial scan statistical test was also performed through SaTScan to identify possible significantly high and/or low clusters of suicide. The hypothesis tested was of no departures from expected values in a bicaudal test using the Poisson distribution. The spatial scan statistics arranges a circular window of variable size in the map surface and allows its center to move in such a way that, for a given position and size, the window includes a different set of near neighbors. If the window includes a neighbor centroid, the whole district area is considered included. Statistical significance of a given cluster was ascertained by a likelihood ratio test using Monte Carlo procedures. The null-hypothesis was rejected when p <0.05 for the most likely cluster and p <0.02, for the secondary clusters.

The second step of the analysis consisted in verifying possible associations between the suicide risk clusters and socio-economic and cultural variables through logistic regression. The dependent logit variable contrasted risk cluster districts against the remaining non-risk cluster districts. The choice of independent variables to be scrutinised hinged on both Durkheim’s originals and the risk factors for suicide highlighted by WHO [1], PAHO/WHO et al. [27] and other reviews [17,28,29]. These data were obtained from a National Census of 2000 database as the following:

· Marital status, which comprised three categories: single, separated and married.

· Income: monthly average income per household (measured in number of minimum wages, Brazilian Real – R$).

· Migration and recent migration: people who lived in other municipality and people living in São Paulo less than five years.

· Religion: none, Catholic, Evangelical, Spiritualist.

Income is strongly correlated with education (Pearson Correlation was: +0.744; p-value < 0.01). So, we decided to use the average income, because it is one of the most common socioeconomic indicators used in this study design and allows comparisons with other studies. Each of these variables was at first analysed through simple logistic regression to ascertain significance as well as to discriminate categories related to risk from those related to protection. Provided that at least a 20% level of significance was achieved, these variables were considered for one of two multiple logistic regressions: one concerning risk factors and another concerning protective factors. A 5% significance level was established, and Hosmer and Lemeshow test was used to check model adjustment. Statistical analyses were performed through SPSS.


Two significant spatial clusters were identified. One cluster classified as high risk presented 6.3 suicides per 100,000 inhabitants with relative risk of 1.66. This cluster is located downtown, the south-central and western-central area of the city and includes 18 Administrative Districts. A secondary cluster classified as low risk was also identified with 3.3 suicides per 100,000 inhabitants and a relative risk of 0.78 (Figure 1).

The multiple regression analysis assessed effects of both risk and protective factors as shown in the Tables 1 and 2. Both models achieved a high level adjustment in the Hosmer and Lemeshow test with p = 0.991 and p = 1.000 respectively.

As shown in Table  2, one must consider the nature of the variables to properly compare their effects. Income, though it displayed the least OR values, does have a considerable impact on the likelihood of its association with high suicide risk clusters. Income values ranged from 1.2 to 100.3 times the minimum wage with a mean of 24.4 and a standard deviation of 19.95. Thus, an income increase of as little as five, or approximately ¼ of the variation pattern, raised the OR figures from 1.056 to 1.28. In other words, a very modest increase of one minimal wage level in income increased the chances of suicide in a high-risk cluster by 5.6%, and an increase of five minimal wages levels increased the chances by 31%.


The discovery of a significant suicide risk cluster represents an important point for further investigating the risk factors for suicide. In the case of the city of São Paulo, statistical analysis revealed that the relative risk of suicide is higher in the downtown, south-central and western-central areas of the city. Although the average rate for the entire city may be considered low (< 5.0 per 100,000 inhabitants) according to Diekstra and Gulbinat [30], locally, the very downtown area of the city presented a rate of 6.3 per 100,000 inhabitants, a medium rate in this classification. This discovery warrants enhanced attention for public health action in these areas. It is important to mention that in the cluster detection procedure with a circular window in large areas with spatial variations in the population density, the resulting clusters can include districts with lower risk. Despite this limitation, in a recent review of software for space-time disease surveillance, SaTScan was highlighted as the most developed and robust software for cluster detection [31].

Multiple logistic regressions pointed out that marital status plays an important role in suicide; even though estimates present wide confidence intervals, the results suggest that being single more than double the likelihood (OR = 2.36) in high suicide risk clusters whereas being married almost halves such risk (OR = 0.49). Durkheim was one of the first to observe that high suicide rates were associated with being single in France, and his theory could be used to explain this association in São Paulo. According to Durkheim’s theory, suicide varies inversely with the degree of integration of the individual to his social group. The spatial distribution of the proportion of singles (41.06%) and separated (18.61%) in the central region of the city of São Paulo is greater than the whole city (38.91% and 12.91%, respectively), which could lead one to interpret these suicides as similar to ‘selfish suicides’ in Durkheim’s work. Recent study based on suicidal individuals from São Paulo, from 1996–2008, confirmed that being single is significant as risk factor for suicide [32].

In a review of 84 papers from 1981 to 1995, Stack [28] concluded that more than three quarters of the studies supported the protective factor of being married. This was in agreement with his previous analysis of 15 nations (mostly European) in which he found that marriage lowered suicides for both males and females [33]. A study of 12 developed countries with data from the end of the twentieth century, including the United States, Australia and European countries, identified marriage as suicide protective factor [34]. The same effect was observed in Italy with data from 2000 to 2002 [35].

Data from Unites States between 1986 and 2002 showed that larger families were associated with lower suicide rates whereas divorced or separated, widowed, or never married individuals conditions were associated with higher suicide rates though only among men [36]. In Northern Ireland, from 1996 to 2005, marriage was found to protect both genders against suicide [37]. Another study verified protection only for married men in Austria using data from 1970 to 2001 [38]. A study with recent Taiwan data observed that never married males had the highest suicide rates [39]. Divorce was also related to suicides in Japan [40], Taiwan [41], Australia [42] and Romania [43].

The migrant condition was found to increase the likelihood in high suicide risk clusters in almost 50% (OR = 1.50) of São Paulo. The WHO’s “Self-directed violence” report [1] alerts that suicide rates in a given migrant group have been found to be similar to that of the migrant’s country-of-birth. Indeed, Voracek et al. [44] retrieved a meta-analysis of 33 studies with data from seven host countries, and a strong and direct association was found between immigrant rates and country-of-birth rates. The city of São Paulo still attracts a great number of migrants from all Brazilian regions [25] whereas migration from other countries is also rising. In the downtown area, in the high suicide risk region of the city, migrants correspond to 79.8% of residents in contrast with only 13.2% of migrants in the city as a whole. Unfortunately, no information regarding the migrants’ origins is available to provide a control for this association. Whether this is due to imported patterns or to locally developed behaviours, the migrant condition may be a flag for suicide risk, which should at least invite health surveillance.

The Catholic condition was found to increase the likelihood in high suicide risk clusters in 37% (OR = 1.37). Though at first this seems to conflict with Durkheim’s original finding that Protestants were more prone to suicide, one must understand that he attributed this finding to Protestants’ being less socially integrated. In São Paulo, the Catholic group is known to be less socially cohesive than Evangelical groups [45] and thus may be susceptible to a higher suicide risk. In recent decades, the national census has shown a decrease in the number of Catholics in São Paulo (78.9 to 67.1%) and an increase of Evangelicals (8.54 to 16.4%) [45,46]. Evangelicals have greater popular appeal. The number of Evangelical churches is three times the Catholic, in poor areas of the outskirts. Among the Evangelicals, there are several social networks that reduce their vulnerabilities [45], thereby decreasing the suicide rates. Nevertheless, Prandi et al. [47] showed a relationship between Evangelicals and poverty and found that the geographic distribution of these two variables was concentrated in the periphery of the city. In the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, a recent ecological study found that being Evangelical is a protective factor for suicide [48].

Neither income itself nor its putative interaction with religion achieved statistical significance in multiple logistic regression (Table  2); therefore, only the crude protective effect of being Evangelical against suicide risk was detected. Regarding the results in Tables 1 and 2, it may be possible to reconcile the observations found in the present study and in the one by Prandi et al. [45,47]. The lower the income or the higher the proportion of Evangelicals, the less the risk (Table  2).

In the present study, the chances of a high suicide risk cluster increased by 5.6% with each increase of one minimal wage level in income. In northern India, from 1996–2005, income was inversely related to suicide [49]. Another study using World Health Organization (WHO) data focused on countries with a medium Human Development Index (HDI) and found that education and telephone density were directly related to suicide while a high Gini index was inversely related to suicide [29]. Other recent ecological studies performed in the United States [50], Japan [51], Australia [52], Northern England [53], Finland [54,55] and Tuscany (Italy) [56] identified an inverse relationship between income and suicide. Another study carried out in Italy suggested that regions with higher economic status have the highest suicide rates [57]. Nevertheless, the relationship between suicide and wealth is far more complex because it relates to multiple socio-economic factors resulting from numerous historical and cultural elements inherent in each population. Accordingly, there are multiple divergent findings in the literature regarding the direction of this association (e.g., direct, inverse or no relation) between wealth and suicide. The manual of suicide prevention by PAHO/WHO et al. [27] considers the extremes of economic strata as suicide risk factors. Many factors can contribute to this wide variation of findings including the size of the aggregated population, metrics of socio-economic characteristics and the inclusion of different potentially confounding variables, study designs, secular trends, and cultural aspects [17].

The present study has some limitations. The first is inherent to the ecological study design. The association observed between variables at the group level does not necessarily represent the association that exists at the individual level. This bias is known as ecological fallacy. Other limitation is related to data collection due to misclassification of suicide. Different procedures and cultural and social practices and values probably have various effects on death records and lead to misclassification of suicide [1,16]. Among those is the fact that health insurance does not cover health expenses when injury or death is resulted of suicide attempt, which can lead to underestimation.

The results herein presented are in agreement with Durkheim’s original suggestion that poverty had a protective effect against suicide [17]. This could suggest that economic development leads to individualism that, in turn, leads to higher suicide rates [15]. Thus, to better understand the role of wealth, one should seek a better understanding of poverty as suggested by Paugam [58], whose work was based on Castel’s [59] work distinguishing between disqualifying poverty and integrated poverty. The latter, which best suits São Paulo, is found in societies where low life standards are compensated by a solidarity response within family, neighbourhood, and region.


The present study used an ecological approach similar to that utilized by Durkheim. Criticisms applicable to his study are likewise applicable to the present study. None of the covariates of suicide herein presented can or should be interpreted as causes in the natural history of the phenomenon of suicide. Indeed, suicide may not be a condition of which one should seek etiopathological paths. Medicine is concerned with individuals, whereas public health is focused on collections of individuals. The present study has identified clusters of high suicide risk as well as their correlates, and this should assist in the planning, intervention, monitoring and evaluation of the phenomenon of suicide.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the study: DHB and LVB. DHB and LVB undertook the spatial scan statistic and DHB and RSM, the statistical analysis. DHB drafted an initial manuscript. DHB, LVB and JCRP contributed to writing the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


This work was supported by the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

We thank the reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.

World Health OrganizationWorld report on violence and healthSelf-directed violenceYear: 2002Geneva
World Health OrganizationSuicide Prevention (SUPRE)Year: 2002Geneva http://www.who. int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/.
Bertolote JM,Fleischmann A,A global perspective in the epidemiology of suicideSuicidologiYear: 2002768
Lovisi GM,Santos SA,Legay L,Abelha L,Valencia E,Epidemiological analysis of suicide in Brazil from 1980 to 2006Rev Bras PsiquiatrYear: 2009318694
Brzozowski FS,Soares GB,Benedet J,Boing AF,Peres MA,Suicide time trends in Brazil from 1980 to 2005Cad Saude PublicaYear: 2010261293130210.1590/S0102-311X201000070000820694355
Morselli EA,Suicide: an essay on comparative moral statisticsYear: 1882New York: Appleton
Durkheim E,SuicideYear: 1897London: Routledge 1951.
Baller RD,Richardson KK,Social integration, imitation, and the geographic patterning of suicideAm Sociol RevYear: 20026787388810.2307/3088974
Lester D,Charles C Thomas,Suicide from a sociological perspectiveYear: 1989Springfield: Charles C Thomas
Iga M,The Thorn in the Chrysanthemum: Suicide and Economic Success in Modern JapanYear: 1986Los Angeles: University of California Press
Middleton N,Sterne JAC,Gunnell DJ,An atlas of suicide mortality: England and Wales, 1988–1994Health PlaceYear: 20081449250610.1016/j.healthplace.2007.09.00718023602
Gunnel D,Wheeler B,Chang S-S,Thomas B,Sterne JAC,Dorling D,Changes in the geography of suicide in young men: England and Wales 1981–2005J Epidemiol Community HealthYear: 20126653654310.1136/jech.2009.10400021131304
Chang S-S,Sterne JAC,Wheeler BW,Lu T-H,Lin J-J,Gunnell D,Geography of suicide in Taiwan: spatial patterning and socioeconomic correlatesHealth PlaceYear: 20111764165010.1016/j.healthplace.2011.01.00321292534
Halbwachs M,The causes of suicideYear: 1978New York: Free Press
Baudelot C,Establet R,Suicide: The hidden side of modernityYear: 2008Cambridge: Polity Press
Hawton K,van Heeringen K,SuicideLancetYear: 200937396721372138110.1016/S0140-6736(09)60372-X19376453
Rehkopf DH,Buka SL,The association between suicide and the socio-economic characteristics of geographical areas: a systematic reviewPsychol MedYear: 20063614515716420711
Melinder KA,Andersson R,The impact of structural factors on the injury rate in different European countriesEur J Public HealthYear: 20011130130810.1093/eurpub/11.3.30111582611
Gunnell DJ,Peters TJ,Kammerling RM,Brooks J,Relation between parasuicide, suicide, psychiatric admissions, and socioeconomic deprivationBr Med JYear: 199531122623010.1136/bmj.311.6999.2267627035
Cubbin C,LeClere FB,Smith GS,Socioeconomic status and the occurrence of fatal and non fatal injury in the United StatesAm J Public HealthYear: 200090707710630140
Susser M,The logic in ecological: I The logic of analysisAm J Public HealthYear: 19948482582910.2105/AJPH.84.5.8258179056
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e EstatísticaSíntese de indicadores sociais confirma as desigualdades da sociedade brasileiraYear: 2002
Sposati A,Mapa de exclusão/inclusão social na cidade de São Paulo – Brasil - 2000Year: 2000São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística)Brasil tem 183,9 milhões de habitantes segundo Contagem da População do IBGEYear: 2007
Viana MC,Teixeira MG,Beraldi F,Bassani IS,Andrade LH,São Paulo Megacity Mental Health Survey - a population-based epidemiological study of psychiatric morbidity in the São Paulo metropolitan area: aims, design and field implementationRev Bras PsiquiatrYear: 20093137538610.1590/S1516-4446200900040001620098829
Kulldorff M,Information Management Services Inc: SaTScanTM v7.0: Software for the spatial and space-time scan statisticsYear: 2007
Pan American Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization, Ministério da Saúde do Brasil, Universidade Estadual de Campinas: Prevenção do suicídio: Manual dirigido a profissionais das equipes de saúde mentalYear: 2006Brasília: Ministério da Saúde
Stack S,Suicide: a 15-year review of the sociological literature Part II: modernization and social integration perspectives.Suicide Life Threat BehavYear: 20003016317610888056
Vijayakumar L,Nagaraj K,Pirkis J,Whiteford H,Suicide in developing countries (1): frequency, distribution, and association with socioeconomic indicatorsCrisisYear: 20052610411110.1027/0227-5910.26.3.10416276752
Diekstra RFW,Gulbinat W,The epidemiology of suicidal behaviour: a review of three continentsWorld Health Stat QYear: 19934652687694430
Jackson MC,Huang L,Luo J,Hachey M,Feuer E,Comparison of tests for spatial heterogeneity on data with global clustering patterns and outliersInt J Health GeogrYear: 200985510.1186/1476-072X-8-5519822013
Bando DH,Brunoni AR,Fernandes TG,Benseñor IM,Lotufo PA,Suicide rates and trends in São Paulo, Brazil according to gender, age and demographic aspects: a joinpoint regression analysisRev Bras PsiquiatrYear: 201234237244
Stack S,Gender, marriage, and suicide acceptability: a comparative approachSex RolesYear: 19983850152010.1023/A:1018770124576
Cutright P,Stack S,Fernquist R,Marital status integration, suicide disapproval, and societal integration as explanations of marital status differences in female age-specific suicide ratesSuicide Life Threat BehavYear: 20073771572410.1521/suli.2007.37.6.71518275377
Masocco M,Pompili M,Vichi M,Vanacore N,Lester D,Tatarelli R,Suicide and marital status in ItalyPsychiatr QYear: 20087927528510.1007/s11126-008-9072-418600458
Denney JT,Rogers RG,Krueger PM,Wadsworth T,Adult suicide mortality in the United States: marital status, family size, socioeconomic status, and differences by sexSoc Sci QYear: 2009901167118510.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00652.x20161640
Corcoran P,Nagar A,Suicide and marital status in Northern IrelandSoc Psychiatry Psychiatr EpidemiolYear: 20104579580010.1007/s00127-009-0120-719763365
Kapusta ND,Gernot S,Suicides of men in Austria: an epidemiological analysis over a 30-year periodJ Of Men’s HealthYear: 20041197202
Liu HL,Epidemiologic characteristics and trends of fatal suicides among the elderly in TaiwanSuicide Life Threat BehavYear: 20093910311310.1521/suli.2009.39.1.10319298155
Yamasaki A,Araki S,Sakai R,Yokoyama K,Voorhees AS,Suicide mortality of young, middle-aged and elderly males and females in Japan for the years 1953–96: time series analysis for the effects of unemployment, female labour force, young and aged population, primary industry and population densityInd HealthYear: 20084654154910.2486/indhealth.46.54119088406
Yeh JY,Xirasagar S,Liu TC,Li CY,Lin HC,Does marital status predict the odds of suicidal death in Taiwan? A seven-year population-based studySuicide Life Threat BehavYear: 20083830231010.1521/suli.2008.38.3.30218611128
Wyder M,Ward P,De Leo D,Separation as a suicide risk factorJ Affect DisordYear: 200911620821310.1016/j.jad.2008.11.00719128839
Jung H,Matei DB,Hecser L,Biostatistical study of suicide features in Mures County (Romania)Leg MedYear: 200911S95S97
Voracek M,Loibl LM,Dervic K,Kapusta ND,Niederkrotenthaler T,Sonneck G,Consistency of immigrant suicide rates in Austria with country-of-birth suicide rates: a role for genetic risk factors for suicide?Psychiatry ResYear: 200917028628910.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.03219900719
Almeida R,Religião na metrópole paulistaBraz J CiencSociaisYear: 2004561527
Camurça PA,Teixeira F, Menezes RA realidade das religiões no Brasil no Censo do IBGE-2000As religiões no BrasilPetrópolis: Vozes
Prandi R,Góes RCT,Justo JA,Prandi RA renovação carismática e o pentecostalismo: proximidade e diferençaYear: 1998São Paulo: Edusp123142
Bezerra Filho JG,Werneck GL,Almeida RLF,Oliveira MIV,Magalhães FB,Socio-demographic determinants of suicide in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1998–2002Cad Saude PublicaYear: 20122883384410.1590/S0102-311X201200050000322641507
Sharma BR,Gupta AK,Sharma S,Gupta N,Relhan N,Singh H,Suicides in Northern India: comparison of trends and review of literatureJ Forensic Leg MedYear: 20071431832610.1016/j.jcfm.2006.08.00917112767
Tondo L,Albert MJ,Baldessarini RJ,Suicide rates in relation to health care access in the United States: an ecological studyJ Clin PsychiatryYear: 20066751752310.4088/JCP.v67n040216669716
Fukuda Y,Nakamura K,Takano T,Cause-specific mortality differences across socioeconomic position of municipalities in Japan, 1973–1977 and 1993–1998: increased importance of injury and suicide in inequality for ages under 75Int J EpidemiolYear: 20053410010915561754
Taylor R,Page A,Morrell S,Harrison J,Carter G,Mental health and socio-economic variations in Australian suicideSoc Sci &MedYear: 2005611551155910.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.00916005786
Rezaeian M,Dunn G,Leger SS,Appleby L,Ecological association between suicide rates and indices of deprivation in the north west region of England: the importance of the size of the administrative unitJ Epidemiol Community HealthYear: 20066095696110.1136/jech.2005.04310917053284
Maki NE,Martikainen PT,Socioeconomic differences in suicide mortality by sex in Finland in 1971–2000: a register-based study of trends, levels, and life expectancy differencesScand J Public HealthYear: 20073538739510.1080/1403494070121961817786802
Maki N,Martikainen PT,The role of socioeconomic indicators on non-alcohol and alcohol-associated suicide mortality among women in Finland. A register-based follow-up study of 12 million person-yearsSoc Sciand MedYear: 2009682161216910.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.006
Martiello MA,Giacchi MV,Ecological study of isolation and suicide in Tuscany (Italy)Psychiatry ResYear: 2012 in press.
Pompili M,Innamorati M,Vichi M,Masocco M,Vanacore N,Lester D,Serafini G,Tatarelli R,De Leo D,Girardi P,Inequalities and impact of socioeconomic-cultural factors in suicide rates across ItalyCrisisYear: 20113217818510.1027/0227-5910/a00008421940252
Paugam S,Desqualificação social – ensaio sobre a nova pobrezaYear: 2003São Paulo: Educ & Cortez
Castel R,Metamorfoses da questão socialYear: 1998Rio de Janeiro: Vozes


[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Suicide spatial clusters of increased and decreased risk in the city of São Paulo, from 1996 to 2005. Districts: API: Alto de Pinheiros, BFU: Barra Funda, BVI: Bela Vista, BRE: Bom Retiro, BRS: Bras, CDU: Cidade Dutra, CMB: Cambuci, CGR: Campo Grande, CLM: Campo Limpo, CRE: Capão Redondo, CAD: Cidade Ademar, CON: Consolação, GRA: Grajau, IBI: Itaim Bibi, JDA: Jardim Angela, JDP: Jardim Paulista, JDS: Jardim São Luis, LIB: Liberdade, MOE: Moema, MOR: Morumbi, PDR: Pedreira, PRD: Perdizes, PIN: Pinheiros, RTA: Raposo Tavares, REP: Republica, SCE: Santa Cecilia, SAM: Santo Amaro, SEE: Se, SOC: Socorro, VAN: Vila Andrade, VMN: Vila Mariana, VSO: Vila Sonia.

[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Multiple logistic regression measuring effects of risk factors to High Risk Suicide cluster

Variable β p OR 95% CI
Marital status
1.081 – 5.150
All others
1.156 – 1.937
1.024 – 1.823
All others
Income (n° of minimal wages) 0.054 0.026 1.056 1.007 – 1.107

[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Multiple logistic regression measuring effects of protective factors to High Risk Suicide cluster

Variable β p OR CI 95%
Marital status
0.302 – 0.786
All others
0.404 – 0.899
All others     1  

Article Categories:
  • Research Article

Previous Document:  Continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with liver fail...
Next Document:  Evaluation of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness of Myopic and Hyperopic Patients: A ...