| Some ethical aspects of xenotransplantation in light of the proposed European directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20692423 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Unlike what has happened in other times, society in general and especially the scientific community has become aware that animals share our sensitivity to pain and the capacity to suffer. In this regard, it is generally accepted that animals must be protected from all types of abuse. In fact, it is unavoidable today that animals used in scientific experiments enjoy the maximum degree of protection and well-being. This view is based on an ecocentric notion of living matter as opposed to the traditional anthropocentric approach because it has become evident that ethics should not be limited to those belonging to the same species. Likewise, there is a broad consensus-with the exception of members of certain animal protection groups-regarding the need to experiment with animals, when no alternative methods (AM) are available, given that the current state of scientific knowledge still does not allow for this type of experimentation to be entirely abolished. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that not every scientific procedure in which animals are used is legitimate. On one side of the scale that symbolizes the legislation in this field, we find the weight of science and safety, and on the other side, the weight of ethics. In this article we have reviewed some of the main ethical criteria that serve as a basis to balance the scale, in other words, to guide and legalize animal experimentation in the field of xenotransplantation (XT). To that end, we take into account the current revisions made to the European Directive regarding the welfare of animals used in scientific procedures (86/609/EEC), in order to reflect, in turn, on the following issue: where is European institutional ethics headed on this issue? |
| | |
Authors:
|
M Jorqui-Azofra; C M Romeo-Casabona |
Related Documents
:
|
13357743 - The action of ultraviolet radiation on yeast catalase. 19562483 - Federal environmental legislation in the u.s. for protection of wildlife and regulation... 18599733 - Challenging opinion 75. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Transplantation proceedings Volume: 42 ISSN: 1873-2623 ISO Abbreviation: Transplant. Proc. Publication Date: 2010 Jul-Aug |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-08-09 Completed Date: 2011-01-14 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0243532 Medline TA: Transplant Proc Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 2122-5 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Affiliation:
|
Inter-University Chair BBVA Foundation-Provincial Government of Biscay in Law and the Human Genome University of Deusto and University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain. mjorqui@genomelaw.deusto.es |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Animal Testing Alternatives
/
ethics,
legislation & jurisprudence Animal Welfare / ethics*, legislation & jurisprudence, standards Animals Bioethics Ethics, Medical* Europe Humans Spain Transplantation, Heterologous / ethics*, legislation & jurisprudence |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: A survey of the attitudes of scientists toward xenotransplantation in Taiwan.
Next Document: The attitude of Scottish citizens to xenotransplantation in the South East of Spain: an emerging pop...