Document Detail


Solid organ injury grading in trauma: accuracy of grading by surgical residents.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22856488     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma developed an Organ Injury Scale for management of patients with splenic, kidney, or liver injuries. Despite widespread use of the guidelines, the person who determines the injury grade varies among institutions. Our purpose was to determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement between surgical residents and a radiologist in grading solid organ injuries. We retrospectively reviewed patients with solid organ injuries from January 2009 to May 2010 and compared the grade of solid organ injuries by a single resident with grades by a single blinded radiologist using a paired t test, analysis of variance, or Kruskal-Wallis. Computed tomography scans of 58 patients with splenic injuries, 43 with liver injuries, and 16 with kidney injuries were reviewed. Average grades for splenic injuries were 2.5 and 2.4 (radiologist/resident); liver injuries, 2.6 and 2.1; and kidney injuries, 2.7 and 2.8. There were no significant differences in grading by the radiologist and resident for splenic and kidney injuries; however, equal values were only achieved in 43 and 38 per cent, respectively. There was a significant difference (average rating difference 0.54, P = 0.0002) in grading between the radiologist and resident for liver injuries with only 35 per cent having equal values and the radiologist grading on average 0.5 points higher than the resident. No demographic, injury, or outcome variables were significantly associated with interobserver variability (P > 0.05). Despite a significant difference for liver injury grading, interobserver agreement between residents and a single radiologist was low. Clinical implications and the impact on outcomes related to interobserver variations require further study.
Authors:
William F Powers; L Neal Beard; Ashley Adams; Cyrus A Kotwall; Thomas V Clancy; William W Hope
Related Documents :
22741048 - Use of cystoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic partial cystectomy.
24894788 - Transcatheter closure of residual postinfarction ventricular septal defect after dehisc...
23704838 - Perforation following colorectal endoscopy: what happens beyond the endoscopy suite?
22614808 - Comparison of the intraoral and transcervical approach in submandibular gland excision.
12172228 - History and current practice of tonsillectomy.
2295208 - Grading and staged resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American surgeon     Volume:  78     ISSN:  1555-9823     ISO Abbreviation:  Am Surg     Publication Date:  2012 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-08-03     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370522     Medline TA:  Am Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  834-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, South East Area Health Education Center, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for converting laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.
Next Document:  Readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: efforts need to focus on patient expectations and nonhos...