Document Detail

The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22247747     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
The emergence and development of convergent technologies for the purpose of improving human performance, including nanotechnology, biotechnology, information sciences, and cognitive science (NBICs), open up new horizons in the debates and moral arguments that must be engaged by philosophers who hope to take seriously the question of the ethical and social acceptability of these technologies. This article advances an analysis of the factors that contribute to confusion and discord on the topic, in order to help in understanding why arguments that form a part of the debate between transhumanism and humanism result in a philosophical and ethical impasse: 1. The lack of clarity that emerges from the fact that any given argument deployed (arguments based on nature and human nature, dignity, the good life) can serve as the basis for both the positive and the negative evaluation of NBICs. 2. The impossibility of providing these arguments with foundations that will enable others to deem them acceptable. 3. The difficulty of applying these same arguments to a specific situation. 4. The ineffectiveness of moral argument in a democratic society. The present effort at communication about the difficulties of the argumentation process is intended as a necessary first step towards developing an interdisciplinary response to those difficulties.
Jean-Pierre Béland; Johane Patenaude; Georges A Legault; Patrick Boissy; Monelle Parent
Related Documents :
24017347 - Echohealth and the identification of new viruses.
24017657 - Tin whiskers and the lead free initiative.
24016957 - Sensilla on the adult and larval antennae of cotinis nitida (coleoptera: scarabaeidae).
20807877 - An international bioinformatics infrastructure to underpin the arabidopsis community.
24779317 - Response to callahan and winslade.
20529367 - The infectious diseases society of america lyme guidelines: a cautionary tale about the...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-11-11
Journal Detail:
Title:  Nanoethics     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1871-4765     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-1-16     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101311055     Medline TA:  Nanoethics     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  295-307     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other?
Next Document:  Is Technology Good for Us? A Eudaimonic Meta-Model for Evaluating the Contributive Capability of Tec...