Document Detail

Smoke alarms for sleeping adults who are hard-of-hearing: comparison of auditory, visual, and tactile signals.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19125029     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVES: People who are hard-of-hearing may rely on auditory, visual, or tactile alarms in a fire emergency, and US standards require strobe lights in hotel bedrooms to provide emergency notification for people with hearing loss. This is the first study to compare the waking effectiveness of a variety of auditory (beeps), tactile (bed and pillow shakers), and visual (strobe lights) signals at a range of intensities. DESIGN: Three auditory signals, a bed shaker, a pillow shaker, and strobe lights were presented to 38 adults (aged 18 to 80 yr) with mild to moderately severe hearing loss of 25 to 70 dB (in both ears), during slow-wave sleep (deep sleep). Two of the auditory signals were selected on the basis that they had the lowest auditory thresholds when awake (from a range of eight signals). The third auditory signal was the current 3100-Hz smoke alarm. All auditory signals were tested below, at, and above the decibel level prescribed by the applicable standard for bedrooms (75 dBA). In the case of bed and pillow shakers intensities below, at, and above the level as purchased were tested. For strobe lights three levels were used, all of which were above the applicable standard. The intensity level at which participants awoke was identified by electroencephalograph monitoring. RESULTS: The most effective signal was a 520-Hz square wave auditory signal, waking 92% at 75 dBA, compared with 56% waking to the 75 dBA high-pitched alarm. Bed and pillow shakers awoke 80 to 84% at the intensity level as purchased. The strobe lights awoke only 27% at an intensity above the US standard. Nonparametric analyses confirmed that the 520-Hz square wave signal was significantly more effective than the current smoke alarm and the strobe lights in waking this population. CONCLUSIONS: A low-frequency square wave signal has now been found to be significantly more effective than all tested alternatives in a number of populations (hard-of-hearing, children, older adults, young adults, alcohol impaired) and should be adopted across the whole population as the normal smoke alarm signal. Strobe lights, even at high intensities, are ineffective in reliably waking people with mild to moderate hearing loss.
Dorothy Bruck; Ian R Thomas
Related Documents :
8155889 - Acoustic reflex threshold tenth percentiles and functional hearing impairment.
4010249 - Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss.
18574779 - Clinical application of long-term intensity and pitch matches in fluctuating low-freque...
24918509 - Measuring noise in classrooms: a systematic review.
2359269 - Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
19649479 - The noise spectrum influence on noise-induced hearing loss prevalence in workers.
8283159 - Light and biological rhythms.
21687679 - Clinical efficacy of blue light full body irradiation as treatment option for severe at...
8369539 - Comparison of sound quality and clarity with asymmetrical peak clipping and output limi...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ear and hearing     Volume:  30     ISSN:  1538-4667     ISO Abbreviation:  Ear Hear     Publication Date:  2009 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-01-06     Completed Date:  2009-04-21     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8005585     Medline TA:  Ear Hear     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  73-80     Citation Subset:  IM    
School of Psychology, Victoria University, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Acoustic Stimulation
Aged, 80 and over
Auditory Threshold
Equipment Design
Fires / prevention & control*
Hearing Impaired Persons*
Household Articles / instrumentation*
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Photic Stimulation
Protective Devices*
Young Adult
Reg. No./Substance:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Widespread auditory deficits in tune deafness.
Next Document:  Middle ear application of a sodium hyaluronate gel loaded with neomycin in a Guinea pig model.