Document Detail


Small (<or=3 cm) solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas at multiphasic multidetector CT.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20663966     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To analyze the imaging features of small (≤3 cm) solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) seen at multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (CT) in comparison with those of larger SPTs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. CT images of 42 histopathologically proven SPTs in the pancreas were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists in consensus analyzed the CT findings for the shape, location, diameter, ratio of solid-to-cystic components, border and margin, enhancement pattern, and enhancement grade of the tumors, as well as the presence of calcification, dilatation of the pancreatic duct, and parenchymal atrophy. Then, according to the feature analysis results, the reviewers classified all SPTs as typical or atypical; they also subdivided all SPTs into small (≤3 cm) and large SPTs (>3 cm) depending on the tumor size. Differences in the morphologic features between small SPTs and large typical and atypical SPTs were statistically evaluated by using the Fisher exact test; differences in attenuation between the pre- and postcontrast images and in the dynamic enhancement pattern according to nodule size (≤3 cm versus >3 cm) were evaluated by using the χ(2) test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.
RESULTS: There were 20 typical SPTs and 22 atypical SPTs. Of the 22 atypical SPTs, 12 (54%) were 3 cm or smaller in diameter and 10 (45%) were larger than 3 cm in diameter. Small atypical SPTs usually appeared as solid tumors with a sharp margin and without accompanying pancreatic duct dilatation or parenchymal atrophy. They also showed weak enhancement during the pancreatic phase and a gradually increasing enhancement pattern. All typical SPTs were larger than 3 cm and appeared as well-defined cystic and solid masses with heterogeneous enhancement, while all large atypical SPTs appeared as calcified solid masses or large cystic masses.
CONCLUSION: The imaging features of small SPTs are different from those of large SPTs, and small SPTs frequently appear as purely solid tumors with a sharp margin and gradual enhancement.
Authors:
Jee Hyun Baek; Jeong Min Lee; Seung Ho Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung-Ihn Choi
Related Documents :
11676276 - Novel approaches to imaging brain tumors.
3238436 - The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ewing sarcoma. a report of ...
3875266 - The impact of ct correlate scoutview images on radiation therapy planning.
10802376 - Mri measurements correctly predict the relative effects of tumor oxygenating agents on ...
21457176 - Semi-automatic volumetric assessment of perihemorrhagic edema with computed tomography.
20090446 - F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and f-18 fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-07-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  257     ISSN:  1527-1315     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-20     Completed Date:  2010-10-29     Revised Date:  2011-07-13    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  97-106     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Atrophy
Calcinosis / pathology,  radiography
Carcinoma, Papillary / pathology,  radiography*,  surgery
Chi-Square Distribution
Contrast Media / diagnostic use
Female
Humans
Iohexol / analogs & derivatives,  diagnostic use
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Pancreatic Neoplasms / pathology,  radiography*,  surgery
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Retrospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Contrast Media; 66108-95-0/Iohexol; 73334-07-3/iopromide
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):924; author reply 924-5   [PMID:  21602508 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Linking model systems to cancer therapeutics: the case of Mastermind.
Next Document:  Pulmonary emphysema: effect of lung volume on objective quantification at thin-section CT.