Document Detail


Small caliceal stones: what is the best method of treatment?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  2795747     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In a retrospective analysis classical radial nephrolithotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for symptomatic small nonobstructive caliceal stones were compared to evaluate morbidity. Size (less than 1 cm.) and location of the stone (caliceal and nonobstructive) did not explain the severity of the symptoms nor would they have been an indication for an operation. In 8 patients treated by an open operation, 16 treated percutaneously and 6 who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the procedure time, success rate, complication rate and length of hospitalization were analyzed. Followup consisted of ultrasound and/or a plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 1 day and 3 months postoperatively. A nephrotomogram was included in group 3 patients. Of 30 patients 3 had persistent stone fragments for more than 3 months: 2 underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 1 was treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. A total of 28 patients (93.3 per cent) achieved complete or significant relief of pain. In the percutaneous group both patients with persistent fragments were symptomatic in contrast with the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy group, in which 1 patient presented with stone fragments but was free of pain. The group treated percutaneously had a shorter procedure time (60 minutes) and the shock wave group had a shorter hospitalization. On the other hand, the open operation group had a better success rate as well as relief of pain. These observations showed that small, nonobstructive caliceal stones can be responsible for persistent, severe flank pain. Since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is an effective noninvasive procedure that does not require routine anesthesia and hospitalization, with prompt return of the patient to normal life, it must be considered the method of choice in these particular patients.
Authors:
N R Netto Júnior; J F Claro; U Ferreira; G C Lemos
Related Documents :
3181197 - Treatment of paediatric urolithiasis by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.
11465327 - Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients aged 60 years or older.
16428097 - Shock wave lithotripsy for uric acid stones.
17144957 - Location modalities for focused extracorporeal shock wave application in the treatment ...
21477547 - Radiographic analysis of an opening wedge osteotomy of the medial cuneiform.
11783917 - Surgical management of severe deformity resulting from posterior tibial tendon dysfunct...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  142     ISSN:  0022-5347     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  1989 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1989-10-31     Completed Date:  1989-10-31     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  941-2     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Urology, University of Campinas Medical Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Kidney Calculi / physiopathology,  surgery,  therapy*
Lithotripsy
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrons / surgery
Pain / therapy
Particle Size
Retrospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cystine calculi--rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction.
Next Document:  The detection of renal carcinoma extension into the renal vein and inferior vena cava: a prospective...