| Slaves, embryos, and nonhuman animals: moral status and the limitations of common morality theory. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 16453948 Owner: KIE Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Common morality theory must confront apparent counterexamples from the history of morality, such as the widespread acceptance of slavery in prior eras, that suggest core norms have changed over time. A recent defense of common morality theory addresses this problem by drawing a distinction between the content of the norms of the common morality and the range of individuals to whom these norms apply. This distinction is successful in reconciling common morality theory with practices such as slavery, but only at the cost of underscoring the limits of common morality theory, in particular its inability to resolve disputes about the moral status of entities. Given that many controversies in bioethics center on the disputed status of various entities, such as embryos and nonhuman animals, this is an important limitation. Nonetheless, common morality theory still can be a useful resource in diminishing moral conflict on issues that do not involve disputes over moral status. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Ronald A Lindsay |
Related Documents
:
|
2047948 - Academic boycott--political strategy or moral imperative? selective support as a justif... 8151238 - Talking ethics with strangers: a view from jewish tradition. 20394108 - Are moral philosophers moral experts? 18363268 - Must we have full moral status throughout our existence? a reply to alfonso gómez-lobo. 20677548 - Nanotechnology and the nanodermatology society. 22404278 - We are all in this together: working towards a holistic understanding of self-harm. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Historical Article; Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal Volume: 15 ISSN: 1054-6863 ISO Abbreviation: Kennedy Inst Ethics J Publication Date: 2005 Dec |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2006-02-02 Completed Date: 2006-02-13 Revised Date: 2007-11-15 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9109135 Medline TA: Kennedy Inst Ethics J Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 323-46 Citation Subset: E |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Animal Rights Animals Bioethical Issues* Bioethics Consensus Cultural Diversity Dissent and Disputes Embryo, Mammalian Ethical Relativism Ethical Theory* Freedom History, 18th Century History, 19th Century History, 20th Century History, 21st Century History, Ancient History, Medieval Human Rights / history Humans Internationality Moral Obligations Morals* Personhood Population Groups / history Religion Retrospective Moral Judgment Social Problems / history War |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Understanding trust and confidence: two paradigms and their significance for health and social care.
Next Document: At the edge of humanity: human stem cells, chimeras, and moral status.